However, we never thought the President of the United States would be denied his 1st Amendment rights so just because the presidential alerts are mandatory doesn’t mean they won’t slip in & change it. Lin has been spot on so I think I have to stand by him. I don’t trust Apple.
I do agree that what Wood has said only parrots a lot of what we've already been over. Especially in Voat and the Chans.
However, I would say that the fact NO ONE has sued his pants off and moved to disbar him over his accusations when [they] have the money and power to do so is very telling. The only one to be sued so far is Powell, by Dominion. Not only has no one filed suit, not one has come out to deny, debunk, call for a cease and desist, nothing. [Their] silence sure is deafening.
He's also an anti defamation lawyer. He fully knows and understands the implications of his accusations if they're false. I don't think one of the nation's premier anti defamation lawyers would risk career suicide like this over baseless accusations. Powell isn't. Rudy G and Trump's legal team isn't. Why would Wood?
I think you make an important point about Lin echoing the Q zeitgeist. Regardless of whether he knows anymore than the collective "edge-knowledge" of this board and its network counterparts across the chans, it's having a galvanization effect that's not on the whole negative.
I agree with you that people shouldn't be looking to Lin for their epistemological increase, but rather to realize that the name of the game right now is to echo and amplify. Pour fuel on fires, it's not about waiting for instruction. It's about recognizing how to win an information war.
I believe the good guys will win but the DS (Apple,Google, etc.) doesn't care about violating the law. If they don't lose, none of their bad acts will matter because they won't be prosecuted. If they lose, they'll be on the hook for much worse. So for the DS et al it's balls to the wall, full on scorched earth to "win at any cost".
Name something the democrats have done that is allowed by law?
Name one reason why they would remove this claim about presidential alerts if they simply wanted to disable them?
President sends an alert > Apple products don't get them > "woops it was a bug! we'll totally get that fixed by the time biden is inaugurated, promise!"
This is healthy and I like it. Irish, in effect you're raising the EBS signal further by playing the pragmatist. Whether Lin knows anything or not about EBS, I do think he's pretty knowledgeable of media / signal-noise theory and has observed its effects on the flow of information over several years.
He's fundamentally narrative inflating, and that's only bad if folks rely on him or anyone as a source of truth. We're outside the domain of truth now. We're purely in the domain of signal and noise, and the game is to pick and choose what signals to amplify and which to let wash away into the noise.
I've read most of your replies on this board at this point and you're clearly projecting and freaking out over what amounts to nothing.... take your meds
You fascists have proven there is no law and no justice in court. You are just trying to destroy our last trusted sources of Comms. Go away you are so obvious.
YES....i and by the wordof many other here, found our iPhns in process of updating to 14.3 after reading this news almost 24 hours ago. My phn was loading it to myphn whne i checked, personally...i caught it beforeit finished, and before it started installing..so i was thankful. nice to see so much bashing from mr Irish, on something that is darn near old news and confirmed. Shill harder on Unconfirmed stories mr Irish. This is Way down the feed by now.You are late and looking foolish.
Apple could change the code and remove them completely. Response would be that it was an inadvertent accident. Just cause an option shows doesn't mean its programmed to work.
The fact that you can't turn these off by choice validates what Lin is saying - they need an update to turn off Presidential alerts.
As far as it being illegal to do so. Who cares? These people have been wiping their ass with law and the constitution since 2015. What makes you think being illegal will stop them?
As I said, the moment they made a software update that interfered with the DoD ping, they'd get a visit from some helicopters. Especially since there's no way the update would make it through the legitimate process of approval, so that would mean they have already used their "warning" and couldn't claim "oops it was an accident".
Apple never officially said they would do this. They can simply force an update with a "glitch" that interferes with the alerts.
All they need is 13 days to ID the "bug" and fix it.
This system isn't just for Trump to shitpost. If the moon was gonna crash into us, they'd use this system. If China launched a nuke, they'd use this system. The DoD does NOT leave the validation of this system up to the individual carriers and phone manufacturers. So unless you ALSO believe the DoD has been compromised, you should look at Lin as a LARP. Because if the DoD were compromised, they wouldn't NEED to block alerts, the military would have already arrested Trump for sedition like Pelosi wants.
