This was on 8kun last night. What are everyone's thoughts on looking back if this could be true?
At the time it happened I thought Q was just referring to the one post when the trip got compromised...but the anon in the screen cap and what they wrote below is a compelling argument looking back.
If true, did Q let them do this or did they have a sleeper in their ranks and we would need to comb through those 1000 posts to see what should be thrown out or it just couldn't be possible and the anon below is wrong?
For sure it wasn't 1000 posts submitted by the hacker. The reasons to reject the hypothesis are very simple:
Q has many tripcodes (team up to 10, most of them are from millitary)
having that many tripcodes it's impossible that someone would allow to publish fake posts without the warning faster than 1000 next posts
time difference between 131 and the last post the hypothesis is referring to is 9 months
It's unbelievable that 10 people (more than half from military) having multiple independent tripcodes were unable to post a warning or update/delete more than 1000 fake posts for 9 months.
I'm sure they would notice/correct, the same as they've published "typo, on the move" multiple times, almost immediately after the mistake.
All of what you say is true. My first thought is it can't be right, unless Q team knew they had a mole and let them go off for disinformation it would have to be intentional.
However, if not right what do people think Q meant by 131 is the last? Any working theories on that I might have missed the last 3 years?
For the life of me I don't see the explanation for that part of the 1835 post during the trip change and I saw it in real time on voat at the time. I didn't remember thinking anything funny at the time with the 131 mention. Seeing it again last night in this context was thought provoking for the anons theory at any rate.
It meant that post 131 in the OTHER BOARD was the last. It's not rocket science. This was in the 8chan days when Q was given two boards to post on. He had his own private board where he posted a few hundred times. If you look at any Q sites that archive posts such as qagg, you can see direct links for each post. Q post 1834 shows direct link 131. Q post 1835 is the one you're referencing, and it has direct link 132. Because it's the 132nd post Q made in the OTHER board. Mystery solved. Now stop clogging up the board with this waste of time.
I mean... you literally suggested that people here comb through over 1500 posts to try and find out what's true and what's not true. I consider that a massive waste of time.
No I didn't. I said if people thought it had merit maybe we could go dig again.
1 all posts are worth re-looking at because future proves past so it's never a waste of time.
2 I didn't think it all too likely a theory as my last line states "is the anon just wrong?" I was questioning it and wondered what others thought.
But I didn't understand the board chan changes another anon told me about when I reposted with a better title. I was stuck on what Q said about post 131 being the last. As I am a bit chan illiterate I didn't realize q was posting to multi boards at the same time back at post 131.
Post 131 on the Qpatriots board on 8chan was the 1834th post he's ever made in general, because he had 1700+ posts in other places like the 4chan site and the other board on 8chan at the time. For instance, he's made roughly around 1300 posts on 8kun, but that doesn't mean his last post on 8kun isn't his 4953rd post. You have to include all of them.
This is why I don't like this site. Too many stupid people who don't do their research and instead spread nonsensical misinformation. When Q wrote "no. 131 last" that was in reference to the post number on the private qresearch board. This was back in the 8chan days before the site was shut down. There was a separate board that only Q could respond to and no one else. Q would leave drops there every now and then, 131 at the time. You can even see this for yourself if you go on the qagg.news website. If you look at Q post 1846 it tells you "Direct Link: 2556723" the posts with the long numbers are the public posts that everyone can respond to. If you look at Q post 1835 which is the post you're referencing, it tells you "Direct Link: 132" because Q wrote that in the board that only he writes in. It's different now on 8kun. Q used to write posts in two different boards on 8chan.
Q is not on 8kun Q went for good last Nov 02
I know that an anon posted a theory on q post 1835.
This was on 8kun last night. What are everyone's thoughts on looking back if this could be true?
At the time it happened I thought Q was just referring to the one post when the trip got compromised...but the anon in the screen cap and what they wrote below is a compelling argument looking back.
If true, did Q let them do this or did they have a sleeper in their ranks and we would need to comb through those 1000 posts to see what should be thrown out or it just couldn't be possible and the anon below is wrong?
https://qposts.online/post/131 https://qposts.online/post/1834
https://qposts.online/post/132 https://qposts.online/post/1833
"There's almost 5000(*) posts. 1835 says some were compd.
It just so happens, all the stuff likezero risk of impeachmentandtrust sessionsand all the wrong stuff is in the posts Q said were compd.
That leaves over 3000 non-compd posts which don't have the wrong stuff
(*) the number is specific."
I didnt say Q posted that last night...I said an anon did talking about a theory from qpost 1835.
Ok, ok, fine.
But hopefully lesson learned that “Good Titles Matter”? ?
Cheers, fren.
If that was true Q would probably delete or update the affected posts with a label.
