LOT of flakes..one minute they have photos that no one but those close to Trump would have then a week later they are the bad guys....geez IDK either way , just saying that some of you MOFOs get flipped pretty easiliy.
I have been away from the forum for a few days and this George stuff is really weird. Why were they referring to themselves as Anonymous before George News and exposing this stuff years ago?
I don't know. Something just seems off about all of this.
why does everyone say if you go against the grain here.....your a shill....think......if...you ...dont...follow...the .....rules.....you....CAN FUCK OFF.
I agree. The jury is still out for me on George it could be A trump insider or a Chinese puppet. The one thing that kinda threw me off was they were selling shirts and stuff and someone who is just trying to get the truth out shouldn't be worried about money, But that doesn't make them bad. Time will tell as with a lot of other things.
I never disliked GEORGE I actually like some of the content. But they seemed to be slinging hopium when nobody had any. the sure seemed to be privy to the situation and exploited the vague doubt that alot of us were feeling at the time. me being a hopium addict. thats why I am here.
U may be right. We need hopium when things get stagnant. they seen it and went over the top....some sucked it up the opposite worked on some. The adults in the room are obvious. I like seeing george stuff once in a while. But waiting for a live chat like a high school girl waiting for the backstreet boys 20 yrsago is ridiculous. these guys took advantage. then when asked about it bans and crickets no explanation.
LOT of flakes..one minute they have photos that no one but those close to Trump would have then a week later they are the bad guys....geez IDK either way , just saying that some of you MOFOs get flipped pretty easiliy.
I have been away from the forum for a few days and this George stuff is really weird. Why were they referring to themselves as Anonymous before George News and exposing this stuff years ago?
I don't know. Something just seems off about all of this.
I think that a lot of buried-deep shills on both sites have been activated.
WE ARE FINALLY IN THE 3RD ACT OF THIS MOVIE.
amen .... have a sammich.....new one salmon salad......
why does everyone say if you go against the grain here.....your a shill....think......if...you ...dont...follow...the .....rules.....you....CAN FUCK OFF.
They answered this in the comments on telegram this morning:
"Because at the time, we wanted to remain... anonymous :) GEORGE is more than one.. so a Collective. What do Charities do? They SERVE ???"
Decide for yourself.
Dude as soon as you don’t agree with someone here you get called a shill
Hey guys we’ve got another one right here xD
I agree. The jury is still out for me on George it could be A trump insider or a Chinese puppet. The one thing that kinda threw me off was they were selling shirts and stuff and someone who is just trying to get the truth out shouldn't be worried about money, But that doesn't make them bad. Time will tell as with a lot of other things.
I never disliked GEORGE I actually like some of the content. But they seemed to be slinging hopium when nobody had any. the sure seemed to be privy to the situation and exploited the vague doubt that alot of us were feeling at the time. me being a hopium addict. thats why I am here.
That could have been the bait.
agreed are you saying we might need to start a HA here?
U may be right. We need hopium when things get stagnant. they seen it and went over the top....some sucked it up the opposite worked on some. The adults in the room are obvious. I like seeing george stuff once in a while. But waiting for a live chat like a high school girl waiting for the backstreet boys 20 yrsago is ridiculous. these guys took advantage. then when asked about it bans and crickets no explanation.
Their content comes from other sources es So i don't need them
You may have missed that content otherwise. It's good to get a quick recap of happenings like WinsAnon does.
Well banning a person for asking the difficult questions is not what a legit sight would do.
I would rather have no news than fake news.