They come to retire, nobody takes US soccer seriously, it has very bad ratings and attendance. They're simply playing it at a much lower level/pace than other countries.
They drop in soccer in particular because it's the most physically taxing sport.
In the us there's not much soccer to begin with, next to no high end soccer for sure.
Because its the most brutal on cardio
who would downvote this
yep, it s a photo op to have black ppl present
“Where do I get just the plain old news?”
a jew lamenting about news bias. now i've seen it all
pedophilia and homos, name a more iconic duo
(except pedophilia and jews)
a woman is a woman
~insert based chad jpg~
regardless of her age
~insert pedo jew jpg~
Jack is a f@ggot
let me know when you lose the entitlement, until then do not bother me again please.
This is not a problem of homosexuality to begin with, your choices have other deeper motives, mainly humanism, rejection of authority, social norms and Christianity.
If it's one thing i've learned is not to waste time in such situations.
You haven’t convinced me
The usual entitlement. You've shown you know next to nothing about homosexuality and yet it's still someone else's job to dance for you.
Again, sadly you're too far gone, both in beliefs and attitude (entitlement and ignorance). Hopefully you'll get back to your senses some day, but with that attitude it's impossible. Giving up Christianity most certainly didn't help but explains your lack of standards and attitude.
Bye
But I do accept people being transexual as well
should've told me that from the beginning, i would've predicted all the answers you've given me (heard them so many times already) and would not have wasted my time.
when a person even entertains the possibility of "changing sex", that person it too far removed from objective reality.
bye
hope you're not Christian cause this would be even worse for you
A lot of consenting adults do a lot of crazy shit behind closed doors. We do not change our language to incorporate their acts and "spread awareness". Two adults licking eachothers butts after shitting is perfectly possible. Again, we don't modify "wiping" to include that.
It's a spit in the face for people who believe in marriage, when marriage has always been about creating a family, to include people who literally can not procreate. There is no reason they wouldn't ask for civil partnership, which would've been like marriage but with a different name. They WANTED the legitimacy of marriage specifically to legitimize their behavior.
I see you're still refusing to say if you know any negatives about homosexuality even after 6 comments to so i guess i'll never find out that part.
Do you know that in nature there is no EXCLUSIVE homosexuality? Literally the behavior does not exist. There are extremely rare cases of BIsexuality, and out of those next to none involve penetration, it's just mounting/dominance behavior interpreted as proof of homosexuality to legitimize it.
Do you also understand that the reason the penis and vagina exist is for PIV sex? They would literally not have evolved otherwise.
Do you know that 3 meta studies have shown that 2x to 22x of LGBT people have been molested when compared to heterosexuals? Can you even grasp what a magnitude of even 2x or 3x even means?
Do you know that factoring population rates, pedophiles are disproportionately homosexual?
Do you even grasp the extent of pedophilia in LGBT?
Do you know that homosexuals are more likely than heterosexuals to have mental disorders, even in countries where "acceptance" is very high?
Do you know homosexuality is fundamentally a gender disorder and transexuality is a natural consequence of normalization of homosexuality?
Do you understand that by accepting homosexuality you automatically accept transexuality and "sex changes"?
Do you know that the very term "homosexual" is a term invented by a german or austrian "psychologist" a century ago? Not that men having sex with men did not exist before, but the distinction was very different and this has been constant in all societies and still exists today? (the men that fucked the men were normal men and the men getting fucked were women - hinting to the gender disorder)
Do you know that many psychologists at that time also disapproved of the term "homosexual", including the first psychologist that wrote a book on it (Havelock Ellis)
Do you know that as much as the "gay gene" was touted, even a study of 500k people found nothing?
Do you understand that homosexuality is for the most part a learned behavior?
i mean your level of degeneracy is showing already, being ok with adults fucking silicone kids or animals.
Your argument is based on sexual attraction. The other part about consenting adults is separate and adults can consent on a wide variety of things. We don't start including that in our collective behavior and language.
Consenting adults can lick their buttholes clean after shitting, we don't redefine wiping to include that. We don't put ads about it in stores, don't make movies about it and dont teach kids about it. Yet i mean, because with lazy and careless people like you anything is possible.
For what is probably the 5th time so far, do you know any negative aspect of homosexuality or is it literally a utopia?
IF your argument is that sexual attraction is a justification, you should have no problem with adults using realistic sex dolls kids or animals or having sex with dead bodies (that consented if it's a human or did not consent if it's an animal).
I asked you if out of your sack of homosexuality knowledge there is any negative thing about it.
But all this is beyond the topic of gay marriage. It's certainly possible to support gay marriage without supporting pedophilia, zoophilia, whatever else.
It's not, because the underlying argument is "i support it because sexual attraction validates it". You either accept that argument or you don't, that's the foundation for the reasoning. It's not a different conversation, it's the same conversation.
"Sexual attraction validates it."
So you're telling me you know so much about homosexuality and out of all that knowledge NOTHING about it is negative?
This is the most common trope.
The reasoning that it's "sexual attraction" justifies it. You do know there are people sexually attracted to cars for example, right? As in they get sexual arousal off it, erections etc. There are hundreds of paraphilias and they all share sexual attraction. Pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia, etc, those are genuine sexual attractions. Before you jump in with the classic consent counter argument, you do know there is now the technology to make ultra realistic silicone full body dogs, kids or what have you. Following your logic, any sexual acting out with any of those is genuine and natural on the only premise that "sexual attraction" exists. Necrophilia with a real dead animal body would also not violate any rights.
As for marriage, ignoring all the negative aspects of homosexuality you have no idea about, any normalization of behavior encourages it. You think the explosion of "transgenders" is natural or normal? It's not, it's learned behavior because peers normalized it.
What's your argumentation for deeming it normal
what do you know about homosexuality?
It's bad that in your mind no possibility exists that homosexuality had not been normalized for valid reasons.
in your mind there exist no negative or even possible negative effect and you decided this a priori.
I would expect it stems from a desire to be different and oppose the status quo just because.
No my dude, this is how a rational and responsible person acts:
"So this new thing i have absolutely no idea about, should i normalize it to the degree of being as fundamental part of society, as marriage is?"
"What's my position to alter such a fundamental aspect of society?"
"Why was this not normalized in any society in any part of the world?"
"Why don't they just ask for civil union or something else that is not marriage to begin with, insisting on altering what marriage is instead?"
I could go on and on.
Last but not least, the first thing i would expect from you is at least some admission of fault for not doing any of this and some interest in doing some research yourself.
fuck your complacency dude, you expect everything to be served to you on a silver platter, just like the rest of the NPCs expect fact checkers to do the work for them and tell them who to vote for
virtue signaling and complacency also go hand in hand
Ideally i want you to stop supporting something you have no clue about, regardless of what that something is.
According to ESPN "experts", american organization.
There is literally no way for boxing to be most taxing, lmao.
Soccer is unique in that it only has one break and two 45 minute long halves. Its is a LOT of cardio and switching between sprints and endurance. The only thing that could rival it is water polo but that has 8 minute quartered plays.