Searching for the courts stuff, but found this background article from today that shows the Maxwell deposition in the Virginia Guiffree Roberts case (I think). I remember several months ago pulling those depositions from both sides and reading them. It was disgusting.
the pblm with this is that the investigators and judge etc. woulda had those docs months ago and whatever was said shoulda led to arrests and charges being filed... if there was anything to go on...
so other than some smoke in the media and some denials this is worth zero... .
We’ve seen a lot of evidence get declassified that should have led to arrests. If this is disturbing enough, this could lead to a public reaction to demand justice, or at least keep the red pills flowing.
You obviously didn’t listen. The judge clearly stated 7 days. The defendants attorney said they had the criminal trial and asked for a day at least. Prosecutors then chimed in and the judge stated a day was no problem and if she needed more just met them know citing the courts would take 24-48 hours to even do their part slowing the process.
Yeah I was disappointed in how lenient the judge was. Blocking so much info and then allowing so much time seemed like she was being pushed around in her ruling to me.
Oh absolutely. I try not to focus on dates, but if this thing hits around 3 today, I will be 100% convinced that things are falling into place nicely.
I think 3:05
Paln = Darnkess ???
This is where I am watching
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwell/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
Interesting to note that new data was added to CL's drop yesterday
FWIW this article states they will be released Friday 1/29.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/judge-orders-more-ghislaine-maxwell-files-into-the-sunlight-except-for-prurient-info-about-adults/
10 to 1 they mention Creepy Joe
FBI, huh? Wrong side
Find, Bury, Ignore ? yea, they'll get right on it.
Oh my sides.....ha ha ha!
Second Marker on the watch says 3:05 on 27
Per ItsAFreeCountry: "Jizzlaine Maxwell". I found that very amusing and appropriate.
I can't take credit for that, stole it from someone.
btw, format to tag another user: u/underradarwildcamper
We have marker 2 possibly today.
Time on the watch is 3:06 or 3:05 on the 27th. Could also be February though.
Link, please?
Searching for the courts stuff, but found this background article from today that shows the Maxwell deposition in the Virginia Guiffree Roberts case (I think). I remember several months ago pulling those depositions from both sides and reading them. It was disgusting.
https://okmagazine.com/p/jeffrey-epstein-testimony-ghislaine-maxwell-case/
They asked her what her favorite ice cream was.
redacted im sure.
iirc the judge only mentioned redacting actual minors and one other instance. under current litigation maybe? it was surprisingly lax.
Anybody heard anything yet?
The defendant (Maxwell) filed a request to reconsider the scope of the unsealing a few days ago: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1191/giuffre-v-maxwell/
Today, the plaintiff filed a request to deny Maxwell's request today: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1194/giuffre-v-maxwell/.
No response from the judge recorded yet.
An industrial shredder now that Dems are back in charge of pretty much everything.
Court docs will force Justice John Robert's to resign as prophesied.
Is he ill, or suicidal? Just to be clear
Did they get dumped? Looks like a while lot of documents uploaded on the courtlistener link that another person provided.
the pblm with this is that the investigators and judge etc. woulda had those docs months ago and whatever was said shoulda led to arrests and charges being filed... if there was anything to go on...
so other than some smoke in the media and some denials this is worth zero... .
We’ve seen a lot of evidence get declassified that should have led to arrests. If this is disturbing enough, this could lead to a public reaction to demand justice, or at least keep the red pills flowing.
Not a fact. She gave them a week, added a day, the eluded to the court taking 24-48 hours. I don’t think it will be this week
The hearing was last Tuesday, giving them 7+1 days to today. Beyond today, they would be violating the order to release.
You obviously didn’t listen. The judge clearly stated 7 days. The defendants attorney said they had the criminal trial and asked for a day at least. Prosecutors then chimed in and the judge stated a day was no problem and if she needed more just met them know citing the courts would take 24-48 hours to even do their part slowing the process.
I guess I missed that part. Love our court system.
Yeah I was disappointed in how lenient the judge was. Blocking so much info and then allowing so much time seemed like she was being pushed around in her ruling to me.
Covering for each other.
so when do we expect them then??
Well...filibuster.