What if this second impeachment was part of the plan? We all know the second impeachment was completely unprecedented and inexplicably voted on at the last moment. Figuratively, it doesn't make much sense at all unless you consider the vindictive nature of the swamp. Even so... Why rush to impeach with only a few days left in office to only then delay the proceedings in the Senate for another 30 days at least?
What if DECLAS is Trump's impeachment trial!? In a frivolous impeachment hearing, he could unload anything and everything! Legal, public, and the evidence that the defense brings forward would deliver the wake up slap millions of normies need. Will the second impeachment trial of DJT be the DECLAS event for the public? It fits the craziness of all this being scripted or preplanned. Explains the military presence through March (legitimately security after all) and allows Trump to use the whole series of events against the DS. Total Sun Tzu move. Checkmate?!
This forum has become important post January 6. There are meaningful and self aware conversations going on in every thread. When members are correcting each other they both delivering and accepting the differing ideas with grace. I’m not giving much of my opinion but am really enjoying reading everyone else’s and upvoting the good ones.
I appreciate all who are participating in this civility.
Thank you for this encouraging and sentimental comment! Yes, this is what we as bakers and diggers are here for. Asking the important questions and discerning the truth where the light shines.
Well that and dank-ass memes. We have the best memes folks.
And don’t forget this bad boy waiting in the shadows: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/memorandum-attorney-generals-authority-use-classified-information-connection-review-intelligence-activities/. This EO on using classified docs in court cases OR OTHER PROCEEDINGS allows Durham to show classified documents when he deems fit.
Oh shit! Potentially very relevant. All Durham has to do is unwrap what he deems consequential and fall back on that very argument for doing so.
Well since you brought it up... Here's what we've been working on now that you mention it - Durham probably during impeachment trial
I really don't think that Durham is real, given that there are only two pictures and no movies of the dude, and that Durham boat was used during Washington crossing, heck of coincidence. So my guess is that he's fictional used only in paper trail or will be made just like Obama out of nothing, played by an actor.
He specifically denies requests to reporters for profiles: https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/11/john-durham-last-trusted-prosecutor-in-washington/. Not saying this disproves your theory, but it would support the idea that he tries to maintain anonymity, thus not much info or images of him online.
Holy SHIT fren; that is an EPIC article on Durham!!!
DAMN I feel so much better knowing he’s a special prosecutor after [them] AND it makes perfect sense now why he seems to be such a ghost;
HE IS. On purpose!
Fascinating, epic article.... Thanks again!!!
Yes, maybe if search engines were suppressing his pics on purpose I would believe this, but no worries, I don't mind white hats using the same tricks that bad guys use. ;)
Same think Watnik did for the longest time. Ghosted the MSM and stayed off social media.
Someone posted a picture of him next to Bruce Willis........ The resemblance was uncanny. Very odd.....
Trump declassed Fisagate docs on the 19th, right? But we didn't see anything from it. What if, now that it is all declassed, it can be used in the peach mint trial? While those don't negate the charges that have been placed for impeachment, they should show complete and utter malfeasance by a ton of people, which in turn makes the articles null and void and shows the world the truth.
One can hope
The dems are starting to wake up to the bad idea that it is. It would greatly delay confirmations. However I think the clock is running out on their little scam, military and we the people are breathing down their neck. The necks soon to be stretched.
That's what we all thought for the first impeachment and NOTHING came of it.
I'm hoping that it's all done before Feb. If not, that give Idiot46 too much time in the chair and takes away from REAL time for POTUS45.
Maybe not the election fraud but it was thought (FISAgate?) declass would happen.
And every bit of evidence presented becomes part of the Congressional Record.
I don't like the idea, but it might be true. I'd prefer for them to just lift up the curtain and disclose the arrests, but that's just me. And I don't, and nor does anybody else, get to vote on that part of the operation. I'll keep the popcorn close in case it gets good.
Yes, it is one of my theories too. But there needs even more buildup to it. Like state AGs doing SOMETHING!
This legal system is a joke. I swear. Totally corrupt. These people haven't even read the Constitution!
So if there is a build-up towards taking legal action, then DECLAS could take many days during the Impeachment trials.
If it doesn't happen before march, then all of this US corporation stuff is bull and now for it is our only hopium shot.
We must wait until spring...." The world be saved as the blossoms of spring spout so shall the world". Doesn't mean a lot of things won't be revealed between now and then but it's still gonna be a minute... I agree that this is a time of revelation, "All must be revealed for the great awakening to happen. For you can tell a man something is true and hope it will be believed but to show a man something is true, breeds acceptance" Free will must come into play.. they must come willingly... Blessings to you
It's why GEOTUS has his law team in place, I wonder what they will find during discovery, or already know?
Precisely! Couple this theory with Durham slowly going from the bottom up unsealing indictments during (before & after also) the same timeframe and the DS will publicly drown in tandem with the higher hanging fruit incriminating themselves during the proceedings.
Just spit-balling this morning over coffee. With all of the out of place puzzle pieces this scenario has potential to fit some of them together.
I just wish they could at least finish up the edges. Puzzles always seem easier after the edges are in place?
Interesting idea, but explain why Pelosi would be pushing it, besides relying on other theories that she's already arrested. I'm not saying that can't be the case, but see Occam's Razor.
This theory can work if she is arrested or not. Actually makes more sense if she is being controlled.
I'm looking at the broader picture of the second impeachment being planned to occur. Whether by white hats or simply a salty vindictive congress, it doesn't matter. This scenario would've been planned for and tactically used accordingly.
Are you saying Pelosi impeached because she's a vindictive cunt, and had no foresight that a trial would bring evidence against her? Again, ignoring the theory she's being controlled by white hats to set herself up.
Well it certainly isn't that hard to imagine. They are in fact both hateful and stupid.
If Pelosi is controlled, then why the delay with congress for a week?
I think the answer is more simple: You impeach a president to remove him from office. He still holds the office.
If their goal were simply to stop him from winning in 2024, why not just cheat again in the election, or even in the primaries?
If we're watching a movie, she might have been forced to do all of this. If the NSA has all the goods on every deepstate player, we might have already been watching a movie for the past 3 to 4 years.
The end goal here is not just to arrest the bad guys, it's also about preventing civil war. To prevent civil war the normies have to wake up and they have to be slowly herded towards their awakening, through a step by step narrative that's laid out for them.
Hence why I said "besides theories that she's already been arrested." Appreciate the reply, but yes, already familiar with these ideas, looking outside that box.
I heard a lawyer, possibly Dershowitz, say there would NOT be a trial because of the potential evidence that could/would be presented.
Link?
Sorry, it was Newsmax interview a week ago!