Are there any statistics showing how many pregnant women have received the vaccine and how many have lost the baby? It would be very difficult to wriggle out of that one, especially if it was withon a short timeframe of receiving it
Oh that’s so tragic! It kills me that people are so naive and allow someone else to dictate what is healthy for them without researching it themselves. To be fair, we have been told over & over again that doctors know best and listening to them saves lives and that programming is on “fool” display. ☹️
They are liable to prosecution under the Nuremberg Laws of 1947, this states it is a crime against humanity to give anyone an experimental and/or untested drug or vaccine without their permission.
"I was only obeying orders" is not a defence under these laws, there are very severe punishments if found guilty.
That’s not true. If it was 1 in a million, a 366% increase would now be 4.6 in a million.
Anytime you see very rounded numbers like “366” you can assume sample size was very small, because if it were large the fraction would be more volatile, like 319.7 —- in this case if you look at the article it’s indeed small, I think they had data on only 4 additional miscarriages or something w Pfizer, I skimmed this article earlier.
Prepare to get barraged if you share this w a pro-vaccine person, this is not a good article at all and is misleading which only makes us look worse imo
Consider you have a shot that prevents miscarriages. If 10 people took the shot at 1 had a miscarriage, then they made the shot even more effective and 1000 people took it and 3 had a miscarriage, a headline of “miscarriages increase 200% under new modified shot” would be factually correct, even though the shot is now 3,333% more effective. (Note: still suffering from low sample size but I am just giving an example of how to mislead w statistics)
Thank you for sharing this, was about to mention it myself. Sharing this article would make one look like an idiot. Now, if the next results reportedly showed a significant increase in number in relation to vaccines administered, then you have a trend.
Secondly, what is reported is far less than the actual occurrence. Only way to capture data is asking females that miscarry if they had the vaccine, then compare the difference between the two groups.
I’m going through fertility treatments at a large, major provider (it’s all they do and they are experts)... and they are pushing the vaccine on me! I’m like NO!! I will quit treatments before ever getting it if they force it.
I'm sorry but the article doesn't actually have data to support what the headline claims. It isn't reporting an increase of miscarriages vs. a baseline. It is just reporting total miscarriages over time. The total number of ANYTHING will increase over time.... I would love to see real data but this isn't helpful.
It sounds like vaccines are being implemented correctly as stated by Bill Gates. Taking this vaccine is just opting into being pare of population control. Everyone has had their fair warning.
This is true. Karmically Bill Gates, (got to pay the Bill to get past the Gates) has told us of his plot so, if we consent willingly his hands are clean. They are luciferians.
Phrases in that article such as "which is the seventh to be remhmleased" don't exactly inspire confidence. If they can't even check for obvious typos, it's unlikely that they checked the figures. 366% is surprisingly accurate but maybe they omitted the decimal point? 3.66% anyone?
It was a known side effect reported from the studies when they gave it emergency approval. Can't say they weren't warned/the information wasn't out there. Lucky for me i'm done having kids, but there's NO WAY i'd allow my kids to take the vaccine now or in the future because who knows what it would do. This could very well be a backdoor to population control.
Are there any statistics showing how many pregnant women have received the vaccine and how many have lost the baby? It would be very difficult to wriggle out of that one, especially if it was withon a short timeframe of receiving it
Problem is that miscarriages are very common anyway. I seem to recall reading 1 in 3 pregnancies end in miscarriage. Or 33.3%.
Oh that’s so tragic! It kills me that people are so naive and allow someone else to dictate what is healthy for them without researching it themselves. To be fair, we have been told over & over again that doctors know best and listening to them saves lives and that programming is on “fool” display. ☹️
Great information?
So true. Brain washed in medical school to believe poison is medicine. They are the number one cause of death if abortions are rightfully counted.
Thank you for the info and for being here.
Massive medical malpractice going on
They are liable to prosecution under the Nuremberg Laws of 1947, this states it is a crime against humanity to give anyone an experimental and/or untested drug or vaccine without their permission.
"I was only obeying orders" is not a defence under these laws, there are very severe punishments if found guilty.
Unless someone goes to alt sites like this one, they are never exposed to the counter position. They only know the approved message.
I wonder if it's also reporgramming the woman's body to view the fetus as an invading organism?
At that % you effectively neuter anyone who takes the vaccine, the effects probably wain in time tho... unless of course it's programmed not to.
That’s not true. If it was 1 in a million, a 366% increase would now be 4.6 in a million.
Anytime you see very rounded numbers like “366” you can assume sample size was very small, because if it were large the fraction would be more volatile, like 319.7 —- in this case if you look at the article it’s indeed small, I think they had data on only 4 additional miscarriages or something w Pfizer, I skimmed this article earlier.
Prepare to get barraged if you share this w a pro-vaccine person, this is not a good article at all and is misleading which only makes us look worse imo
Consider you have a shot that prevents miscarriages. If 10 people took the shot at 1 had a miscarriage, then they made the shot even more effective and 1000 people took it and 3 had a miscarriage, a headline of “miscarriages increase 200% under new modified shot” would be factually correct, even though the shot is now 3,333% more effective. (Note: still suffering from low sample size but I am just giving an example of how to mislead w statistics)
Thank you for sharing this, was about to mention it myself. Sharing this article would make one look like an idiot. Now, if the next results reportedly showed a significant increase in number in relation to vaccines administered, then you have a trend.
Secondly, what is reported is far less than the actual occurrence. Only way to capture data is asking females that miscarry if they had the vaccine, then compare the difference between the two groups.
and yet they want to start shooting their poison into little kids and babies....
They already do that.
Fucking retards.
I’m going through fertility treatments at a large, major provider (it’s all they do and they are experts)... and they are pushing the vaccine on me! I’m like NO!! I will quit treatments before ever getting it if they force it.
It sounds like when I paid the lawn guy to plant a hedge of bushes for me only for him to weed wacker it down the next week!
?
I'm sorry but the article doesn't actually have data to support what the headline claims. It isn't reporting an increase of miscarriages vs. a baseline. It is just reporting total miscarriages over time. The total number of ANYTHING will increase over time.... I would love to see real data but this isn't helpful.
It sounds like vaccines are being implemented correctly as stated by Bill Gates. Taking this vaccine is just opting into being pare of population control. Everyone has had their fair warning.
This is true. Karmically Bill Gates, (got to pay the Bill to get past the Gates) has told us of his plot so, if we consent willingly his hands are clean. They are luciferians.
I told my doctor that I will not take the vaccine and she told NOT to as if was not save for pregnant women.
This is great anti covid vax ammo
Exactly why I linked it. I want to warn people who may have pregnant family members and also red-pill the others
This is just after 6 weeks. I wonder how high the number goes up with women who aren't prego yet, but are Covid vaccinated?
Consider the headline.366%+6weeks. [Three 6's] Coincidence?
Phrases in that article such as "which is the seventh to be remhmleased" don't exactly inspire confidence. If they can't even check for obvious typos, it's unlikely that they checked the figures. 366% is surprisingly accurate but maybe they omitted the decimal point? 3.66% anyone?
It was a known side effect reported from the studies when they gave it emergency approval. Can't say they weren't warned/the information wasn't out there. Lucky for me i'm done having kids, but there's NO WAY i'd allow my kids to take the vaccine now or in the future because who knows what it would do. This could very well be a backdoor to population control.