2
spheenik 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never underestimate an enemy that has brought the state of affairs this far!

4
spheenik 4 points ago +4 / -0

If it weren't for 911, I would possibly not be here. Researching this event furiously 15 years ago was my personal apocalypse, in the literal meaning.

4
spheenik 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you want to ruin your day further, I invite you to read the story of David Reimer:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer

Just fucking sad. May John Money rot in hell.

by Quelle
3
spheenik 3 points ago +3 / -0

He seems to have forgotten his BIG wolf crying from 2 days ago, and is acting like nothing happened. Very believable, Ron.

3
spheenik 3 points ago +3 / -0

The literal meaning of "Apocalypse" is this:

The Book of Revelation in the New Testament has the literal title in Greek, the "Apocalypse of John." The word apocalypse means revelation. ... It comes from the Greek word which literally means to pull the lid off something. So that which is revealed is central to the way that apocalyptic literature works. ...

Your're in it, and you know it.

1
spheenik 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why shouldn't businesses be allowed to close their doors to refusers of the magic juice?

Like with the vaccine, it's their choice. I mean, do you want to force them to not loose customers?

9
spheenik 9 points ago +10 / -1

Charlie Kirk can go fuck himself in my view. There is a certain eye he is completely blind on.

3
spheenik 3 points ago +3 / -0

I beg to differ. I'm pretty sure the certificate is fake, but for a different reason, which would be that Obummer is a love child of a whore and a filthy communist.

more info

2
spheenik 2 points ago +2 / -0

I really wonder what's going on with her lately. I'm having a hard time believing that her posting the "tweet recommendation document" was really an accident. Maybe she's trying to sabotage?

2
spheenik 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is because the textual representation is missing completely on these pages. This is not typical practice, but if you ask for the reason, I can only speculate...

5
spheenik 5 points ago +5 / -0

A technical detail of PDF:

if you can copy text out of PDFs, the text is actually contained in the file 2 times. One time as vector images of the characters, and a second time as the actual text. If the second representation would be missing, you would see the text, but would not be able to select it and copy it out.

Now, in this document, you see that the vector images are correct, since you can see the characters (and they make sense), but the copied text is wrong. This means that the software the PDF was written with was somehow buggy and output the text in a non standards compliant (or outright buggy) way.

5
spheenik 5 points ago +5 / -0

"You have no choice! You have OWNERS! They OWN you!"

George Carlin was like a father to me. Rest in peace, George!

3
spheenik 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok, so they all swore (including Lloyd Austin): "I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic".

This means that if certain evidence would see the light of day, they would be obliged by their oath to act on it.

5
spheenik 5 points ago +5 / -0

I know all these theories, but since so much fake news goes around on all sides at the moment, I want to refrain from believing them until I stumble over hard evidence.

3
spheenik 3 points ago +3 / -0

Never did before, this is it, right?

I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

5
spheenik 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Zhou Bai Den" - Nice one. I'll steal that!

1
spheenik 1 point ago +3 / -2

Could be a 2, 3 or 5.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›