1
thephantom1979 1 point ago +1 / -0

A lot of people believe that sticking with one own race is nature.

I disagree:

Because if we break down marriage at its core.

Marriage is about physical attraction between a man and woman.

You cannot control who you find attraction with.

When you break down men.

Men are attracted to the female body parts such as her breast and butt.

That is bare base nature right there.

If a white man sees a naked black or Indian woman who he thinks have nice breast and butt:

That is enough to produce a chemical reaction for him to want to pursue her.

Now..

Due to social and cultural pressures. He might tell himself no:

I am not going to pursue her because it might cause a problem with his family.

So he chooses to go against nature of natural attraction.

That’s my argument.

1
thephantom1979 1 point ago +1 / -0

The reason why that happens is due to being in proximity next to those who look like you.

It a nation is completely Irish. Their preferences will be Irish due to only having the options of Irish.

If other groups start to mix in with the Irish.

The next question would be.

Are they forced into their own separate areas legally like Jim Crow?

If the answer is yes. Then people would be forced to stick with their own.

If the answer is no.

Then next question comes in play:

Does this other group of people speak the same language as the Irish?

If the answer is no.

Then people will stick with their own due to not understanding each other.

If the answer is yes.

The next question comes in play.

Are there any negative stereotypes about these outsiders by the Irish.

For example. If the Irish thought these outsiders were criminals and degenerates.

Then there would be social pressures from the Irish to stick with their own.

Which would stop a lot of race mixing.

If the answer is no.

Then race mixing would happen: For example. Tons of white Americans are mixed: Such as mixed with white Irish and White Polish.

Young children do not have a problem with playing with different cultures of kids.

It is the kids parents that use social pressures and teaching to get their kids to distance themselves from different groups of people.

A person isn’t born to dislike others.

A man is born to get an erection when he sees an attractive naked woman.

If a white man sees an attractive black or Indian woman walk without clothes on in front of him.

Are you telling me he would not get turned on by that???

If you believe that.

Than you believe attraction is a choice that we turn on like a light switch.

I disagree.

Attraction is a chemical reaction that a man will get turned on to seeing any naked woman that gives him a chemical reaction that he cannot control.

So I agree with you that people will stick with their own.

But it’s not because it’s natural.

It’s because their are a lot of social, cultural and geographical factors that causes people to want to stick with their own.

I hope this makes sense lol. Sorry for the rambling.

0
thephantom1979 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ahh.. I see.

I personally see it as "White Looking" or "Black Looking".

When it comes down to it. If you saw me in real life.

You would call me Black.

I do not think "White Looking" people will ever go away.

1
thephantom1979 1 point ago +1 / -0

To me, it just means idolizing a human being. This isn’t something that happens overnight.

It’s about falling into a slippery slope. Take Elon Musk, for example.

I’ve seen several conservative accounts praising the Neuralink implant. Neuralink could be seen as a gateway to the Mark of the Beast.

The same conservatives who would condemn it if Bill Gates released it now think it’s acceptable because Elon is behind it.

That’s the problem with admiring human beings.

10
thephantom1979 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's really just the Establishment Vs Anti-Establishment

-1
thephantom1979 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I don't see this happening.

You will have more mixed half white/half black.

or half white/half hispanic kids.

Those mixed kids tend to date white more often. So those mixed kids will have a kid with another white person.

The color of new kids will be white looking.

No one cares about the "ONE DROP RULE"/. That's not logical.

2
thephantom1979 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even historical figures have flaws, and that's where my concern lies.

Think about how narratives are shaped—take the example of George Floyd. Today, he has a statue, and future generations might be told he was a hero. But this highlights a broader issue: the tradition of elevating individuals with statues is often driven by selective narratives.

If we look at 2024, some of the biggest contributors to success aren’t the most visible figures. For example, Scott Presler and others like him had a significant impact on the election, yet they don’t have statues.

This brings me to my main point: success is rarely the result of one person alone. Often, it’s the collective effort of countless "little guys" and "little girls" who play crucial roles in achieving that success. Their contributions, though vital, often go unrecognized.

So why do we focus on idolizing one person with a statue? When their success is built on the efforts of a team.

This ties back to a timeless truth: idolizing individuals can lead us to overlook the power and importance of the many unsung heroes who make success possible.

5
thephantom1979 5 points ago +8 / -3

It’s about thou shall not bow down to a graven Image:

It’s a form of idolization in my opinion.

14
thephantom1979 14 points ago +14 / -0

Trump wants taffifs,

He does not want the tax based system.

I am thinking this is Trump's secret way of moving to a taffif base system.

2
thephantom1979 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the anti white movement is pretty much dead.

Think about how much money and ratings these places have been losing.

The reason why the anti white sentiment has worked was because enough whites supported it.

The tide has turned now.

What whites are doing now is something they didn’t account for.

They thought they could get enough whites to openly push for racial segregation like the past:

Instead… whites started to use economic warfare of boycotts to just not support them anymore.

Also by enough whites keeping their cool and and use the legal system to sue them for racism against whites!

The combination of lawfare and economic warfare is the most powerful weapon that whites have used to fight back.

You don’t need physical force or to even call for racial segregation.

Whites just need to

  1. Expose them for racial discrimination against whites.

  2. Sue them for civil rights violations.

  3. Economically boycott them.

Once the money machine is effected publicly. Once they know they can now be sued by whites.

It’s game over for the anti white movement long term.

You can legally now fight back against anti white racism.

This has never happened before.

It’s a good thing for true equality.

2
thephantom1979 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exposing them should still happen So the people understand why the criminal activity keeps happening

It’s because the government is allowing it to happen.

18
thephantom1979 18 points ago +18 / -0

To my white friends.

The woke movement was the best thing that happened for you.

  1. It allowed them to expose themselves
  2. It allowed whites to push civil lawsuits of discrimination
9
thephantom1979 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think it's because Flynn has been in the Intel Agencies for a long time. Flynn might have some conflict of interest in my view.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›