If the evidence were presented in the SCOTUS, interested, research-oriented Americans would pay attention and some would tune in. A few interested foreigners would follow the SCOTUS proceedings.
But the second trial of Donald John Trump in the United States Senate will be riveting for much of the industrial world. Many millions will be glued to the proceedings. They will follow it day by day as the horrors of the cabal are revealed.
And the incredibly stupid people who are sponsoring this great world circus don't even realize what an immense favor they are doing us. President Trump gets discovery. He can lead the trial into all the election crimes and the Biden family crimes. Those touch on the DNC and the Clintons and thence to U1 and the Awan spy-ring-in-Congress scandal, CIA drug trafficking and the Mina airport. It all will be revealed with a worldwide audience.
It's the firecracker in their ridiculous house of crime cards. The whole thing gets blown off the table.
The criminal class is in for a rough February. It's going to be something to watch. Stock up on popcorn early, there's going to be a run on the grocery stores.
Dems just put an ultra partisan DS hack in charge of the impeachment. Roberts bowed out and now it's Patrick Leahy. We will have to see if any evidence is even allowed.
Per the constitution, this is unconstitutional, correct? Roberts has to be the one to preside?
I've only seen evidence that says Roberts has to be the judge.
Yes I know dems don't care about the constituion.
Chief Justice Roberts only has to preside over a Constitutional impeachments of a President. Roberts Choosing not to go is proof that this Impeachment Trial is not Constitutional.
I guess we'll have to see what the Trump legal team does...
So if they did "convict", Trump really is not disqualified from running again?
Illegal acts are supposedly null and void.
Correct
Bingo!
Hmmm.... Chief Justice must preside over a Presidential election.
How would this work for a past President???
Does that change things?
Seems like a slippery slope... but.
the fact they are doing a trial for a past president is gotta be unconstitutional
If Robert's is stepping aside, suggests there is legal proceedings that need him elsewhere.
Like, maybe, finding out he is on a certain set of flight logs.
No. The constitution clearly states that the Chief Justice has to preside over the impeachment. It doesn't say some asshole below him or next to him can do it.
Well some military asshole can though can’t they
Constitution doesn’t matter anymore. Going forward, it’s just Trump and Q...and that’s a good thing.
Apparently you missed the last line of the post
Considering the jig is up and eyes are open I wouldnt be so confident in that cause you won’t be laughing for long faggot jogger
The OP is completely wrong about how impeachments work, dems control everything, there absolutely won't be a revelation of crimes.
Hopium has turned into an addiction, preventing us from seeing clearly
Didn't expect them to pick someone even OLDER than Biden but here we are. fucking honk honk clown world
"Leaky Leahy" is one of the worst pricks in the Dem. party. Trump will never get a fair trial with him presiding.
Isn't it just for show as this is supposed to be a military tribunal of sorts?
Who knows but it’s plausible especially if Roberts isn’t trying it, the military would be the only one above him to be able to do so
The military isn’t “above” Roberts, whatever that is supposed to mean.
Any evidence is allowed? It’s a trial that’s the whole point Christ how do people tie there shoes
They didn't even present any in the House, it just went straight to a vote. You think these people care about law and courtrooms at this point?