Just for the history books: I don't think Q would leave it like that.
Is someone ok 8kun trying to make future Q proofs less trustworthy?
That's possible. But then why did Q say 131 was the last? What did that mean?
The answer is simple: it was something else :)
For sure it wasn't 1000 posts submitted by the hacker. The reasons to reject the hypothesis are very simple:
Q has many tripcodes (team up to 10, most of them are from millitary)
having that many tripcodes it's impossible that someone would allow to publish fake posts without the warning faster than 1000 next posts
time difference between 131 and the last post the hypothesis is referring to is 9 months
It's unbelievable that 10 people (more than half from military) having multiple independent tripcodes were unable to post a warning or update/delete more than 1000 fake posts for 9 months.
I'm sure they would notice/correct, the same as they've published "typo, on the move" multiple times, almost immediately after the mistake.
All of what you say is true. My first thought is it can't be right, unless Q team knew they had a mole and let them go off for disinformation it would have to be intentional.
However, if not right what do people think Q meant by 131 is the last? Any working theories on that I might have missed the last 3 years?
For the life of me I don't see the explanation for that part of the 1835 post during the trip change and I saw it in real time on voat at the time. I didn't remember thinking anything funny at the time with the 131 mention. Seeing it again last night in this context was thought provoking for the anons theory at any rate.
It meant that post 131 in the OTHER BOARD was the last. It's not rocket science. This was in the 8chan days when Q was given two boards to post on. He had his own private board where he posted a few hundred times. If you look at any Q sites that archive posts such as qagg, you can see direct links for each post. Q post 1834 shows direct link 131. Q post 1835 is the one you're referencing, and it has direct link 132. Because it's the 132nd post Q made in the OTHER board. Mystery solved. Now stop clogging up the board with this waste of time.
I hardly think it's a waste of time. If I missed it, and I've followed since 2017 then others missed that connection. What you say made sense.
I mean... you literally suggested that people here comb through over 1500 posts to try and find out what's true and what's not true. I consider that a massive waste of time.
No I didn't. I said if people thought it had merit maybe we could go dig again.
1 all posts are worth re-looking at because future proves past so it's never a waste of time.
2 I didn't think it all too likely a theory as my last line states "is the anon just wrong?" I was questioning it and wondered what others thought.
But I didn't understand the board chan changes another anon told me about when I reposted with a better title. I was stuck on what Q said about post 131 being the last. As I am a bit chan illiterate I didn't realize q was posting to multi boards at the same time back at post 131.
Q post =/= Board post.
Post 131 on the Qpatriots board on 8chan was the 1834th post he's ever made in general, because he had 1700+ posts in other places like the 4chan site and the other board on 8chan at the time. For instance, he's made roughly around 1300 posts on 8kun, but that doesn't mean his last post on 8kun isn't his 4953rd post. You have to include all of them.
I guess my title sucks for those that didn't read my full comment or drop 1835.
For that I apologize. It is an anon theory.
Those of you down voting, I did not say Q posted this. Please read qpost 1835.
An anon posted this on 8kun last night as a theory. I'd to discuss the validity of the anons theory. I know Q isn't posting right now.
You worded it that way on purpose to draw attention right? You are getting the attention you deserve for a click bait title....
No not on purpose. Gonna delete and repost with a better title. I wanted to discuss anons theory.
http://www.prettysharp.be/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/gif-thumbs-down-honey-boo-boo.gif
Wrong.
This is why I don't like this site. Too many stupid people who don't do their research and instead spread nonsensical misinformation. When Q wrote "no. 131 last" that was in reference to the post number on the private qresearch board. This was back in the 8chan days before the site was shut down. There was a separate board that only Q could respond to and no one else. Q would leave drops there every now and then, 131 at the time. You can even see this for yourself if you go on the qagg.news website. If you look at Q post 1846 it tells you "Direct Link: 2556723" the posts with the long numbers are the public posts that everyone can respond to. If you look at Q post 1835 which is the post you're referencing, it tells you "Direct Link: 132" because Q wrote that in the board that only he writes in. It's different now on 8kun. Q used to write posts in two different boards on 8chan.
Lmao you must be a child to feel the need to downvote me, OP. I called you out on your lazy "theory" ... Own up to it.
Correct, go and read drop 135 then 1835 and there's the answer.
I thought it was interesting too and worth a look. Thank you for reading my post and understanding I didn't say Q posted this. )
There are so many low-IQ on here fren. Thanks for the share!
The theory is Q posted 1-131, got compromised then fixed the trip code at 1835. So in the theory 1835 to the last post In November is real Q again.
I'm not sure it holds up but that's why I wanted to discuss it.
Theory as far as I know. It's why I wanted to discuss.