I have no doubt Congress was in on it, however being agreeable and knowledgeable are two separate issues. Most of Congress have no idea what is in the bills they vote for. They vote because that's what they are told to do.
In regard to the primary question as to why evidence of election fraud coming out mattering, the more truth comes to light the better. There is a reason why media frames it as without evidence without actually ever mentioning any of the claims. They fear the truth.
I was just exactly asking the same question, if they refused to hear the evidence who can we possibly go to? Provided the militaries in charge and has the evidence is what we've been told, I think that is the only final thing that we can count on, but still I do have that same question you're asking I want to know
I think the point is that so far, courts have all refused to actually review the evidence. If they take him to trial over impeachment, then they are forcing the court to allow discovery. This means Trump finally has the chance to lay it all out with the public seeing the evidence at last and then watching what the court does.
We are in an information war with the left. The more opportunities to expose the low info US pop to the truth, the better for the US to unify. If we can show how much we have all been lied too, the better for all.
I keep hoping for electronic intercepts (phone calls, finances, etc) showing chain of events leading from elected officials to (China?) to election workers, etc etc
To me, that is pretty much the only evidence that would be solid enough to convince people of the crime AND get the criminals indicted.
Congress will never do what is right they are fucked either way they go if they allow Trump to be President he shuts down the swamp and shows the world the corruption that was in congress and they go to jail for a long time. Or they stay and the world finds out later than sooner and they go every single one of those child diddlers need to die.
It should allow for discovery in the case.
When arguing with anyone in front of people, you don't win by convincing that person you are right. You win by convincing the onlooking crowd.
You assume that Congress, let alone most people have any idea of the facts, which I'd argue is grossly incorrect.
I have no doubt Congress was in on it, however being agreeable and knowledgeable are two separate issues. Most of Congress have no idea what is in the bills they vote for. They vote because that's what they are told to do.
In regard to the primary question as to why evidence of election fraud coming out mattering, the more truth comes to light the better. There is a reason why media frames it as without evidence without actually ever mentioning any of the claims. They fear the truth.
I was just exactly asking the same question, if they refused to hear the evidence who can we possibly go to? Provided the militaries in charge and has the evidence is what we've been told, I think that is the only final thing that we can count on, but still I do have that same question you're asking I want to know
I think the point is that so far, courts have all refused to actually review the evidence. If they take him to trial over impeachment, then they are forcing the court to allow discovery. This means Trump finally has the chance to lay it all out with the public seeing the evidence at last and then watching what the court does.
We are in an information war with the left. The more opportunities to expose the low info US pop to the truth, the better for the US to unify. If we can show how much we have all been lied too, the better for all.
I dont forget. There is a special place in hell for the RINO Traitors of the soon dead GOP.
Yea who the fuck knows. This is all some theater anyway.
I keep hoping for electronic intercepts (phone calls, finances, etc) showing chain of events leading from elected officials to (China?) to election workers, etc etc
To me, that is pretty much the only evidence that would be solid enough to convince people of the crime AND get the criminals indicted.
Yeah like ANY court system can EVER be trusted again. I think it’s mute point. WHY would he take that chance?
Because the military is involved. It's obvious at this point.
It doesn't make sense but we have to see how far they are willing to take this impeachment trial.
I thought I read somewhere thatCrooked Chief Justice Roberts wasn't even going to entertain proceeding over a 2nd Impeachment Trial for Trump.
Because he knows what will happen, and it will specifically show his dereliction of duty.
knowing and proving are two different things
I think we have to accept that exposure is really what the plan is. Planting the seed so that the real america can return.
I no longer think it's like ripping the band aid off. It's more a slow burn awakening where people realize on their own instead of being forced fed
Congress will never do what is right they are fucked either way they go if they allow Trump to be President he shuts down the swamp and shows the world the corruption that was in congress and they go to jail for a long time. Or they stay and the world finds out later than sooner and they go every single one of those child diddlers need to die.
The 50M libs haven't heard it.
And they won’t because it’s hard to hear much of anything when your head is so far in your ass, you can wear yourself for a hat.
I agree that it is probably a hopeless exercise although it will put it in the record for historical purposes.
It may also be a great venue if any new information is to be revealed.
Trump and the Patriots will put Congress on trial.