Rush Limbaugh, host: College Park, Maryland. Larry hello. Welcome to the EIB Network,
Larry (Caller, College Park, Maryland) : Hi, hello, Rush Limbaugh.
Limbaugh: Hi.
Larry: I'll tell you, with all due respect, I couldn't disagree with you more, sir, and...
Limbaugh : Just in general ?
Larry. Well, in most things. There's a few things we might agree on, but really, you know, you always say you're in pursuit of the truth, but sometimes I don't think you'd know it if you tripped over it. And you've concentrated on a lot of things, like Aldrich and Filegate, and Hillary's polls, and frankly, she's not even running for president, and you miss the point
Limbaugh: But she is. Well, but she is.
Larry: Well, she's not on the ballot in my state.
Limbaugh: But- well, but she is- she's- she's as much a vote-getter as he is. She positions herself that way . I mean, she- she- yeah, come on admit that for crying out loud. She- they said, 'Vote for one, you get us both', the blue plate special.
Larry: Well, she said that, but in reality, but she's not really running, and they can shut her off if they need to, and put her back in the back room, and bring her out if they need her after he's re-elected, because he will probably be re-elected.
Limbaugh: It's exactly what happens.
Larry : That's correct, sir, and I'll tell you where you miss the mark, and you miss it consistently, you know, you talk about Livingstone and Filegate and so on, and that's not really the issue with Mr. Livingstone. I think you said Filegate might have legs because it's current, and I think you're wrong, again. There are other things that are current, that- that don't have legs. Mr. Livingstone was very much the central figure in the death of Vincent Foster, and you yourself said, and I quote, 'Find out why Vince Foster's dead, and you'll unlock the key to all of these things.'
Limbaugh: Yeah.
Larry: But, you know, sir, you never, ever discuss all of the facts of the Foster case. You ignore them, you duck them, and you never address the issue. If that's such a key issue, if that's so important as you said. You said that's the whole key, yet you never talk about it. You very seldom bring up the topic. For example, Livingstone- Livingstone was in the morgue, you know,
Limbaugh: Well, no, no, I am not going to speculate about it 'cause I don't know.
Larry: Well, I'm not speculating, because I've read the documents, and I went out to the morgue, and I interviewed the staff out there at Fairfax morgue, and I know that Craig Livingstone was there before the Park Police came and picked up the keys, and it was the story in the New York Post yesterday--John Crudel covered it, and- and it is a fact, that the Park Police came after, and that there were no car keys found on Mr. Foster at the park. Let me ask you a question. How did Foster get to the park, when his car was there, and there were no car keys? Answer me that one.
Limbaugh. I have no idea.
Larry: Well, do you think he drove with no keys? Can you speculate on that?
Limbaugh: What is- why- why don't you- I got a minute, here. What is the point you're making, that he com- that he did not commit suicide? Larry: The point- well, I don,t know if he committed suicide or not, but I know we haven't been told the truth, and you always say you're in relentless pursuit of the truth, but not on the this issue you're not. You ducked this issue. You do not pursue the truth here. That's a fact. and we've not been told the truth, and that's the fact, too. You can read the Fiske report and see that it's full of errors. Have you read the Fiske report?
Limbaugh: I- yeah- well, no, but I.
Larry: Well then, you're not in pursuit of the truth.
Limbaugh: ..but, I-, I- so, what we have here, you are---
Larry: You're not informed.
Limbaugh; ...you are not, as- as Mr. Snerdley (sp) thought, a Clinton supporter.
Larry: Well, I think Clinton's going to be re-elected.
Limbaugh: No, no, no. Did you tell him you were a Clinton supporter..
Larry Yes. I, yeah, I... (Limbaugh dumped his telephonic tormentor.)