THEY DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT THE LAW
They don't care. Pointing out how bad it would be for them do so so doesn't matter when you're dealing with companies that don't care.
If you think Lin is a larp, that's fine. But any other arguments are garbage because they are predicated on the idea that these mostly rogue and lawless companies, with a friendly incoming administration, actually give a shit about doing the right thing. They don't.
A sitting President had his campaign illegally spied on AND NOTHING HAPPENED. The fucking POTUS couldn't do anything about the previous admins illegal activity AGAINST HIM. Why would Apple be worried about repercussions when the incoming admin will be sucking Apple's cock?
I'm telling you the EBS works differently. Again, its NOT software based.
I understand what you are saying. YOU ARE WRONG. The phone must be programmed to allow itself to interface with the system. This is controlled via software/firmware which can both be updated.
Stop it.
If they did something that interfered with that system, someone would be going to jail and/or getting fined, and they would be ORDERED under penalty of military forfeiture of their assets to reverse the update immediately.
They would claim it was a "bug", Nothing would happen.
Its a totally different world than blocking the president on Twitter. And the military is OUR GUYS if Q is to be believed, so you better belive they'd be watching for Apple to do this and would be ready to fuck them up.
You have two options here - Q is real. If that is the case these people are part of the cabal and will DO LITERALLY ANYTHING to defend themselves. Threat of jail is irrelevant because they believe they are ALREADY GOING TO JAIL.
Second option is Q is not real. In which case they have no reason to block the EBS and nothing would happen.
If you believe in Q then you must also accept these people are so desperate they will do anything to stop what is coming.
However, we never thought the President of the United States would be denied his 1st Amendment rights so just because the presidential alerts are mandatory doesn’t mean they won’t slip in & change it. Lin has been spot on so I think I have to stand by him. I don’t trust Apple.
No they weren’t. They had all their faith in Pence.
No I wasn’t. Don’t know this letter.
We haven't been hanging with Sidney Powell or being retweeted as a patriot to follow by the president.
Thought that letter was proven to be fake
Probably bc you can’t change minds on the internet. You can only reinforce ideas or predilections.
I don’t care one way or another. I don’t get my information for him, but I do get much entertainment!
Personally, I’ll wait for trump or his family to denounce, or Jan 20 of Biden is sworn in. 10 days! I can hang
Ok Kurt SHILLing
I do agree that what Wood has said only parrots a lot of what we've already been over. Especially in Voat and the Chans.
However, I would say that the fact NO ONE has sued his pants off and moved to disbar him over his accusations when [they] have the money and power to do so is very telling. The only one to be sued so far is Powell, by Dominion. Not only has no one filed suit, not one has come out to deny, debunk, call for a cease and desist, nothing. [Their] silence sure is deafening.
He's also an anti defamation lawyer. He fully knows and understands the implications of his accusations if they're false. I don't think one of the nation's premier anti defamation lawyers would risk career suicide like this over baseless accusations. Powell isn't. Rudy G and Trump's legal team isn't. Why would Wood?
I think you make an important point about Lin echoing the Q zeitgeist. Regardless of whether he knows anymore than the collective "edge-knowledge" of this board and its network counterparts across the chans, it's having a galvanization effect that's not on the whole negative.
I agree with you that people shouldn't be looking to Lin for their epistemological increase, but rather to realize that the name of the game right now is to echo and amplify. Pour fuel on fires, it's not about waiting for instruction. It's about recognizing how to win an information war.
What does Lin have to do with your screenshot?
Just because you have those turned on doesn't mean one has been sent yet...?
Do you really think Apple or Google give a flying fuck about the law right now?
We don't even know if that was a true thing or not, apple hasn't confirmed or denied, Google hasn't said anything...
Until we know - we shouldn't get too wound up. Take precautions, but don't let an unknown consume you.
I believe the good guys will win but the DS (Apple,Google, etc.) doesn't care about violating the law. If they don't lose, none of their bad acts will matter because they won't be prosecuted. If they lose, they'll be on the hook for much worse. So for the DS et al it's balls to the wall, full on scorched earth to "win at any cost".
