Yes. Pure ignorance on the part of those who claim to be journalists. It is a dying career - from the perspective of a classically trained journalist who respects the tenets of fair and unbiased reporting. Today's media is a fucking joke.
Why? No. It's the best opportunity to let listeners know that someone is full of shit.
You're sitting with friends, one keeps ragging on QAnon. The usual MSM tirades. You let them talk for a while. Let the people listen. Then, eventually, you go: "Who is QAnon?" - Inevitably nonsensical response, here - "Well, how much can I trust what you are saying, when you don't even get the name right? There is no QAnon, the name is.... [red pilling ensues]"
Remember to call it QAnon and remind people of the one crazy QAnon person you saw on Facebook who said it's not QAnon, there's Q and there are Anons. Like, what is that supposed to even mean, right?
Nope, whenever I hear it I know to prepare myself for a deluge of bullshit
no. don't let words hurt you. we aren't lefties.
Words still matter to us entirely because we aren't Lefties.
Yes.
You are not the only one.
Rush used to say ... if someone is making a fool of themselves ... why not let them.
No, it exposes them.
Yes, MSM gave them that term.
This is a major concern I stay very very awake at night just overall mad and pondering this as well
Nah it doesn't piss me off it just let's me know who to ignore if they can't get a simple detail like this correct.
Yes. Pure ignorance on the part of those who claim to be journalists. It is a dying career - from the perspective of a classically trained journalist who respects the tenets of fair and unbiased reporting. Today's media is a fucking joke.
I did at first, but not anymore.
You may nitpick semantics all you want, but to me they are interchangeable.
No, because it's either pettiness or ignorance. I ignore pettiness and address the ignorance then go about my life.
No. Actually glad they have no idea what goes on here. Anyone spending just an hour here can get the basics and would know about Q and Anons.
That's what it said on his birth certificate.
He just shortened it to "Q".
Back in the day it wasnt seen as a big deal... here is an awesome old song by that name: https://tootssweet.com/track/1754094/q-anon
Average joe here: Q is an anon identity. And so thats all I associated it with was that Q is anonymous, we don't know who Q is or are.
No
Why? No. It's the best opportunity to let listeners know that someone is full of shit.
You're sitting with friends, one keeps ragging on QAnon. The usual MSM tirades. You let them talk for a while. Let the people listen. Then, eventually, you go: "Who is QAnon?" - Inevitably nonsensical response, here - "Well, how much can I trust what you are saying, when you don't even get the name right? There is no QAnon, the name is.... [red pilling ensues]"
I dont know that much about Q, but when someone refers to it as Qanon, I know they dont know.
Remember to call it QAnon and remind people of the one crazy QAnon person you saw on Facebook who said it's not QAnon, there's Q and there are Anons. Like, what is that supposed to even mean, right?
Ugh Simon Parkes.??♂️
Same. Who cares. Just get the information out. Names don't matter.