Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

142
supreme-court-will-decide-whether-police-can-enter-a-home-to-seize-guns-without-a-warrant - Forbes (www.forbes.com)
posted 5 years ago by seernewday 5 years ago by seernewday +142 / -0
27 comments share
27 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (27)
sorted by:
▲ 38 ▼
– Infinitytheholyone 38 points 5 years ago +38 / -0

Very simple answer... no... they cannot...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– St0rm_Shad0w 18 points 5 years ago +18 / -0

They will though.

They control everything -- WH, Senate, Courts. There's only two ways to stop this: the military steps up and puts and end to the corruption OR it's on to Plan B.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Infinitytheholyone 12 points 5 years ago +12 / -0

If the SCOTUS even considers this... there's going to be an uproar... and dissenters to an this beginning ruled unconstitutional need impeachment immediately... there will be a petition for it(as if that would mean anything at that point)... but once that doesn't work it's either MIL or the contingency plan...

Note: I'm not for the last option but the constitution lays it out as it a necessity for when all other avenues available have been afforded an attempt with no avail...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– GreatFunana 11 points 5 years ago +11 / -0

Any search in this country requires a warrant, period. The very consideration of this is literal insanity.

Behind every blade of a grass in this country is a gun. Please, please come and try to take them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– OkieBowhunter 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Wait, why are the siezing guns? I thought the 2nd Amendment protected them?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– St0rm_Shad0w 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

The only real thing preventing the DS from doing every Draconian thing they can think of is the 2nd Am. and our "Right to bear arms." They know we know that we have a right and duty to protect ourselves from tyranny.

These numerous FF events with shootings over the years have been a concerted effort to write a narrative, being that guns are "No good" and "Do nothing but kill people."

Classic Hegelian Dialectic > Problem > Reaction > Solution

Problem = The Majority of Patriots have guns and ammo

Reaction = Make guns "bad"

Solution = Take said gun from the Patriots

This is by far one of the most obvious plays that a corrupt and illegitimate Pedo Joe Admin would make. Now that the DS cabal control everything the guns WILL be taken.

WHO will stop them? WHO will force them to abide the Constitution when they haven't thus far?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– farpointpatriot 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Anon ... You nailed it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– farpointpatriot 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

This needs to be it's own post. For real.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– colinsackorpick 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

^^^^^ Exactly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– RIPIsaacKappy 12 points 5 years ago +12 / -0

"Supreme Court to decide whether hundreds of cops will be shot to death by people defending their homes and constitutional rights."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– Passthatwrench 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0

You can buy a weapon but law enforcement can follow you home from the gun shop and take it from you when you get there. AND, while they are there, have probable cause to search your house and use anything in your possession as evidence against you. All for our safety.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– EJay_Scott 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

Archived version:

https://archive.is/DU7rO

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– jujufumpkins 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

I'll take things that are unconstitutional for 1000 Alex.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– 2day 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

Article should be labeled - "Is there really any need to follow the first 10 amendments to the US Constitution any longer"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Pond_Watcher 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

.. Only if they are OK with getting shot.

Repugnant to the Constitution - easy decision.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ItsAFreeCountry 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Two constitutional wrongs don’t make a right.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– crossin_rubies 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Lol it doesn't matter who decides what. A court can tell them they can enter a home for whatever reason they want.

An entirely separate consideration will be if any of them ever leave that home still breathing.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

this SHOULD be the easiest case they’ve ever had

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– farpointpatriot 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Well Fuck me running.

The First, Second, AND NOW FOURTH Amendments are all under assault.

Next come the 5th.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SuckaFree 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

We wouldn't even be having this discussion if we had a justice oriented court system.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Narflethegarthok 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Like anyone need scotus to chime in in this. Lol.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Pond_Watcher 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Narrow interpretation of the 'community caretaking exception' and a bad lower court decision.

Click-bait headline by Forbes...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Ray_ciss 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

"The Constitution has either provided for a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."

-Lysander Spooner

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– crossin_rubies 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

At some point they will have to "circle back" to the 3rd and come up with an entirely improbable and outrageous excuse to force us to board soldiers. Just to complete the entire Bill of Rights shitstorm and finalize the demoralizing of the people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FireTriangle 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Since the sc is not in my living room, I conclude it really does not matter what they say....matters if me and my family decide they can enter MY home without a warrant. I know it is a death sentence, but what comes after the little seizure exercise?.....is they don't decide to kill you right there.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy