Their big reason? They say a scatter plot shows two clearly distinct collections of dots. The chart showed a clear difference in style between the first Q messages from October 28 to Dec 1 2017. “The signal difference is strong enough to leave very little doubt on this authors swap.”
I checked out the drops between then, that’s when Q started signing his posts with a Q at the end. He started in November and by December he’s always signing Q at the end.
I think that was their big finding because they can’t analyze anything about the speech patterns because they say literally nothing else about their findings other than they are certain it’s 2 people.
Switzerland was nicknamed "the porcupine" – unlike the rest of Europe, they had a well armed civilian populace, and they had heavily fortified borders. All their mountain tunnels, roads and passes were trip-wired to blow up and effectively seal off access ... Germany wanted to invade, but knew it just wasn't feasible.
In Ireland, anger and distrust toward the UK was still strong (the brutal Irish war of independence was still fresh in people's memories) and officially they preferred to be neutral, rather than ally themselves with the UK. That said, there were many Irish citizens that crossed the channel and enlisted in the British army to fight the Axis.
Hitler was fine with Ireland remaining neutral, as it helped isolate the UK. I was told by an Irishman—not sure how true it is—the Germans had at some point accidentally bombed an Irish port city (fog of war, literally; the bombers were trying for Liverpool or Manchester but got lost in the channel fog) and Hitler actually sent a formal letter of apology to the Irish government because he didn't want to risk getting them angry and joining the fight.
Even if Q is two people, how would that change the idea that Q is military intelligence? I assume that something like Q would need multiple authors, at least for anything important.
Got a marketing guy who writes the post,
Directors and CEOs sign off .
Maybe marketing guy got promoted or reassigned and another writer took over.
If you were to ask me how many writers of I were to guess Id say 2. One at the begining, and then another took over after about or less than a year.
Honestly, this type of task could be accomplished bt AI, and maybe what we are witnessing is different versions of an AI that is used to assist in the creation of posts.
Like an AI codec. You type what you want to convey to your friendly as well as your enemy, and it encodes it into a Q post that is vague, but affects both the friendly any enemy targets and ties them together through some sort of patttern.
They love to play on people’s ignorance and fears. lol They clearly haven’t figured out how to spin Q posts into “violence”. Just trust them. It was instrumental. Reasons.
I do appreciate them reaffirming for me that I am on the right side of this.
A lot of “holes” in this Swiss piece. You’d think by now they’d at least get the name right. But hey, for the next time they figure out Q’s identity maybe they’ll know that “Qanon” is media created and there is only Q and anons.
For anyone here who may be new. If you are researching and come across something using “Qanon”, it’s probably a hit-piece or trying to steer you in a particular direction.
Although this story has relatively new dates and timestamps, its a very old news story. This study was doing the rounds on the 8kun boards well over a year ago.. maybe even as early as 2018.
And even with the slanderous framing of the article - totally normal for hit pieces, and mandatory for any fake news article on Q.. the great revelation is really a big nothing. Q is a team or has multiple contributors rather than being a single individual! Is that supposed to be bad? I think if anything, its a positive.
Their big reason? They say a scatter plot shows two clearly distinct collections of dots. The chart showed a clear difference in style between the first Q messages from October 28 to Dec 1 2017. “The signal difference is strong enough to leave very little doubt on this authors swap.”
I checked out the drops between then, that’s when Q started signing his posts with a Q at the end. He started in November and by December he’s always signing Q at the end.
I think that was their big finding because they can’t analyze anything about the speech patterns because they say literally nothing else about their findings other than they are certain it’s 2 people.
Qanon only exists in their heads.
Q is just an idea, man.
Would upvote this, but it's already at 17!
Upvoted comment to match. ;)
Which, oddly enough, benefits Q's team.
Is that why it was left alone in the world wars?
What about ireland?
If everything goes to plan, we will see Klaus Shwab's head on a pike
^^^THIS^^^ don't mess with the vault
Switzerland was nicknamed "the porcupine" – unlike the rest of Europe, they had a well armed civilian populace, and they had heavily fortified borders. All their mountain tunnels, roads and passes were trip-wired to blow up and effectively seal off access ... Germany wanted to invade, but knew it just wasn't feasible.
In Ireland, anger and distrust toward the UK was still strong (the brutal Irish war of independence was still fresh in people's memories) and officially they preferred to be neutral, rather than ally themselves with the UK. That said, there were many Irish citizens that crossed the channel and enlisted in the British army to fight the Axis.
Hitler was fine with Ireland remaining neutral, as it helped isolate the UK. I was told by an Irishman—not sure how true it is—the Germans had at some point accidentally bombed an Irish port city (fog of war, literally; the bombers were trying for Liverpool or Manchester but got lost in the channel fog) and Hitler actually sent a formal letter of apology to the Irish government because he didn't want to risk getting them angry and joining the fight.
About the propaganda in our(switzerland) media, we just copy and past AP, Reuters. So whatever the US Empire wats to push, we publish.
They used emoji analysis like on south park. Quick, get skankhunt43.
I agree. I remember anons calling it out as to whether they were legit or not because the posts had changed.
Swiss experts!!! Switzerland is literally HQ for the eyes wide shut assholes. LMAO
Even if Q is two people, how would that change the idea that Q is military intelligence? I assume that something like Q would need multiple authors, at least for anything important.
Yeah like a corporation
Got a marketing guy who writes the post, Directors and CEOs sign off .
Maybe marketing guy got promoted or reassigned and another writer took over.
If you were to ask me how many writers of I were to guess Id say 2. One at the begining, and then another took over after about or less than a year.
Honestly, this type of task could be accomplished bt AI, and maybe what we are witnessing is different versions of an AI that is used to assist in the creation of posts.
Like an AI codec. You type what you want to convey to your friendly as well as your enemy, and it encodes it into a Q post that is vague, but affects both the friendly any enemy targets and ties them together through some sort of patttern.
Misinfo is their hallmark
Poppycock
Hogwash!
Balderdash.
"According to Swiss experts"...LOL.
They love to play on people’s ignorance and fears. lol They clearly haven’t figured out how to spin Q posts into “violence”. Just trust them. It was instrumental. Reasons.
I do appreciate them reaffirming for me that I am on the right side of this.
Q pissed off the deepstate. /s
A lot of “holes” in this Swiss piece. You’d think by now they’d at least get the name right. But hey, for the next time they figure out Q’s identity maybe they’ll know that “Qanon” is media created and there is only Q and anons.
For anyone here who may be new. If you are researching and come across something using “Qanon”, it’s probably a hit-piece or trying to steer you in a particular direction.
Although this story has relatively new dates and timestamps, its a very old news story. This study was doing the rounds on the 8kun boards well over a year ago.. maybe even as early as 2018.
And even with the slanderous framing of the article - totally normal for hit pieces, and mandatory for any fake news article on Q.. the great revelation is really a big nothing. Q is a team or has multiple contributors rather than being a single individual! Is that supposed to be bad? I think if anything, its a positive.
haha -for some, it does
3rd time MSM has claimed to know Q's identity.
Ron and Jim?
Lmao they don't even have a reveal. This whole article isn't even a hit piece. Its just a giant advertisement for whatever job these nobodies do
There just trying to spin up they algorithm analysis as something meaningful. Like that doctor that claimed to diagnose cancer in famous paintings.
The two witnesses... Kidding. Alas poor yorick