GOOGLE top executive STEPS DOWN. NCSWIC
(www.businessinsider.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (95)
sorted by:
Because people get new jobs, progress in their careers, make decisions to try something new. What is so surprising about this?
You either clearly don't get it making you an idiot or you are simply here to muddy the waters. I'll let you determine which category you fall into while letting you know that thus far you've only succeeded in appearing to be an idiot.
I suspect you aren’t a white collar professional with experience moving around to new roles and new firms. This is not atypical, rather it is normal course. Sorry to burst your narrative.
lmao you think the 80+ year old billionaire who is accused of human trafficking just decided to get a new job. haha.
If the picture in the article is recent and accurate, the exec looks around 35 - 40.
What are you even talking about? The linked article is about some VP-level dude who looks to be in his 40s or 50s?
Lmao
Agree. People don't typically stay at jobs as long as they used to in the past.
I’ll give you the google guy being possibly random business.
Since you are a white collar professional, explain why Jeff Bezos walked away from Amazon without any shareholder warning. No transition announcement. He just randomly decided to not be CEO anymore.
In what universe is it normal for the CEO of one of the largest businesses on earth to do this? And even crazier, no ones even seems to have noticed. Or the media did notice, especially financial media, and decided not to talk about it.
You remember Enron. A CEO of this level just quietly leaving one day only means one thing. It wasn’t planned.
Wexner and Bezos cannot be explained, if you are viewing them through the lens of typical white collar behavior.
Believe it or not, yes, even CEOs sometimes spontaneously decide to do something different, to take time off, etc. That is quite literally the ending for every CEO who doesn’t retire at the end of tenure or otherwise isn’t terminated sooner. And the Enron comparison is really not useful, sorry to say.
I agree. Just because an exec moves on, which happens all the time, doesn't necessarily mean there were other forces at play.
incase you dont know how to scroll up to read the post that you responded to... it said:
"This guy and Wexner or whatever from Victoria's Secret. Pedo Joe and the DemonRats are in control then why all these people fleeing?"