He did have more fire in his eyes today.
I've been looking them over, but until people start buying the cards we don't have too much to go on with what is already presented.
Clark Mitchell is the artist, according to the site. I tried looking him up, for if he has a website gallery, but all I get are watercolors from someone else also called Clark Mitchell.
Clickbait works, don't it?
The video is less than 7 minutes long.
How can there be a 12:59 timestamp?
Are we talking about the truth post time? In which case, yeah, it's 12:59.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/109518990392565381
Just making sure people aren't mistaken, for whatever reason.
He says as soon as he is inaugurated he is gonna go after the entire censorship scheme, from every level of federal government to section 230 and private businesses.
It's effectively a game plan for what he's gonna do to stop government censorship and election engineering/rigging.
Things like preventing any government official from being hired in any social media site that handles American data for 7 years.
It's really meaty, I advise looking into it.
Here it is reposted on Twitter. Same video in Trump's truth.
Okay, let's say I gave you a number.
I hold in my possession an equation which produces another number should you give me yours to process.
One is a lock, the other is a key. This is cryptography terms, thus the "crypto" name for the currency. To reverse engineer the solving of the equation takes time. That's why bitcoin farms and the like exist, because they have to process the equation backwards to receive their certificate. As more certificates are granted, the longer each certificate takes to make, so there's a point where a bitcoin will take longer than the human lifespan to authenticate, at which point, unlike our Federal Reserve, you can't just print more of the things.
This makes it good for a currency form.
There are many potential equations which process that number into the other. If we choose just one of those equations, however, then there is only one input number which produces the outcome outcome number.
If I, the rights holder to the equation, offer to certify your number, then it has a "tangible" worth because there is only one of those certificates in the world.
This is how normal crypto currency works. You are trading certificates which represent a working mathematical equation decryptions. You're allowed to do this, legally, because it counts as intellectual property. It also goes through an internet blockchain, but that's just for authenticity purposes -- to ensure you're the only holder of the certificate.
NFTs supposedly take it to the next level. Images are effectively a string of numbers and symbols which can also be used in the crypto equation. So, then, why not use those 0s and 1s and certificate an image?
And so, the blockchain backend, which represents your "ownership" of the encryption can be viewed in its original form, as a digital image.
You can trade these, just like cryptocurrency, but they just also happen to have a visual representation. If you change a single pixel, however, it also changes the 0s and 1s and you don't have the same ownership of the crypto certificate. That means, there exists a single, legitimate image for that NFT.
Which means they can be traded like cards, except unlike cards there is potentially only one of each.
This is generally how it works, and I left out a ton for the sake of "simplicity", but it's safe to just treat NFTs like a magician's deck of cards. "Pick a card, any card" and that's your card. It goes through some magic, but you have some degree of assurances by the owner of the deck there is only one of that card you picked.
If you don't trust NFT's that's fine, because you aren't obligated to trust a magician either. I don't invest in them because of that. It's fun and exciting, but ultimately all crypto, just like anything else, is only worth something if you find someone who wants it.
Someone had to make the underwear.
Ah, now you're speaking my language!
What would you do if the power went out right now?
I'd light a candle and start crocheting.
This is what comes to mind when I think of a fly:
https://www.sacred-texts.com/sks/flos/flos11.htm
Gadfly.—A common name for this fly is the "brize" or "breese," an allusion to which occurs in "Troilus & Cressida," (i. 3), where Nestor, speaking of the sufferings which cattle endure from this insect, says:—
"The herd hath more annoyance by the breese Than by the tiger." And in "Antony and Cleopatra," (iii. 9), Shakespeare makes the excited Scarus draw a comparison between the effect which this insect produces on a herd of cattle, and the abruptness and sudden frenzy of Cleopatra's retreat from the naval conflict:—
"You ribaudred nag of Egypt,
Whom leprosy o’ertake! i’ the midst o’ the fight, When vantage like a pair of twins appear’d Both the same, or rather ours the elder, The breese upon her, like a cow in June, Hoists sails and flies." p. 239
It is said that the terror this insect causes in cattle proceeds solely from the alarm occasioned by "a peculiar sound it emits while hovering for the purpose of oviposition." 1
In other words, it's a thing which irritates cattle.
If we are cattle (livestock) then a fly would by anyone who antagonizes conservatives on social media to set them as an example and strawman.
You know, the whole "I'm not touching you, I'm not touching you, I'm not touching you" gambit.
I'd keep an eye on his husbando, then. He might be the fall-back.
Follow the wives and all.
Good catch.
I think there's a possibility that's the Journalists or Elon's data-miners handiwork. Remember, we're only getting screenshots; screenshots that could have been edited/condensed/redacted on some points where necessary.
Until we get the actual, bonafide files, we're left to assume any number of things. That the Twitter staff aren't refuting these claims on their authenticity, however, indicates they don't want to beat the hornets nest any more than necessary should they pursue defamation claims.
Everyone has reason to walk on egg shells right now, even Elon. Hell, if he finds a treasure trove of child porn ON TWITTER SERVERS and didn't immediately go to the police with it as soon as it's discovered, he could face charges.
OR is he a rank-and-file degenerate who persecuted others while spewing his filth all over Twitter?
