I haven't been able to find any sauce for this clam, but I see quite a few anons making that claim. Does anyone have the receipts?
Edit: Thanks, guys. I don't listen to Ward or Simon Parks, so that claim seemed to pop up out of nowhere, with lots of folks claiming it was truth. Being a critical thinker, I never believe anything before I've seen it for myself. Since no one has seen any proof, I call this debonked.
yeah I don't buy this at all. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN SAUCE. and fuck Charlie ward for saying this shit without posting any evidence. I'm sick of hearing this guy's name in the comments. I say we spend this weekend purging anything and everything without receipts.
Yeah, in my day job I negotiate contracts for my company, because of this I have become quite adept at sniffing out bullshit. Charlie Ward wreaks of it. His body language and his tone/word choice screams to me that he was full of shit while making that comment.
inept adjective
Save Word
To save this word, you'll need to log in.
Log In
in·ept | \ i-ˈnept \
Definition of inept
1: generally incompetent : BUNGLINGinept leadership
2: lacking in fitness or aptitude : UNFITinept at sports
3: not suitable to the time, place, or occasion : inappropriate often to an absurd degreean inept metaphor
4: lacking sense or reason : FOOLISH
inept adjective
Save Word
To save this word, you'll need to log in.
Log In
in·ept | \ i-ˈnept \
Definition of inept
1: generally incompetent : BUNGLINGinept leadership
2: lacking in fitness or aptitude : UNFITinept at sports
3: not suitable to the time, place, or occasion : inappropriate often to an absurd degreean inept metaphor
4: lacking sense or reason : FOOLISH
Lmao, adept was what I meant, but I have to admit that was a pretty funny typo. Fixed ty.
Apparently, Charlotte Ward doesn't own a cell phone with a video camera.
I think there is a fine line between spitballing theories that are based on speculation and posting verifiable information, and it can often come down to the language of the post. The same word can mean different things to different people, for example.
I agree, we should have sources for our main points, and should be clear when we are speculating. But I also don't think there is anything wrong with making a post about your thoughts, because sometimes it will help another anon's lightbulb click on.
Besides the obvious shills, I think we all have the best in mind, we just have different methods. There has been so much division after the 6th, we shouldn't become part of that problem.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say:
a) no
b) even if it were, on super-slim remote conceivable chance, maybe true... it's still a total red-herring waste of time... and if far more likely to be well-poisoning disinformation I know it sounds luridly bizarre, and that, in and of itself, is compelling... but if it were actually true, you'd already know for 100% sure.
A thousand, hundred, 10, even 1 tweet, with a photo of the tv screen, saying “Hey, why is the us inauguration on now” would have sufficed. Been an effective time stamp. Been almost certain.
Are there any?
It's fake
I've seen "people from spain" deny it in comments on here; seems like it'd be easy to figure out if it were true.
That’s only one I heard
Not true.
Unfortunately, that seems to be the norm around here, rather than the exception. :0( I hate it when people post false hopium.
If it had happened it would've been spread all over the internet well before the actual event was held, duh
All I've seen is an image of Gaga singing in her ignorguration outfit that was labelled a week prior despite being ostensibly from the 20th.
"ignorguration" Yes!
Charlie Ward said it multiple times.
We’re looking for proof not one guy said it with absolutely 0 proof
he's trolling you
This was spanish media at 9am (3am in DC) 9 hours before the ceremony they were saying how it was going to be. It's impossible that they streamed it 10 hours early. Rest of the channels were the same. https://www.antena3internacional.com/actualidad/noticias/noticias/a-toma-de-posesion-de-joe-biden-y-kamala-harris_2021012060080b1419cdca0001cef9d6.html
Did you even click the video?
9:00 https://i.maga.host/mDZsZQO.png
Also yes, noon in DC is 6pm (18:00) in Madrid. Media never uses "pm" and "am"
I know, he's a mixed bag
Why do you believe Charlie Ward without him posting some type of legitimate "proof"? If the Spain video exits then why hasn't anyone posted a single link to its source? I quit believing anything from Charlie Ward, Simon Parks, and Danielle when I saw this: https://www.simonparkes.org/post/danielle-charlie-ward-and-simon-parkes. Note their giddiness about how they JUST LEARNED from their secret inside sources this "massive news" of a surprise "declaration of war" against China by Trump based on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13959. This EO was actually signed and PUBLISHED MONTHS EARLIER on 11/12 (https://www.trumpwhitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-addressing-threat-securities-investments-finance-communist-chinese-military-companies/), and it was immediately discussed in financial/ other media https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-china-securities-idUSKBN27T1MD. So it's obviously not even close to a "surprise" declaration of war on China. Also note that in hindsight we've yet to see ANY meaningful repercussions at all from this EO. This is only one of many examples of their ridiculous claims. Please check out their background before assigning credibility to ANYONE in this atmosphere of lies everywhere coming from all sides!
He's full of it.
So if it wasn't aired 10 hours early, this could be a way to get us to examine the inauguration and come up with our own conclusions.
Charlie Ward said it in an interview on January 20, 2021.
Link: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BVRCyEOAH5ex/
I had the link to the stream and time stamp, but it has been scrubbed. Sorry, the enemy works fast.