Anyone charging you money for access to info is lying to you.
STOP clicking his links. Stop watching his videos.
If you can prove to me otherwise that would be great, too.
Anyone charging you money for access to info is lying to you.
STOP clicking his links. Stop watching his videos.
If you can prove to me otherwise that would be great, too.
We sort of knew what the deal was with this, but there's always that glimmer of interest. I'll not watch any more of Humpty Dumpty's videos, that's for damned sure.
His lies and idiocy are actually extremely obvious! The statement he read says "... The official announcement of Joe Biden's arrest, along with 355 congressmen, 109 SENATORS -- 464 elected..." (355 + 109 = 464) This guy can't even do the simplest and most basic of "sanity checks" on his "very very good source that's working in high office", as verified to him by two different people! Apparently all of these high-level sources (along with Ward himself) are complete fucking idiots who don't even know there are ONLY 100 SENATORS TOTAL!!!
Don't take this to be support of his statement, which has absolutely no basis in fact as far as I can tell. But just to be absolutely clear, he does not say they are sitting in the current congress. These arrests could include retired senators and congressmen. This is one of those frustrating technicalities of language, because it is often permissible to call someone senator even if they are a former senator. It is one of those courtesies extended to elected representatives. It is the same reason why people were wrong to jump on Biden for saying President Trump rather than former President Trump. Either is acceptable, even though the latter is more correct. So it is at least theoretically possible that some retired senators could have been arrested after showing up for the inauguration ceremony, and be lumped in as "senators". Again, all that said, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and there is no evidence to support anything he says.
Good point.
Your and other explanations like State senators are certainly feasible, but Ward should have been smart enough to recognize the problem with saying 109 senators and then provided clarification or even a guess about how his "sources" arrived at that number. Anyway, 6pm EST has come and gone so hopefully everyone can plainly see it was bogus. I just hope people on this board can see through the hoax of fraudsters like Ward, Parks, McKay, etc. because it builds false hope and makes us look like fools for believing in such ridiculous claims.
I question everyone....actually SP has not been flamboyant about his comments...he does not ask for money...he thinks he has had sex with aliens?...I'm sure half the males on this board THINK they had sex with Marilyn Monroe.......SP called it about the nashville bomb, he offered a reason why nothing happened on Jan 20th(bomb scare), and he has offered today that perhaps something will be happening on superbowl sunday....all of these people have appeared on each others shows, patriot streetfighter is friends with AWK, and SP and Ward have had shows with Mel T. .Right on Radio has had several of these same people on his show.....so are they all in on it?...
these people have had careers before this election and will want to continue their careers.....seems to me they would do their best to remain somewhat on target.......
Patriotstreetfighter has had some outlandish 'Info" on his show which in totality is far fetched. but he is passionate and seems to know his stuff.
trust but verify....
Not that I beliece him, but can that include state level and national level senators?
I've read a msg board somewhere that had the same info as Ward....remember Ward is NOT and American and does know our system or probably how many senators we have...
The context of saying "Biden" then "congressmen" right next to "senators" indicates to me he was talking about U.S. and not state. It would have been really easy to avoid this confusion right up front by saying something like, "... at both the U.S. and State government levels" if he had actually made the connection that 109 is an impossible number without providing additional clarification.
Good point!