those complaining about citizenjournalist
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (194)
sorted by:
look up at the top and see the buildings behind this....buhahahaha
There are many here that are having a problem understanding how camera angles are at play in these two photos.
It's a pretty crude sketch but it will explain why the 2nd floor can't be seen in one of the pictures.
https://i.maga.host/M6mJZjn.png
I don't think they are having trouble understanding the perspective angles, I think they are assuming the wrong things about the architecture. ...along with wanting to believe Biden is anywhere but the Shite House. (Holy shit, that's a legit typo! But I'm leaving it because that's what it is with a turd inside. Kekity kek!)
The 2nd story architecture of the actual White House West Wing from the Garden Entrance is NOT a full 2nd story. This is what everyone is assuming/remembering. From the street it is a full 2 stories (maybe a bit more), but from the Garden side, it is 1 + 1/4 stories (or 1 full story & a 2nd story that is terraced). In other words, the 2nd story that most are assuming looks the same as the street side is actually a quarter-story/raised ceiling with normal-width but short-height windows. The whole second story is very short. It is also significantly inset off the edge of the 1st story wall by quite a distance, moreso than I thought--At least by a whole hallway or room's width.
The whole 2nd story from the garden side is short & inset enough to get cut off by perspective if viewed from a close enough camera placement.
Knowing & comparing to the actual Garden-Side West Wing White House structure (use photo references from aerial & other angles, not just the two given & your memory), the camera placements, FOVs, & angles of both photos actually work out & the argument that the buildings in both photos are the same is plausible.
I know because I made the same assumption about the 2nd story, and when I went to verify whether my memory of the architecture was correct, I found that I was mistaken. I actually agreed with Mike overall (that the Biden House looks the same as the White House from Trump's term), but I thought these could be two different entrances at different wing areas instead of two different perspectives. I had to be sure of the architecture to verify my own theory, though, and I ended up proving him right when I set out to correct him.
Fucking Kek.
Internet culture at it's finest! I'm sorry I doubted you, senpai.
P.S.
You know that INTJ meme where they always sit in front of the computer writing & constructing complex arguments that prove people wrong because they cannot allow a comment with false information to exist unopposed on the internet? I feel like I've been out-INTJed. I'll be damned. Kek.
Spez: Here are better photos for the multitudes who are too lazy to google good angles for themselves:
Overall Aerial: https://c8.alamy.com/comp/W7FY7B/aerial-view-of-the-white-house-washington-dc-W7FY7B.jpg
West Wing Aerial Garden-Side Close-Up: https://www.jfklibrary.org/sites/default/files/archives/JFKWHP/1962/Month%2007/Day%2008/JFKWHP-1962-07-08-A/JFKWHP-KN-C22687.jpg
West Wing Garden Grounds View (from a bit further back than the Biden photo was taken, which allows you to see more of the short/inset 2nd story): https://dynaimage.cdn.cnn.com/cnn/c_fill,g_auto,w_1200,h_675,ar_16:9/https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F200510173815-02-white-house-west-wing-file.jpg
West Wing Street View (where you see the full 2+ stories): https://assets.realclear.com/images/42/422707_5_.jpg
P.S. I am only making my conclusions based on the cropped & edited pictures OP gave us. I don't know where to find the originals, (or feel like looking them up, to be frank), which would allow me to see the full picture & background uncropped/edited (not necessary, but helpful to keep things more in context).
P.P.S. For Keks' sake, I dare you all to downvote me. I get that we don't want to believe Biden is really president, but we shouldn't stick our heads up our asses regarding things mathematically verifiable. I estimated the math in my head. I did exactly this sort of shit for my master's thesis in optics, and I can do the math on paper to work it out. IF I AM WRONG, TAKE AWAY MY FUCKING DEGREE, lol.
Also, Please note, this does not prove that Biden is not in an exceptionally accurate model White House, but unless the background is 'shopped in from a very similar angle (possible, but less likely than the theory that Biden is in the literal gilded cage surrounded by literal guards), it is unlikely.
LMAO to your post script.
i was getting pretty frustrated over this issue because i knew what was happening with the pictures, but i lack writing skills. i struggle to put the right words together to form a solid argument... thats why i drew the picture lol.
i made a video trying to explain what i was getting at, its uploading now
What am I missing here, because from what I can see the first photographer seems to be standing further back. Compare number of columns and window heights.
The first photographer should be able to see the 2nd floor better.
You're missing Mike Rothschild trying to shill you lol
This might help
https://i.maga.host/M6mJZjn.png
I saw that already, what I am saying is that you have the photographers positions swapped. The top is taken from further back (note the relative size of the windows in the background and the wider field of view). Thus the top photograph SHOULD have the better angle to see the 2nd floor.
Also have to consider that the further one back has to zoom in
Bruh if they were further away but had to zoom, the windows still wouldn't be smaller.
the decorative pieces above the columns are there in both pictures. look again.
I voted you up for telling me to look again I opened the image in it's own page they're definitely there.
God bless you. This is what I was noticing. All the crap about the second story was just noise. You posting this, made me look closer. They are there. Moving on! Thanks.
I did, they're there in some form or other. But there's no windows, there's air conditioning equipment and open sky.
