There’s some crazy stuff out there about tribunals, executions, body doubles, AI cloning, etc. . . Sadly, I’m at the point I might believe anything. But, since I’m new to these parts and fear that I might sound like a crazed consp theorist (which my family thinks) . . . I’ll start with the question of tribunals. BTW it’s taken me a while to build the courage to ask, so take it easy on me plz.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
We know for a fact that John McCain was executed so I would have to assume their was a military trial first. We had always believed that and it was confirmed by both Chris Christie and McCains daughter who slipped up.
IndyRose, this is the best response so far.
No name McCain is for sure one who was put down for being a traitor. I think he was so blatantly a traitor that Q wanted everyone to know without a doubt. If you haven’t seen the thread on how Q predicted it and the phrase “every dog has its day” then it would be a good one to research. It’s one of my favorite Q proofs.
I always thought it very telling that Q said "we don't say his name". He uses names and monikers for every other major player in this whole scam (our government) from Hussein to HC & WJC. Imagine what a filthy slimebag piece of shit this guy had to be in order for his name to not even be allowed to be spoken.
I feel like he was the first to be killed for treason.
Yes, I think he had to be pretty awful if a person to make Q hate him that much.
Even with HRC and potential human violations and frazzledrip etc, she still gets named. So he had to be far worse.
Makes you really wonder what he did and how much he sold out. Maybe he was responsible for enormous amounts of US service member deaths? I don’t know but I agree, had to be very very bad.
And didn't he have a wrinkled flag on his casket?
Will do thx
So did John Kasich.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nvb4sl1K3eg
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=L5pjpLiw30M
There was a clip of John Kasich on CNN who said it out loud. Q let us know and he confirmed it. So did Meghan No-name. She said they could only kill him once. It will all come out eventually. I think Daddy Bush was taken out the same way, but not sure on that one.
Yes. I asked this question just a couple of days ago. Got NO response.
I am sincerely seeking the source. The TRUTH.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nvb4sl1K3eg
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=L5pjpLiw30M
I don't remember Chris Christie confirming it, but I know John Kasich did.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvb4sl1K3eg
How do "we know for a fact" about NoName? I was trying to find the support for that assertion a few days ago and was unsuccessful.
Please provide the factual sauce.
Q said McCain would return to headlines. 30 days later he was dead. Q's post and McCain's death were both at 28 minutes past the hour. Q also said about McCain that every dog has it's day. The White House put their flag at half staff on National Dog Day.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ECiZ-AVUwAEwkFq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
I love how Biden was wearing dog socks in a manner reminiscent of H.W. I figure old Timberwolf (H.W.) was put down like a dog and Biden will soon have his turn.
Why would it be done in secret? I don't understand why a traitor being executed would be known to politicians but hidden from the public.
Maybe he made some deal in exchange for getting a public cover story for his death.
Maybe the crimes he committed can't be made public right now for reasons of national security. Can't really tell everyone you executed a Senator and Presidential Candidate but can't say what for.
Q did originally say 80% of their cabal cleanup would have to be done in secret
What I'm looking for is evidence.
Not hearsay or coincidence. Something that would stand up to scrutiny by the lawyers in my family.
Then wait, I suppose. The entire premise of Q also rests on “you have to let everyone see“ in order to awaken. Not "here's this one thing," and “here's another," but a sewing of fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
For the lawyer members, have them think about it as casting doubt on the assertion (criminal) vs. what you're asking for which is a "preponderance of evidence,“ (civil).
Shift either your burden or their burden.
If an alarm goes off at 11:30am every day, prove to me without looking at the clock that it's not set to 11:30pm and the clock isn't set incorrectly. Or, accept that being set icorrectly is heresay but the alarm at 11:30 is true.
Are you looking for argumentative support or are you looking to refute by demanding standards for acceptance you haven't defined?