Hello All,
I have a liberal friend who loves folks like Gore and he is always proposing ideas that he thinks I will finally support. He thinks wealthy people should share their wealth and that they are greedy. He recently asked me if I liked the excess wealth tax being offered by Warren aka Pocahontas. This is my response. I know this still needs some work so I request your comments. Here it is:
WOW, did the wealthy demand you simply send them money? Did they propose cutting off a vital service if you failed to pay? What happened that they should be taxed in this special manner?
Phase One - Did the Billionaire offer you a product which at the moment of purchase the money in your hand was worth less than the dodad in the hand of the store clerk. In other words his dodad was more valuable than your cash. You gladly switched with the clerk. End of story.
Phase Two - The dodad you now own, proved to be worth more than the cash and is now enabling you to eat better, make more money and/or work fewer hours. You were happy with the dodad. It turned out millions of people had the same reaction. They worked less, made more money, expended less energy, watched more mindless TV and grew fat. End of story.
Phase Three - The guy who made the dodad grew wealthy. He took a bride 20 years younger, the college where he dropped out now awarded him a honorary doctorate, Time magazine made him man of the year, he ponders a run for the presidency, he demurs, and he listens to a buffoon politician and supports a crackpot science concept. The guy who bought his dodad, who grew fat sitting on the couch says, "Yeah! What a great guy!" End of story.
Phase Four - The fat guy on the couch begins to think, dang that guy has a lot of money, forgetting the benefits he gained from that dodad he purchased years ago. The fat guy on the couch begins to think that guy has too much money. The fat guy on the couch can not decide who has too much or too little money. A mooching politician, a friend of the buffoon politician supporting the phoney science, begins to observe a group of people who are very envious of the guy who made a lot of money making a certain dodad that made life better for millions of people and who are now fat couch sitters. End of story.
Phase Five - The mooching politician has a big idea. Let us tap into the resentment toward the billionaire dodad maker and propose an excess wealth tax. A tax that no one can objectively determine because no one knows how much wealth is excessive. Ah ha, we will do it by consensus just like the buffoon politician did with his science proposal. So Madame Moocher raised some trial balloons. The fat guy on the couch cheered, spilling his popcorn with the fat free imitation butter. Madame Moocher proposed how to spend the tax revenue from excessive wealth: gender issues in Pakistan, classical orchestra in Scranton, beds for folks on the southern border, and the list ends at 308 pages. The fat guy on the couch was active in the process of feeling which issues were worthy. End of story,
Phase Six - There were a few folks who knew the wealth tax for what it truly was - Theft. They dug out their Bibles, the ones they had saved from confiscation. They turned to an ancient story that appears in the early chapters of the Holy Book. The Holy Book is not used often these days, most folks sitting on couches think governments can determine what is right via the process of consensus. The Holy Book enumerated a concept known as the Ten Commandments which originally became the basis for most laws, in most countries. Those that know the Ten Commandments told the moochers, the buffoons and the couch sitters that their proposals violated four of the ten commandments:
- You shall not have strange gods before me - idol worship;
- You shall not steal - taking money from one person to give to another;
- You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor - telling others bits of information known not to be true; and
- You shall not covet your neighbor's goods - being jealous of those who work hard to honestly gain material things to be used for their enjoyment. End of story.
I'd respond simply with: "No, because who determines wealth?"
From this point on, respond with simple questions, which force him to come up with answers. Let him lead himself to his own awakening.
I like the effort the OP put into his/her response. However, this person's comment is probably a good choice. Feed the person some crumbs which they can use to educate themselves.
To be honest, I'm totally shocked at anyone who doesn't figure out Pocahontas is a phony in less than 10 seconds. It's so obvious. How dumb are these people?
Nice....anyone here on GA will follow your line of reasoning. However, liberalism being a mental disorder, I don't expect it would sway your acquaintance very much, as the power of critical thinking is mostly absent in those folks.
I feel like this tax is aimed at the GME buyers who, once they have diamond hands, will sell and be filthy rich overnight. Some already sold and got nice sums. But, they are Average Joes, not Wall Street icons, and therefore their "fair share" of tax must be paid because now they have an excess of income. It's a way to squeeze Average Joe back out of the stonk game. Can't be having "Potato_Up_My_Ass" be sullying the elite's playground. It's like Happy Gilmore showing up at the golf course and attracting all the deplorables to come there too.
I didn't look at the proposed bill. It may have nothing to do with the newfound wealth of these Average Joes, that was just the first thing that popped into my head. It's early, I'm still working on my covfefe.
Your response is keky, I like it. Pocahontas just wants her greedy fingers in everybody else's pies. It is always about the money. It truly is the root of all evil.
"doodad doo·dad | \ ˈdü-ˌdad
1 : an ornamental attachment or decoration 2 : an often small article whose common name is unknown or forgotten : GADGET"
One small change and you're golden...
Pocahontas wants to get her grubby little hands on someone’s money!
If we were in a truly free market economy with sound money created by the government without interest, we might have a fair system whereby anyone that got wealthy had to actually DO something of tremendous significance. What we do have is a system that creates wealth for the least worthy. I see little point in debating the merits of any potential new features of a corrupt system. It needs to be returned to its original layout, prior to having been hijacked by the people that are now proposing "tweaks" to appease the peasants.