Limbaugh: Well, so you lied, Larry. So, when you tell one lie, all of what you say is worthless. That's the mantra, today. So sir, you're not going to be rewarded by saying- you don't have to lie to get on this program. If you are in the pursuit of Vince Foster being murdered, get your own show, and you go out and pursue it as best you- as best you can, but don't lie to get on this program, to accuse me of malfeasance, or some-, some sort of incompetence, as host.
With R. Limbaugh in the background, I choked on my hot dog when a
caller named Larry got by the screen by claiming to be a Clinton
supporter.
After talking about Clinton for a second he took RL on as a fraud for
claiming to always be looking for the truth. "What about the truth
about Vince Foster", he said. "You never want to talk about that."
From high atop his mountain of excellence, overlooking the turnpike of
truth, he hung up on the guy. Rush claimed one neednšt lie to get on his
program. Do you really believe he would have gotten through with his
topic had he been straightforward? Personally, I doubt it.
Regards, DL
Clearly Larry did have to lie to get on the program, which would
make Rush himself a liar, and: "when you tell one lie, all of what you say
is worthless".
Limbaugh covers up the truth about Vincent Foster not because he is afraid
of losing market share.
He covers up the truth because that is in his job description. Like any
good government propagandists he DIVIDES the people (in his case between
left and right) and then DISTRACTS attention from the truth by pointing to
Filegate, Watergate, Chinagate, Wiley etc. all of the "approved" scandals
de jour.
Limbaugh is part of the establishment media. Limbaugh is the official
"critic". Only government sponsored "critics" are allowed to criticize
the government.
THAT is Limbaugh's job and that is why he is silent on Foster.
I was a diehard Rush fan for many many years. But once my eyes were opened and I learned about the actual eating and drinking of babies by these psychopaths I thought to myself....if some little inconsequential person like me can easily find out about this stuff...how does someone like Rush, Hannity, etc. not know about it? If they don’t then they’re fake and ignorant and if they do then why aren’t they using their platform to scream it from the hills? That’s when I stopped listening to all of them.
I think Rush was very legit at the beginning. Probably accepted the rules of the game in the middle ie: Bush era, and then at the end realized being legit was the way to go.
Basically the phases we all go through. Optimistic, doomer but make the best of it, truther and acceptance that we can make a difference.
Honestly I think Trump getting elected changed how he saw things.
It's enough we have vile, despicable assholes on the left cheering on his death. Is it really necessary to post something like this less than a week after his death? This is in very bad taste.
He probably did have his parameters set but the people he woke up were free to break beyond those barriers. Like AJ may well be controlled op but he woke up a ton of people who have been free to leave him in the dust. If people continue to be confined by the Overton Window it's probably because they're too scared to break free. We tend to stay where we feel the safest.
>> I always wondered how Rush could go so far and absolutely no farther
He did that constantly, as it was his main job. The way he bowed down to slime like the Bush family and Rubio. He refused to single the Bushes out and get specific about their horrible record. He slyly targeted in a vague way NeverTrumpers, and he was also allowed to target some of the stupider Neocons, but so what? He was told how far he could go.
I'll say again: It was his job to run to the front of the 'conservative' pack and make sure the Overton Window did not get smashed. He did that by having permission to appear to be 'cutting edge conservative' without going too far. He was ideal for that job, as he was extremely smart, subtle, and very talented. His initial talent had to be organic, so the 'ticket' did come later for his expansion, plus extras.
Do you know what the Mitrokhin Archive is?
Of course not. It was way before the time of weaned-on-mobile-device slobs who can't be bothered with capitalization or other basic grammar.
I am demonstrating that I knew what an agent of influence was before you were born. If you had bothered to mouse-over-select "Mitrokhin Archive" and right-click pop it into a search-engine, it could have clued you in.
Anybody who listened to Rush knows he spoke from the heart, not from a Deep State script.
Get out of here with that BS!
