Trumps lawyers WANTED to go to trial...
?? Theory ??
They didn’t even TRY to win their argument yesterday. I think they WANT to show their evidence. Do they have evidence that the Dems and Rinos PLANNED the attack on the capital and PLANNED to impeach Trump? Guess we ll find out
Consider that the lawyers Trump decided to go with are former federal prosecutors, not Constitutional law experts, not defense attorneys, prosecutors.
Prosecutors exist to show evidence. You can't convict someone without showing evidence. Defense attorneys are the ones that like quick summary judgments early on in the trial.
So yeah, I agree. It is pretty obvious Trump wants this trial to go forward. I really want to see where he plans on taking this.
Good call
This is definitely a trap for the Dems
And the Republicans. Trap them all. Not too many good actors.
The Dems are so fucking dim witted they can't even see who's running the show, lol.
Yep Senator Leahy, a Democrat from Vermont. He has already shown bias he would vote to impeach if he was not going to judge. He has "promised" to be impartial as a judge though.
While they may have set a new precedent for impeaching a president not currently in office, they have also set a new precedent no one else has talked about yet that impeachment hearings can be conducted with no supreme court.
Art 1 Sec 3
American law does not allow a person to be both a judge presiding over a trial and also a juror in the same trial.
What if this man, :Russell-Jay: Gould is legitimate? Wouldn’t he be the lead Justice? I know this gentlemen, may come off as absolutely insane, and can be very hard to digest, nonetheless be considered believable.
However, I do believe that admiralty law, the Organic and Inorganic act(s), Bretton Woods Act, Logan Act, Federal Reserve Act, Social Security, Maternity act(s), etc, ALL these acts could potentially play into the framework that built this house that we currently reside in.
https://lastflagstanding.com/videos/
In his newest video regarding Twilight Zone, about 6:50 in : Russell –Jay: Gould, states Biden Admin sent him confirmation that Biden was not administered the oath, but rather that it (the inauguration) issued a Proclamation. I am curious about the validity, yet my instinct says trust this man.
I once followed the sovereign movement, that ultimately tied all laws into Admiralty/Maritime law, led by Winston Shrout, Brandon Alexander Adams, Gordon Hall, etc. They were correct about the US Flag (US Code, Title 4) that we see at the Whitehouse, courtrooms and whatnot. The fringe indicates a captured (wartime flag) with its Gold Fringe. I was too afraid to roll the dice on capturing my strawman through their process so I left all efforts on this front, on the back burner. There website used to exist as Creditorsincommerce.com
It turns out they went to jail, yet I still always believed they were on to something, Maybe : R-J: G is also on to something. We don't know the plan, yet somehow this (sovereignty) all seems plausible and relevant. You decide.... https://shazereverquar.wordpress.com/2015/07/01/creditors-in-commerce-receive-stiff-prison-sentences/
Where did you find his latest video?
https://lastflagstanding.com/videos/
The one about : R-J: G ? Click link, click videos, Click video titled "Twilight Zone..."
Thanks to fjolsvith in another thread from today (We are going to show you a new world), for providing a Sovereign Ideology 101 doc
http://annavonreitz.com/briefreportenglish.pdf
In other words, ”I’m not locked in here with you... You’re locked in here with me.”
Well, in a way, maybe he is. Maybe that wasn’t a mistake.