This might help you decide:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/yoelroth
Researcher, Dangerous Speech Project Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University Aug 2014 - Jun 2015 11 months
Developed and implemented protocols for collecting and evaluating large data sets studying online hate speech. Trained research assistants in quantitative and qualitative social media data management and analysis.
He was hired onto Twitter for the express purpose of silencing speech, AND training others to do so as well. His previous position at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet suggests as much. He was put in charge of that.
Later, his title was changed to "safety" in an obtuse way of saying the same thing. He's making Twitter "safe" by protecting kiddie porn merchants from the big, bad meanies and their "hate speech."
I'm not disagreeing with you, but we have plenty enough to go on to assume he's a POS and has been well before his time at Twitter. His Tweets are just icing on the cake, in my opinion.
Also, there's this:
Head of Site Integrity Jul 2018 - May 20223 years 11 months San Francisco Bay Area
Lead Twitter’s global Site Integrity team, responsible for policy development, implementation, and investigations for spam, data privacy and security, information operations, election security, and misinformation. Direct Twitter’s efforts to combat information operations and suspected state-backed activity.
Holy shit, that last line though.
What were the "combat information operations and suspected state-backed activity" he's talking about?
Could it be? Dare I say?
Q?
Makes sense what we know now given Q's posts, aye?
The problem is that the work doesn't pay enough.
After you go through all the regulations, health insurance, benefits, etc. a lot of the youth look at the job and figure "why do that for minimum wage and no benefits when I can just work at McDonalds?"
I mean, it's fair to say their standard of living is higher than foreigner too (in other words they're spoiled).
But, ultimately, I think the biggest issue is that there is no pride in work anymore. Today, work is a means by which you make money; money is then used to goof off. Careers no longer exist. No one identifies as a "mechanic" or a "carpenter." The average American in these positions sees themselves as nothing more than a wage slave, and have been taught by our social system to shun and reject such professions' esteem as such.
Just another grunt and cog in the machine. If something goes wrong, they are just replaced with another China-made imported part.
That's what I see in the job market, anyways. All these positions are over-regulated, require you to have 10+ years on the job just to have your resume read, and yet still manage to treat their employees like disposable machines rather than people who take pride in their work.
If you really want to point fingers, I blame the corporate structure and its HR practices which have raped and murdered small businesses by setting bars too high to get the job while simultaneously having bars too low in order to keep it. It makes for too few people thinking themselves capable while also having too many people doing the bare minimum with no fear of consequence.
It probably is Elon Musk. I can't think of anyone else.
If they had Control, what would be the point of Elon taking over?
I wouldn't call it control, exactly. You can see your opponent's cards in a card game, but that doesn't mean you can tell them which cards to play.
Aside from that, my best guess is that it has to present as a "movie" where the public figures it out for themselves. People have more attachment to a thing if they have to invest time to puzzle out what's actually going on.
You might notice that Elon is acting like he is just now figuring this stuff out for himself as well; he's acting like he bought Twitter not knowing it was a crime scene. It's pretty obvious he's just acting coy.
Actually, if it was in Slack like how u/SuddenRealization suggested, it would look like this:
Light will overcome d a rkness. Light will expose darkne s s. Light will reveal darkness. Light will defeat darkness.
"AS REVEAL"?
In the Q post, :Owls: is spelled encapsulated by colons.
What if, and this is a BIG what if... Q posted on their slack channel the exact same message?
It would have looked a lot different on Slack. Could you imagine if a random message from who-knows-where just appeared on your Slack convo and then, at the same time, showed up on 4Chan?
It would freak me the hell out, especially if I was a reprobate like those working at Twitter.
Ah, didn't know that, as I don't use Slack.
Even so, his frequent use of them does narrow down the number of people.
The FLYROTHSFLY bordered by hashtags (hashtags being a predominantly Twitter thing) does leave little wiggle room. It's either Yoel Roth or the Rothschilds. Seeing how the hashtags and "Owl" combo now skews towards the Twitter angle, with help from the Twitter Files drops, it's pretty convincing nonetheless.
On another note, are colons used in Slack frequently?
Oh, and Q in post 328 wrote out "ASS REVEAL"
Yoel Roth's ass is getting shown to the world right now.
The original still has some importance for evidentiary procedure. Copies are good for the evidence on them, so long as you can authenticate them. The authentication process, therefore, is so much easier if you have the actual laptop and a clear record of each moment it changed hands. It could take days in court to describe before a jury why/how a copy is just as good as the original for the sake of prosecution. On top of that, they could probably snag some DNA off it for whatever reason.
I'd say, at the very least, they offer a solid timeline of events surrounding Trump's Presidency and the lesser-known hallmarks of his time in office. Many things any President does is overlooked because people always focus on the tree once it finally bears fruit.
Q's posts offer us a lens to view back into history of every moment the seed of those trees were planted. On top of that, it also promotes research and discussion into those past events, plotting the growth of said trees.
Tangle up some christmas lights as best you can. Then untangle them. Once you get good at untangling them, having arduously developed a pattern and method to do so, you will have all the tools to arrive at the end of the internet.
It is a "net" after all.
Trace back the original homeland of the Vedic faith. Khazars came before Jews but not Hebrew, they were just known as pagan "wind"-worshipers in those days.
Why are there redaction bars over the police emblems?