This is the most important comment here. This is a blatant privacy violation under federal law. They should be arrestes and shut down for demanding this "proof"
Eh in this case it'd be a small enough lawsuit that they'd probably get busted, only for the lawsuit to get a lot of news/traction because of the precedent it sets.
You never know, but it seems like they still have to very carefully curate the ones they rig.
Although this is not a HIPAA situation, I do think HIPAA should be used in a lawsuit.
HIPAA only applies to health care administrators in the billing department and health insurance companies or Medicare administrators. It applies when the service provider provides patient records for purpose of billing and payment.
Those people are required to keep records confidential.
The interesting thing is that it is a huge fine for a violation. The fine is $250,000.
I think that is clear evidence that the federal government takes seriously the security and confidentiality of health records, and should be justification for suing a private business for $250,000 for demanding disclosure of health records.
Don't know what a court would do with it, but it would be worth pursuing to see what happens.
You cannot demand that anyone divulge sensitive medical information about themselves nor can you release that information about someone else without thwir express written permission (such as you would see in an informed consent form in clinical trials, where certain pieces of health information are collected and used for analysis). This is against the law.
Someone needs to sue them for HIPAA violations
This is the most important comment here. This is a blatant privacy violation under federal law. They should be arrestes and shut down for demanding this "proof"
Its actually not, and anyone who tells you otherwise is wrong.
Hi handshake, did you come here to glow?
I'm a physician, I know HIPAA. Go away
Covid is a hoax, bro.
Screw your book-selling link.
Screw your book-selling fagotry.
And a massive lawsuit to make a painful example out of them for others to see.
Agreed but what are the chances of a legit judge and not an idiot put there under some special conditions except knowing law ( communist ) ?
Eh in this case it'd be a small enough lawsuit that they'd probably get busted, only for the lawsuit to get a lot of news/traction because of the precedent it sets.
You never know, but it seems like they still have to very carefully curate the ones they rig.
THERE IS NO LAW. Show the law. Show the proof of face-diapering effectiveness. And not some blatherings by the CommunistDemonCriminals.....
Although this is not a HIPAA situation, I do think HIPAA should be used in a lawsuit.
HIPAA only applies to health care administrators in the billing department and health insurance companies or Medicare administrators. It applies when the service provider provides patient records for purpose of billing and payment.
Those people are required to keep records confidential.
The interesting thing is that it is a huge fine for a violation. The fine is $250,000.
I think that is clear evidence that the federal government takes seriously the security and confidentiality of health records, and should be justification for suing a private business for $250,000 for demanding disclosure of health records.
Don't know what a court would do with it, but it would be worth pursuing to see what happens.
You cannot demand that anyone divulge sensitive medical information about themselves nor can you release that information about someone else without thwir express written permission (such as you would see in an informed consent form in clinical trials, where certain pieces of health information are collected and used for analysis). This is against the law.
Until, of course, the demoncraps pass a law making it an exception.