In order for this to be a proof, you have to use statistics. Obviously how convincing this would have to do with how many Q drops per day on average, and how many Trump posts per day on average.
But then you'd have to take into account strategies that Q could use if Q were a larp. For example, Q could wait until Q+ was doing a tweetstorm and then try to anticipate a good time to make a drop. If you miss, it doesn't matter, because it doesn't count against you. I.E. the above analysis only counts Q drops that right before Trump tweets.
So I think that this proof is pretty useless for convincing normies.
I think the 30-day delta to the minute on No Name's death announcement is a much better proof. I worked out the probabilities of that once and it was nigh impossible to be a coincidence.
This proof is probably one of the easiest to follow and most convincing to normies. There is much more context to the data that is not included in the explanation because it would end up being too complicated, but it clears most concerns about the proof. A simple way to analyze this would be the following. Look at a set of Twitter accounts that have a similar number of tweets as Q has posts. Check to see how many times the Twitter accounts have 0-delta posts. I have a feeling you won't find many or any that are close to 9 0-delta posts.
Edit: This should be doable by using the awesome-twitter-data dataset.
The delta proofs were extremely convincing to me when presented in the Ultimate Q Proofs video. It's still on youtube if you're interested. The video made it clear that delta proofs were NOT occurring during tweet storms by the president. He also showed how Q used markers to indicate that a delta proof was incoming. It wasn't just strictly about the timing of the tweets, there were other factors. They are 100% proof to me. Undeniable!
Clip that. Skip ahead to 42 minutes and you'll reach the section on deltas. Those are what convinced me. If you watch those and still think the concept is invalid I would be interested to hear your opinion. Those are the proofs that convinced me of the concept.
Did you apply the same logic to this proof? How many times did Q post about NN? How many times did he post about other people? How many times did a post about someone line up with their death? Why 30 days?
Q said 'No Name back in the News'. There was no news about No Name at the time.
I worked out all the probabilities, and decided that it was a best Q proof by a longshot because it is a stand-alone. It did not depend on unlikely things 'stacking'.
The thing about that proof is that it was down to the *minute. And it wasn't like there was a flurry of No Name news items. There was just the death notice.
Did all the other things he said about NN correlate to anything? Like when he said "No name absent. End near?"
Anyway, let's say he did know the time of his death to the minute. What does that prove? That he can see the future? That he can tell people what date to give as his time of death?
No, there were no major stories about his health at the time that Q make the drop, nor in the next 30 days.
The next NN drop: Every dog has its day. That was the hint that would be in 30 days, near National Dog Day.
Anyway, let's say he did know the time of his death to the minute. What does that prove? That he can see the future? That he can tell people what date to give as his time of death?
A military tribunal trial, the defendant gets 1 and only 1 appeal, and it can't go over 30 days. I assume they can enforce the sentence immediately after the 30 days are up.
So the answer to my last question is that Q knew the point at which he had a 30 day limit. So he announced his execution by saying that he would be "in the headlines". Then they executed him those 30 days later and announced the time of his death based on Q's post. Meanwhile, the MSM was talking about him having brain cancer because they knew he was going to be executed.
I think they made a deal with the McCain family. They would keep his crimes hidden in return for announcing the death at exactly a particular time.
This is the only way I can that Q could have predicted exactly 30 days to the minute. The other interesting thing is that the news stories reported the exact time to the minute of the announcement.
I would also point out that there had been no updates on the brain cancer in a while. It is very unclear what the MSM knows and doesn't know. I think most of them are not in the loop.
The only part of it that is important as a Proof is that Q out of the blue made a post of No Name with his hands up, with the words 'No Name back in the news' or similar. And then exactly 30 days later to the minute was the announcement.
Your suggestion that this is substandard as a Q proof is absurd.
Understand that my criticism of the Q proof is not that the math is wrong.
My criticism is that the detail involved in the calculations becomes very complicated with many many variables that have to be accounted for and explained.
