You were the first one I trusted when I got here...something about you spoke to me to look to you for things...I think for myself but your word is good enough for I've had my doubts at times..Blessings!
So a very strange thing happened to me a few weeks ago. Someone here on GAW posted that they did some digging and traced them from Vietnam (I believe). I questioned this in their livestream. The NEXT day I had nefarious activity on my FB account from a hacker on one of my posts to an outside friend. I stupidly had my full name On YouTube so easily traceable to FB account.,It was WHAT they posted which made me highly suspicious. I was blocked for a short while from their telegram chat for asking about this the next day. I still fell for them again and as much of a letdown this is, it’s better to know who we can trust. Thank you
Please define paytriot, since it can't possibly mean every patriot who sells products or earns money from his work exposing and attacking the deep state, promoting Trump and Q, etc. What is the defining feature(s) in your opinion?
Why wouldn't it?
Take this site for example. You are only believable in your beliefs imo if you don't try to sell them to followers. GA.win doesn't monetize, and that's how it should be. Q didn't monetize either, unless the Watkins had some scheme going that I am not aware of.
You are only believable in your beliefs imo if you don't try to sell them to followers.
Ever been to a church? It goes like this: "Here's some beliefs....now here's the collection plate. Give us ten percent of all the money you made last week. Not net, either, but the gross." They say it's going to God, but he already has literally everything there is; so they keep it instead. Tax free, too, unlike the Q researchers and decoders.
How the idea that making money is bad—even if done morally and ethically, without stealing or cheating—ever crept into this group I will never know. If people can't understand that others who make a vocation of devoting vast portions of their waking hours to this, for us to consume and share, still need to eat and feed their families, then that's OK. Personally I don't see anything wrong with getting paid to do stellar work that advances the cause of liberty, but we can agree to disagree.
My definition is that a paytriot cares more about money than the movement. There has to be a line drawn somewhere or every content creator including Redpill78 and X22report who have ads in their videos and Praying Medic and NeonRevolt who wrote educational books about Q are all paytriots.
Back when Q used to actively post, Dave Hayes (Praying Medic) each day would create a tweet and a video presenting each Q drop, decoding it, relating it to others, drawing connections, etc. My wife and I found his material tremendously helpful and straightforward, his delivery honest and unpretentious. He never gave the impression of caring first and foremost about getting rich, just trying to support himself while he provided valuable service and hope to patriots and Trump lovers worldwide. His book explaining Q also is excellent. Is it not worth a book being written to explain it? Must the author be independently wealthy or able to live off scraps of garbage in order to be legit? He was doing nothing else but Q full time for a long time.
I'm not sure how a person could support themself doing that if they didn't try to monetize it. The animosity against the American entrepreneurial spirit that's on display here is puzzling and actually comes off more than a little sanctimonious.
So we as patriots agree to disagree. I refuse to demonize those who monetize when they're demonstrating a solid work ethic and patriotism and sharing good quality data.
They were hyper in thanking peeps for donating money and did it way too much for me-the MC of this shitshow had me bored in 2 minutes-now we know where the Nigerian prince gets his money.. :P
Reject the null. Prove a hypothesis true AND ALSO prove that it is not untrue. The provided info only proves what was said is true, but no one has yet proved that it is not untrue. That's where 'doing your own research' would fit in there.
Wow!! If you say it, I believe it....??
You were the first one I trusted when I got here...something about you spoke to me to look to you for things...I think for myself but your word is good enough for I've had my doubts at times..Blessings!
Yes but don't take anyone's word as good enough, not even Q's. Q himself guides us to do our own research and think for ourselves
So a very strange thing happened to me a few weeks ago. Someone here on GAW posted that they did some digging and traced them from Vietnam (I believe). I questioned this in their livestream. The NEXT day I had nefarious activity on my FB account from a hacker on one of my posts to an outside friend. I stupidly had my full name On YouTube so easily traceable to FB account.,It was WHAT they posted which made me highly suspicious. I was blocked for a short while from their telegram chat for asking about this the next day. I still fell for them again and as much of a letdown this is, it’s better to know who we can trust. Thank you
Please define paytriot, since it can't possibly mean every patriot who sells products or earns money from his work exposing and attacking the deep state, promoting Trump and Q, etc. What is the defining feature(s) in your opinion?
Thanx
Why wouldn't it? Take this site for example. You are only believable in your beliefs imo if you don't try to sell them to followers. GA.win doesn't monetize, and that's how it should be. Q didn't monetize either, unless the Watkins had some scheme going that I am not aware of.
Ever been to a church? It goes like this: "Here's some beliefs....now here's the collection plate. Give us ten percent of all the money you made last week. Not net, either, but the gross." They say it's going to God, but he already has literally everything there is; so they keep it instead. Tax free, too, unlike the Q researchers and decoders.
How the idea that making money is bad—even if done morally and ethically, without stealing or cheating—ever crept into this group I will never know. If people can't understand that others who make a vocation of devoting vast portions of their waking hours to this, for us to consume and share, still need to eat and feed their families, then that's OK. Personally I don't see anything wrong with getting paid to do stellar work that advances the cause of liberty, but we can agree to disagree.
My definition is that a paytriot cares more about money than the movement. There has to be a line drawn somewhere or every content creator including Redpill78 and X22report who have ads in their videos and Praying Medic and NeonRevolt who wrote educational books about Q are all paytriots.
Thanks for replying.
Back when Q used to actively post, Dave Hayes (Praying Medic) each day would create a tweet and a video presenting each Q drop, decoding it, relating it to others, drawing connections, etc. My wife and I found his material tremendously helpful and straightforward, his delivery honest and unpretentious. He never gave the impression of caring first and foremost about getting rich, just trying to support himself while he provided valuable service and hope to patriots and Trump lovers worldwide. His book explaining Q also is excellent. Is it not worth a book being written to explain it? Must the author be independently wealthy or able to live off scraps of garbage in order to be legit? He was doing nothing else but Q full time for a long time.
I'm not sure how a person could support themself doing that if they didn't try to monetize it. The animosity against the American entrepreneurial spirit that's on display here is puzzling and actually comes off more than a little sanctimonious.
So we as patriots agree to disagree. I refuse to demonize those who monetize when they're demonstrating a solid work ethic and patriotism and sharing good quality data.
They were hyper in thanking peeps for donating money and did it way too much for me-the MC of this shitshow had me bored in 2 minutes-now we know where the Nigerian prince gets his money.. :P
I'm reading all your writing....links dont lie...proof is proof...puzzle pieces are fitting....thanks for your efforts in shining the light on this.
Reject the null. Prove a hypothesis true AND ALSO prove that it is not untrue. The provided info only proves what was said is true, but no one has yet proved that it is not untrue. That's where 'doing your own research' would fit in there.
You all have taught me much since I arrived here....I am grateful....? Blessings frens
Prove it is not untrue = ?