Rand Paul is controlled opposition. Not only did he NOT VOTE to object to ANY STATES... he was also very anti-Trump before Trump became so powerful that he could no longer sustain a career in the republican party without sucking up to him.
Wrong. Rand Paul is a strict constitutionalist and the most "FOR the PEOPLE" person we have in politics today. He was reading a stupid script for a comedy show pretending to be a media correspondent. You're going to slap him with the "controlled op" label over this nonsense, an interview with a vapid host, while he was actively running AGAINST Trump? Before him and Trump were able to really talk to each other?
Look at all of the meetings Trump and Rand had after Trump won the presidency. Think of all the terrible things Trump said about Rand...oh there really wasn't anyhing of substance was there? I think Trump made fun of Rand's looks. And that was it. Why is that? Because Trump knew who Rand was. Rand may not have known who Trump really was at that time, but Trump knew who Rand was. A patriot. Trump and Rand are basically on the same side, here. They are FOR the people. and against the corruption in government. Rand has MORE than proven himself over the years.
That's an absolutely valid concern and I'm glad that he brought that thought up in people's minds. Was he wrong about Trump in regards to that? Yes. But he was not wrong in bringing up the topic. In the end, Rand and Trump collaborated on many things and got some very good things passed. Rand is a solid patriot.
It's completely constitutional to object to the electoral college. Being a 'strict constitutionalist' isn't an excuse for turning a blind eye to the most corrupt election in history.
Days after President Joe Biden took office and the Democrats took control of the U.S. Senate, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., would not unequivocally say Sunday that the 2020 presidential election was not stolen and called for an investigation of fraud, without providing evidence. "The debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing,** which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question," Paul said on ABC's "This Week."
While Paul was one of the many Republican politicians who repeated Trump's unfounded allegations of voter fraud, the Kentucky senator did not object to the certification of the Electoral College on Jan. 7 and has said previously that he thinks Congress should not overturn results. "Now, let me say to be clear, I voted to certify the state electors because I think it would be wrong for Congress to overturn that," he said.
Rand is principled and many people hate that about him, because they would rather someone go AGAINST what they believe is the correct interpretation of the law, in order to get a desired result for THEIR side. Rand sticks to what he believes and doesn't bend it or turn his back on it just to give his side a win. That's called integrity. He has said repeatedly that he does not believe it is the role of congress to overturn a state's electoral collage votes. He didn't just conveniently start believing that this year. That's always been his stance.
t's not over. Blaming the good people on our side and attacking them is not the way you "win." However, it is definitely the way the other side wins.
Rand has been one of the most vocal people out there about the integrity of our elections.
Rand Paul endorsed Mitt Romney in 2012 over his own father Ron Paul.
I tried to give him another chance but nope, he flipped on Trump too and put his stamp of approval on the Election Fraud.
Those two things show us that Rand Paul is a coward. I do not really believe that he has principles. I just think he is good at rationalizing his own bullshit. He’s probably being blackmailed.
He campaigned against Trump and Trump mopped the floor with him and Rand took it personal. Rand has always been pure libertarian to a fault. His reason for not objecting was that its the legislature's job.
He has always been consisting in his voting and calling out congress and their spending yearly.
Rand Paul is controlled opposition. Not only did he NOT VOTE to object to ANY STATES... he was also very anti-Trump before Trump became so powerful that he could no longer sustain a career in the republican party without sucking up to him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CAy5cR_Dds
Wrong. Rand Paul is a strict constitutionalist and the most "FOR the PEOPLE" person we have in politics today. He was reading a stupid script for a comedy show pretending to be a media correspondent. You're going to slap him with the "controlled op" label over this nonsense, an interview with a vapid host, while he was actively running AGAINST Trump? Before him and Trump were able to really talk to each other?
Look at all of the meetings Trump and Rand had after Trump won the presidency. Think of all the terrible things Trump said about Rand...oh there really wasn't anyhing of substance was there? I think Trump made fun of Rand's looks. And that was it. Why is that? Because Trump knew who Rand was. Rand may not have known who Trump really was at that time, but Trump knew who Rand was. A patriot. Trump and Rand are basically on the same side, here. They are FOR the people. and against the corruption in government. Rand has MORE than proven himself over the years.
Listen to what he said here at this point in the interview: https://youtu.be/1CAy5cR_Dds?t=204
That's an absolutely valid concern and I'm glad that he brought that thought up in people's minds. Was he wrong about Trump in regards to that? Yes. But he was not wrong in bringing up the topic. In the end, Rand and Trump collaborated on many things and got some very good things passed. Rand is a solid patriot.
It's completely constitutional to object to the electoral college. Being a 'strict constitutionalist' isn't an excuse for turning a blind eye to the most corrupt election in history.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sen-rand-paul-continues-making-false-claims-2020/story?id=75446712
Rand is principled and many people hate that about him, because they would rather someone go AGAINST what they believe is the correct interpretation of the law, in order to get a desired result for THEIR side. Rand sticks to what he believes and doesn't bend it or turn his back on it just to give his side a win. That's called integrity. He has said repeatedly that he does not believe it is the role of congress to overturn a state's electoral collage votes. He didn't just conveniently start believing that this year. That's always been his stance.
t's not over. Blaming the good people on our side and attacking them is not the way you "win." However, it is definitely the way the other side wins.
Rand has been one of the most vocal people out there about the integrity of our elections.
Rand Paul endorsed Mitt Romney in 2012 over his own father Ron Paul.
I tried to give him another chance but nope, he flipped on Trump too and put his stamp of approval on the Election Fraud.
Those two things show us that Rand Paul is a coward. I do not really believe that he has principles. I just think he is good at rationalizing his own bullshit. He’s probably being blackmailed.
It was for the people to call our side terrorists?
Fuck off with that
He campaigned against Trump and Trump mopped the floor with him and Rand took it personal. Rand has always been pure libertarian to a fault. His reason for not objecting was that its the legislature's job.
He has always been consisting in his voting and calling out congress and their spending yearly.