It is not a useful proof for convincing normies, because you need to know all these details about how often POTUS tweets, how often the drops come, etc etc.
Percentage is irrelevant. Calculate the statistical P value and it's impossible for it to be a coincidence.
(Take a barrel of 5000 apples, 9 of which contain a deadly poison. The percentage is tiny but you wouldn't want to eat even one!)
In any case, proving that Q is an insider was a very small part of the process. The major part was to disseminate disinformation in order to screw up the plans of the deep state. The other part was to sew "crumbs" for autists to research in order to wake people up to what was happening.
The invading Syria part is bs, we're not invading anyone. Joe has no control over our military. If anyone is doing anything in Syria, it's not who they say it is.
Q, if you're still out there, you're probably perusing parts of this board and I hope you read this. I pray to God for you and the President. President Trump, we miss you! God Bless you, and God Bless America.
or some one spying at twitter on his acount and using the fact that he had 9 tweets he was composing in the ap to fake a proof. Twiitter was involved wlth running Q
Read your scriptures, pray with all your heart, and ask God to prevail in your life.
Amen.
In order for this to be a proof, you have to use statistics. Obviously how convincing this would have to do with how many Q drops per day on average, and how many Trump posts per day on average.
But then you'd have to take into account strategies that Q could use if Q were a larp. For example, Q could wait until Q+ was doing a tweetstorm and then try to anticipate a good time to make a drop. If you miss, it doesn't matter, because it doesn't count against you. I.E. the above analysis only counts Q drops that right before Trump tweets.
So I think that this proof is pretty useless for convincing normies.
I think the 30-day delta to the minute on No Name's death announcement is a much better proof. I worked out the probabilities of that once and it was nigh impossible to be a coincidence.
This proof is probably one of the easiest to follow and most convincing to normies. There is much more context to the data that is not included in the explanation because it would end up being too complicated, but it clears most concerns about the proof. A simple way to analyze this would be the following. Look at a set of Twitter accounts that have a similar number of tweets as Q has posts. Check to see how many times the Twitter accounts have 0-delta posts. I have a feeling you won't find many or any that are close to 9 0-delta posts.
Edit: This should be doable by using the awesome-twitter-data dataset.
The delta proofs were extremely convincing to me when presented in the Ultimate Q Proofs video. It's still on youtube if you're interested. The video made it clear that delta proofs were NOT occurring during tweet storms by the president. He also showed how Q used markers to indicate that a delta proof was incoming. It wasn't just strictly about the timing of the tweets, there were other factors. They are 100% proof to me. Undeniable!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/LHcg3CYHLGoR/
Clip that. Skip ahead to 42 minutes and you'll reach the section on deltas. Those are what convinced me. If you watch those and still think the concept is invalid I would be interested to hear your opinion. Those are the proofs that convinced me of the concept.
Did you apply the same logic to this proof? How many times did Q post about NN? How many times did he post about other people? How many times did a post about someone line up with their death? Why 30 days?
Absolutely.
Q said 'No Name back in the News'. There was no news about No Name at the time.
I worked out all the probabilities, and decided that it was a best Q proof by a longshot because it is a stand-alone. It did not depend on unlikely things 'stacking'.
The thing about that proof is that it was down to the *minute. And it wasn't like there was a flurry of No Name news items. There was just the death notice.
There was no news about his brain cancer?
Did all the other things he said about NN correlate to anything? Like when he said "No name absent. End near?"
Anyway, let's say he did know the time of his death to the minute. What does that prove? That he can see the future? That he can tell people what date to give as his time of death?
No, there were no major stories about his health at the time that Q make the drop, nor in the next 30 days.
The next NN drop: Every dog has its day. That was the hint that would be in 30 days, near National Dog Day.
A military tribunal trial, the defendant gets 1 and only 1 appeal, and it can't go over 30 days. I assume they can enforce the sentence immediately after the 30 days are up.