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/Fx9BvSGN.jpeg
In light of this photograph from another thread I agree it's the perspectives,
I was wrong you're right about it not being in Culver City but it's the real white house.
Bruh! As others stated below, the first one is further away and the windows are smaller, so it isn't zoom.
My first thought bt was that maybe to was the angle but your drawing proved to me that that isn't it. Thanks for the drawing.
Look at the fucking building's facade. You can't fake missing pieces, anon.
Here's a picture from 2009 where the corbels are also very hard to see because of a lack of angled sunlight.
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/the-west-wing-white-house-washington-dc-usa-royalty-free-image/157479121
The corbels are there in both pictures, it's just hard to see in top one because there is no shadows. Go look again, you'll see.
Yeah this is the only thing I see that doesnt make sense.
Edit: the Biden one is taken at a lower angle and farther away. It’s catching the top of the building rather than the windows. Biden is in the real whitehouse. People need to stop with this
Look at the architecture... There are 4 Corbels and what appears to be a second floor to the structure, on the top there are no corbels and buildings behind it, no second story to the building.
The corbels are there they just aren't as visible. What interests me more is the second story in the lower picture. Of course, that could have been shopped in upper photo.
https://www.google.com/search?q=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjP4K_HlK7vAhUOAlMKHa57CgkQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoCCAA6BAgAEB46BggAEAUQHjoGCAAQCBAeUMr4AVj0lgJgn5sCaABwAHgAgAGRAogB5g6SAQU0LjQuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&sclient=img&ei=jydNYI_dOI6EzAKu96lI&bih=663&biw=1280&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS751US760#imgrc=1_EeHO3xx5TiiM&imgdii=EMjo39STAQksjM
This angle of things makes it seem like it could just be a camera elevation eye trick...
the corbels are harder to see because the lack of shadows from a cloudy day.
above the roof line... what we are seeing is a difference of perspective from the photographers. one was taken up close, while the other photo was taken from further back but zoomed in. the further you are from the building, the more will be visible above the roof line. https://i.maga.host/M6mJZjn.png
look at the tree on the left, its the same size and shape and location in both photos.
conclusion: Richard was worked up and made a mistake. it happens to the best of us.
Forget the corbels. Try to match the 2nd floor windows
https://www.google.com/search?q=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjP4K_HlK7vAhUOAlMKHa57CgkQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoCCAA6BAgAEB46BggAEAUQHjoGCAAQCBAeUMr4AVj0lgJgn5sCaABwAHgAgAGRAogB5g6SAQU0LjQuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&sclient=img&ei=jydNYI_dOI6EzAKu96lI&bih=663&biw=1280&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS751US760#imgrc=1_EeHO3xx5TiiM&imgdii=EMjo39STAQksjM
From this angle it appears it might be real. I do believe its a camera elevation issue. I don't want them to be there, but it could be legit.
There are many here that are having a problem understanding how camera angles are at play in these two photos.
It's a pretty crude sketch but it will explain why the 2nd floor can't be seen in one of the pictures.
https://i.maga.host/M6mJZjn.png
lets do an experiment!
if you live in a two story home and you walk onto your front lawn and look back at your house. look up! do you see the shingles on your roof? no, of course not.
now walk across the street and look back at your house. look up!, do you see the shingles on your house? Yes!
this is perspective. one photo was taken up close, while the other photo was taken from further away but zoomed in. this is what you are seeing
It’s taken from a different angle. Find an Ariel view of the same place and you will understand
I looked this up in Google Earth and measured the distances. The building Trump is standing in front of is actually a one-story building which is an extension/annexe to a taller main building. The so called "second story" windows belong to the main building further back, and are located 13 m behind the wall section with the corbels. This means that a small change of perspective, i.e. taking the photo a little bit closer to the podium, could make these windows disappear from the photo. That said, these images are too cropped to determine this either way with any certainty.
Yup!
There are many here that are having a problem understanding how camera angles are at play in these two photos.
It's a pretty crude sketch but it will explain why the 2nd floor can't be seen in one of the pictures.
https://i.maga.host/M6mJZjn.png
Those were not taken at the same place. Those are not the same buildings.
https://www.google.com/search?q=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjP4K_HlK7vAhUOAlMKHa57CgkQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=culver+city+white+house+rose+garden&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoCCAA6BAgAEB46BggAEAUQHjoGCAAQCBAeUMr4AVj0lgJgn5sCaABwAHgAgAGRAogB5g6SAQU0LjQuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&sclient=img&ei=jydNYI_dOI6EzAKu96lI&bih=663&biw=1280&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS751US760#imgrc=1_EeHO3xx5TiiM&imgdii=EMjo39STAQksjM
I wanted to say the same thing also, but this angle shows it might be camera manipulation.
I’m w you. If you look at other photos the tree to the left has the exact same branch structure as the one seen photographed w Trump. These posts are all over telegram which is so annoying.
There's a lot of people who have trouble understanding how the camera angles are working against you.
This is a crude sketch but it should definitely explain what you are seeing.
https://i.maga.host/M6mJZjn.png
You won't get through to them.
This place has become overrun by facebook boomer big brains who think everything is a fake movie.