Of course it contains nanoparticles. They are PEG coated lipid containers that hold the mRNA inside. By itself there is nothing wrong with that. LOTS of our best cancer medicines work like that. In fact, that is where this technology started.
The problem is not that it contains nanoparticles, but that it is being used as a "vaccine" (its an immunotherapy) for a pandemic and is completely untested technology in that sphere.
Well, that's one of the problems, there are others. The point is, its untested in this capacity.
Not to jump on the vaccine train here because these vaccines are loathsome but let's not freak out about "nanoparticles" because I'm not sure people realize how small particles ACTUALLY get.
If they had said nanomachines then I'd be more interested.
As Pfizer site states its sort of an "operating system". Kid you not. And I'm a long time IT.
Came across an interesting news piece earlier today, though need to back track and find it again: China refuses entry to those injected with Moderna and Pfizer shots. I refuse to call them "vaccine" since they do not fit any medical definition of such. Though not sure just how China determines if someone had the injections ot not. So many new questions...
No spekee de frenchee
The important point is simply that the vaccine is said to contain nanoparticles.
Of course it contains nanoparticles. They are PEG coated lipid containers that hold the mRNA inside. By itself there is nothing wrong with that. LOTS of our best cancer medicines work like that. In fact, that is where this technology started.
The problem is not that it contains nanoparticles, but that it is being used as a "vaccine" (its an immunotherapy) for a pandemic and is completely untested technology in that sphere.
Well, that's one of the problems, there are others. The point is, its untested in this capacity.
I like to know who is the person making this assertion, what is their background and on what basis are they making that assertion.
Not to jump on the vaccine train here because these vaccines are loathsome but let's not freak out about "nanoparticles" because I'm not sure people realize how small particles ACTUALLY get.
If they had said nanomachines then I'd be more interested.
The issue with this stuff isn't that it has nanoparticles, even.
It's that it's not a vaccine and yet it's being called a vaccine.
What exactly do they contain?
As Pfizer site states its sort of an "operating system". Kid you not. And I'm a long time IT.
Came across an interesting news piece earlier today, though need to back track and find it again: China refuses entry to those injected with Moderna and Pfizer shots. I refuse to call them "vaccine" since they do not fit any medical definition of such. Though not sure just how China determines if someone had the injections ot not. So many new questions...
please post link if you can find. I can't find using Startpage.
Jan 25 2021