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Name something the democrats have done that is allowed by law?
Name one reason why they would remove this claim about presidential alerts if they simply wanted to disable them?
President sends an alert > Apple products don't get them > "woops it was a bug! we'll totally get that fixed by the time biden is inaugurated, promise!"
You’re an Irish pos shill.
Lin Wood is a man of God and a patriot. These are 2 things you would know nothing about you limey wannabe faggot.
This is healthy and I like it. Irish, in effect you're raising the EBS signal further by playing the pragmatist. Whether Lin knows anything or not about EBS, I do think he's pretty knowledgeable of media / signal-noise theory and has observed its effects on the flow of information over several years.
He's fundamentally narrative inflating, and that's only bad if folks rely on him or anyone as a source of truth. We're outside the domain of truth now. We're purely in the domain of signal and noise, and the game is to pick and choose what signals to amplify and which to let wash away into the noise.
Cool screenshot.
Why does Lin need to take his "meds"?
Laws! These people haven't followed the law in the last 15 years
I've read most of your replies on this board at this point and you're clearly projecting and freaking out over what amounts to nothing.... take your meds
That's all great, but what does that have to do with the screenshot?
I still don't see the connection with the screenshot.
ELECTION FRAUD IS NOT ALLOWED BY LAW SHILL AND LOOK WHERE WE ARE!
You fascists have proven there is no law and no justice in court. You are just trying to destroy our last trusted sources of Comms. Go away you are so obvious.
Possible that a button is not provided on the phone because it says that these alerts are mandatory.
Possible that a button is not provided on the phone because it says that these alerts are mandatory.
YES....i and by the wordof many other here, found our iPhns in process of updating to 14.3 after reading this news almost 24 hours ago. My phn was loading it to myphn whne i checked, personally...i caught it beforeit finished, and before it started installing..so i was thankful. nice to see so much bashing from mr Irish, on something that is darn near old news and confirmed. Shill harder on Unconfirmed stories mr Irish. This is Way down the feed by now.You are late and looking foolish.
....Also...reading the update from iPhn..it clearly states "Some messages may not be received.." and mentions the EBS....Facts matter
Apple could change the code and remove them completely. Response would be that it was an inadvertent accident. Just cause an option shows doesn't mean its programmed to work.
The fact that you can't turn these off by choice validates what Lin is saying - they need an update to turn off Presidential alerts.
As far as it being illegal to do so. Who cares? These people have been wiping their ass with law and the constitution since 2015. What makes you think being illegal will stop them?
Apple never officially said they would do this. They can simply force an update with a "glitch" that interferes with the alerts.
All they need is 13 days to ID the "bug" and fix it.
THEY DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT THE LAW
They don't care. Pointing out how bad it would be for them do so so doesn't matter when you're dealing with companies that don't care.
If you think Lin is a larp, that's fine. But any other arguments are garbage because they are predicated on the idea that these mostly rogue and lawless companies, with a friendly incoming administration, actually give a shit about doing the right thing. They don't.
A sitting President had his campaign illegally spied on AND NOTHING HAPPENED. The fucking POTUS couldn't do anything about the previous admins illegal activity AGAINST HIM. Why would Apple be worried about repercussions when the incoming admin will be sucking Apple's cock?
I understand what you are saying. YOU ARE WRONG. The phone must be programmed to allow itself to interface with the system. This is controlled via software/firmware which can both be updated.
Stop it.
They would claim it was a "bug", Nothing would happen.
You have two options here - Q is real. If that is the case these people are part of the cabal and will DO LITERALLY ANYTHING to defend themselves. Threat of jail is irrelevant because they believe they are ALREADY GOING TO JAIL.
Second option is Q is not real. In which case they have no reason to block the EBS and nothing would happen.
If you believe in Q then you must also accept these people are so desperate they will do anything to stop what is coming.
Yes I know. That's exactly why phones would need to employ software/firmware to negotiate with the EBS signal.
Should be obvious.
Did you get an update?
Just because YOU cant turn it off doesn't mean apple can't. Or whoops what terrible timing for a "bug" in the latest update!