You are wasting your time.
I'm just asking you to cover your bases fren.
So the answer to my last question is that Q knew the point at which he had a 30 day limit. So he announced his execution by saying that he would be "in the headlines". Then they executed him those 30 days later and announced the time of his death based on Q's post. Meanwhile, the MSM was talking about him having brain cancer because they knew he was going to be executed.
Does that sum up what you're proposing?
I think they made a deal with the McCain family. They would keep his crimes hidden in return for announcing the death at exactly a particular time.
This is the only way I can that Q could have predicted exactly 30 days to the minute. The other interesting thing is that the news stories reported the exact time to the minute of the announcement.
I would also point out that there had been no updates on the brain cancer in a while. It is very unclear what the MSM knows and doesn't know. I think most of them are not in the loop.
The only part of it that is important as a Proof is that Q out of the blue made a post of No Name with his hands up, with the words 'No Name back in the news' or similar. And then exactly 30 days later to the minute was the announcement.
But he also made like 7 or 8 other posts about him after the brain cancer was announced, relevant if you're taking a logical look at this.
Understand that my criticism of the Q proof is not that the math is wrong.
My criticism is that the detail involved in the calculations becomes very complicated with many many variables that have to be accounted for and explained.
It is not a useful proof for convincing normies, because you need to know all these details about how often POTUS tweets, how often the drops come, etc etc.
Out of the total of 4953 Q posts, only 9 times? Seems like a very low percentage of times being in sync.
Percentage is irrelevant. Calculate the statistical P value and it's impossible for it to be a coincidence.
(Take a barrel of 5000 apples, 9 of which contain a deadly poison. The percentage is tiny but you wouldn't want to eat even one!)
In any case, proving that Q is an insider was a very small part of the process. The major part was to disseminate disinformation in order to screw up the plans of the deep state. The other part was to sew "crumbs" for autists to research in order to wake people up to what was happening.
Why did he/they need to change the tripcode?
8chan had an updated where tripcodes were changed.
how many drops/tweets seem coordinated (out of the 9 posted)?
The first one might be. Q says "news unlocks map". Trump talks about a clock.
Not sure on the rest.
The invading Syria part is bs, we're not invading anyone. Joe has no control over our military. If anyone is doing anything in Syria, it's not who they say it is.
Because we're being taught to have faith.
Doesnt need to. They've given us all we need, "more than we know".
Now is the time for that trust and faith he was preparing us for for 3 years.
Q, if you're still out there, you're probably perusing parts of this board and I hope you read this. I pray to God for you and the President. President Trump, we miss you! God Bless you, and God Bless America.
When Q predicted No Names death 30 days to the minute, that was the end of any doubt I ever had!
So a number of these occur at the same time of day, did Trump post on a schedule?
Not trying to disbelieve but the repeated timestamps are of concern.
or some one spying at twitter on his acount and using the fact that he had 9 tweets he was composing in the ap to fake a proof. Twiitter was involved wlth running Q
Unlikely. https://www.bitchute.com/video/LHcg3CYHLGoR/
Great post. Love it!!
But, according to Q, there is no "Qanon" (anymore)
MSM has latched on to "Qanon" in all their hit pieces.
We have been asked to stop using the name "Qanon"
Thanks for the amazing post!!
Thanks for the heads up. Like I said below, maybe I'll take down my post and fix it.
Huh? Can you share the Q post for this?
4881
https://qposts.online/?q=qanon&s=keyword
Okay. Maybe I'll take down my post and fix it...
Oh boy ... he used the dreaded term “qanon” in the proof !!! WTF !!! didn’t he get the memo ??? /s
I didn't. Sorry, I'm a newfag.
post 4881!!! You disobeyed Q!!
Ah, is there a list of all the zero deltas?
Yes, thank you. I'll fix up the graphic to reflect all 40 zero deltas.
What a decade the past year has been
Do you have the list of this somewhere?
No worries. Thank you!