That time when Rush Limbaugh helped the Cabal conceal a murder:
TRANSCRIPT DATE:July 2, 1996 TIME:12: 00-3: 00 PM EDT STATION:WMAL-AM(ABC) LOCATION:Washington PROGRAM:The Rush Limbaugh Show (Syndicated)
Rush Limbaugh, host: College Park, Maryland. Larry hello. Welcome to the EIB Network,
Larry (Caller, College Park, Maryland) : Hi, hello, Rush Limbaugh.
Limbaugh: Hi.
Larry: I'll tell you, with all due respect, I couldn't disagree with you more, sir, and...
Limbaugh : Just in general ?
Larry. Well, in most things. There's a few things we might agree on, but really, you know, you always say you're in pursuit of the truth, but sometimes I don't think you'd know it if you tripped over it. And you've concentrated on a lot of things, like Aldrich and Filegate, and Hillary's polls, and frankly, she's not even running for president, and you miss the point
Limbaugh: But she is. Well, but she is.
Larry: Well, she's not on the ballot in my state.
Limbaugh: But- well, but she is- she's- she's as much a vote-getter as he is. She positions herself that way . I mean, she- she- yeah, come on admit that for crying out loud. She- they said, 'Vote for one, you get us both', the blue plate special.
Larry: Well, she said that, but in reality, but she's not really running, and they can shut her off if they need to, and put her back in the back room, and bring her out if they need her after he's re-elected, because he will probably be re-elected.
Limbaugh: It's exactly what happens.
Larry : That's correct, sir, and I'll tell you where you miss the mark, and you miss it consistently, you know, you talk about Livingstone and Filegate and so on, and that's not really the issue with Mr. Livingstone. I think you said Filegate might have legs because it's current, and I think you're wrong, again. There are other things that are current, that- that don't have legs. Mr. Livingstone was very much the central figure in the death of Vincent Foster, and you yourself said, and I quote, 'Find out why Vince Foster's dead, and you'll unlock the key to all of these things.'
Limbaugh: Yeah.
Larry: But, you know, sir, you never, ever discuss all of the facts of the Foster case. You ignore them, you duck them, and you never address the issue. If that's such a key issue, if that's so important as you said. You said that's the whole key, yet you never talk about it. You very seldom bring up the topic. For example, Livingstone- Livingstone was in the morgue, you know,
Limbaugh: Well, no, no, I am not going to speculate about it 'cause I don't know.
Larry: Well, I'm not speculating, because I've read the documents, and I went out to the morgue, and I interviewed the staff out there at Fairfax morgue, and I know that Craig Livingstone was there before the Park Police came and picked up the keys, and it was the story in the New York Post yesterday--John Crudel covered it, and- and it is a fact, that the Park Police came after, and that there were no car keys found on Mr. Foster at the park. Let me ask you a question. How did Foster get to the park, when his car was there, and there were no car keys? Answer me that one.
Limbaugh. I have no idea.
Larry: Well, do you think he drove with no keys? Can you speculate on that?
Limbaugh: What is- why- why don't you- I got a minute, here. What is the point you're making, that he com- that he did not commit suicide? Larry: The point- well, I don,t know if he committed suicide or not, but I know we haven't been told the truth, and you always say you're in relentless pursuit of the truth, but not on the this issue you're not. You ducked this issue. You do not pursue the truth here. That's a fact. and we've not been told the truth, and that's the fact, too. You can read the Fiske report and see that it's full of errors. Have you read the Fiske report?
Limbaugh: I- yeah- well, no, but I.
Larry: Well then, you're not in pursuit of the truth.
Limbaugh: ..but, I-, I- so, what we have here, you are---
Larry: You're not informed.
Limbaugh; ...you are not, as- as Mr. Snerdley (sp) thought, a Clinton supporter.
Larry: Well, I think Clinton's going to be re-elected.
Limbaugh: No, no, no. Did you tell him you were a Clinton supporter..
Larry Yes. I, yeah, I... (Limbaugh dumped his telephonic tormentor.)
