GOOGLE top executive STEPS DOWN. NCSWIC
(www.businessinsider.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (95)
sorted by:
You either clearly don't get it making you an idiot or you are simply here to muddy the waters. I'll let you determine which category you fall into while letting you know that thus far you've only succeeded in appearing to be an idiot.
I suspect you aren’t a white collar professional with experience moving around to new roles and new firms. This is not atypical, rather it is normal course. Sorry to burst your narrative.
lmao you think the 80+ year old billionaire who is accused of human trafficking just decided to get a new job. haha.
If the picture in the article is recent and accurate, the exec looks around 35 - 40.
What are you even talking about? The linked article is about some VP-level dude who looks to be in his 40s or 50s?
im talking about les wexner who was half of the post that you responded to; try to keep up
Lmao
Agree. People don't typically stay at jobs as long as they used to in the past.
I’ll give you the google guy being possibly random business.
Since you are a white collar professional, explain why Jeff Bezos walked away from Amazon without any shareholder warning. No transition announcement. He just randomly decided to not be CEO anymore.
In what universe is it normal for the CEO of one of the largest businesses on earth to do this? And even crazier, no ones even seems to have noticed. Or the media did notice, especially financial media, and decided not to talk about it.
You remember Enron. A CEO of this level just quietly leaving one day only means one thing. It wasn’t planned.
Wexner and Bezos cannot be explained, if you are viewing them through the lens of typical white collar behavior.
Believe it or not, yes, even CEOs sometimes spontaneously decide to do something different, to take time off, etc. That is quite literally the ending for every CEO who doesn’t retire at the end of tenure or otherwise isn’t terminated sooner. And the Enron comparison is really not useful, sorry to say.
Of course it’s useful. Skilling leaving without any warning or transition plan for unspecified family reasons is the kick that started the dominos.
I just can’t take you seriously if you actually think it’s normal for CEOs at that level to not inform shareholders ahead of time when CEOs transition. You are objectively wrong.
We are looking at information for things that tie in with Q's predictions. I'm sure you think Q is crazy non-sense, but Q said multiple times to look for resignations and to keep lists of resignations. It's not to say that everything that occurs is related to Q, but we take it into account. Q proves that what he says is legitimate by a series of coincidences, with the tagline of "How many coincidences until mathematically impossible?" So when big resignations happen, we are of course looking at it. Is every one of them related to Q? Are any of them related to Q? That remains to be seen.