Limbaugh: Well, so you lied, Larry. So, when you tell one lie, all of what you say is worthless. That's the mantra, today. So sir, you're not going to be rewarded by saying- you don't have to lie to get on this program. If you are in the pursuit of Vince Foster being murdered, get your own show, and you go out and pursue it as best you- as best you can, but don't lie to get on this program, to accuse me of malfeasance, or some-, some sort of incompetence, as host.
Clearly Larry did have to lie to get on the program, which would make Rush himself a liar, and: "when you tell one lie, all of what you say is worthless".
Limbaugh covers up the truth about Vincent Foster not because he is afraid of losing market share.
He covers up the truth because that is in his job description. Like any good government propagandists he DIVIDES the people (in his case between left and right) and then DISTRACTS attention from the truth by pointing to Filegate, Watergate, Chinagate, Wiley etc. all of the "approved" scandals de jour.
Limbaugh is part of the establishment media. Limbaugh is the official "critic". Only government sponsored "critics" are allowed to criticize the government.
THAT is Limbaugh's job and that is why he is silent on Foster.
Bullshit. Based on what? He was fooled right along with us, by the same people, as far as I can tell.
He shilled the Starr Report. He wasn't fooled. -- He took the ticket.
vox day, LMFAO@U! all day long.
I was a diehard Rush fan for many many years. But once my eyes were opened and I learned about the actual eating and drinking of babies by these psychopaths I thought to myself....if some little inconsequential person like me can easily find out about this stuff...how does someone like Rush, Hannity, etc. not know about it? If they don’t then they’re fake and ignorant and if they do then why aren’t they using their platform to scream it from the hills? That’s when I stopped listening to all of them.
I think Rush was very legit at the beginning. Probably accepted the rules of the game in the middle ie: Bush era, and then at the end realized being legit was the way to go.
Basically the phases we all go through. Optimistic, doomer but make the best of it, truther and acceptance that we can make a difference.
Honestly I think Trump getting elected changed how he saw things.
This article on voxday is as bogus as the election...... If you believe it..... You didn’t know Rush.
It's enough we have vile, despicable assholes on the left cheering on his death. Is it really necessary to post something like this less than a week after his death? This is in very bad taste.
Of course, but trolls don't get caught up in things like "taste".
Or "truth".
Or any shit like that.
You're right, I know you're right. Amazing the sheer number of downvotes on this post page.
He probably did have his parameters set but the people he woke up were free to break beyond those barriers. Like AJ may well be controlled op but he woke up a ton of people who have been free to leave him in the dust. If people continue to be confined by the Overton Window it's probably because they're too scared to break free. We tend to stay where we feel the safest.
He did that constantly, as it was his main job. The way he bowed down to slime like the Bush family and Rubio. He refused to single the Bushes out and get specific about their horrible record. He slyly targeted in a vague way NeverTrumpers, and he was also allowed to target some of the stupider Neocons, but so what? He was told how far he could go.
I'll say again: It was his job to run to the front of the 'conservative' pack and make sure the Overton Window did not get smashed. He did that by having permission to appear to be 'cutting edge conservative' without going too far. He was ideal for that job, as he was extremely smart, subtle, and very talented. His initial talent had to be organic, so the 'ticket' did come later for his expansion, plus extras.
ahhh....
the agents of influence thing rears its ugly face yet again. which sort of agent are you?
You first, glowboy.
project much? do you even know what an agent of influence is?
Do you know what the Mitrokhin Archive is? Of course not. It was way before the time of weaned-on-mobile-device slobs who can't be bothered with capitalization or other basic grammar.
what does what this kgb defector have to do with what I am asking you? nothing, it is deflection. answer the question.
I am demonstrating that I knew what an agent of influence was before you were born. If you had bothered to mouse-over-select "Mitrokhin Archive" and right-click pop it into a search-engine, it could have clued you in.
than what sort of agent of influence are you? you seem to know so much about me. tell me about you.
I can't imagine why he would get that idea.