I think this is an unlikely scenario. What if they make a super deadly new pathogen emerge that is designed for that vaccine. So everybody without the vaccine gets super sick and likely dies. That way the people that easily trust and submit to their system is the ones who survive and most of the opposition is gone. People would be like OMG this vaccine is what save half the country and we have to take these otherwise we could die. It would be an effective way for them to take over and start a population that will submit to their plan is the part of the population they can use for their agenda.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
I have an odd vaccine theory myself. Remember how "they" tried to come up with vaccines for SARS, MERS and other like diseases but, after getting the "vaccine" the animals being tested had bad reactions and most died? The vaccines were a failure, right? What if they weren't a failure, what if the results were exactly what "they" wanted?
"Most" did not die. There was a single one where all the animals died, however there have been many coronavirus experiments and on average this pathogenic priming effect caused about 5% of vaccine recipients to die. 5% of the 3B or so that will get the vaccine is brutal, but its not a depopulation level event. If these vaccines caused this effect in more than 5% of the recipients we would already know.
They don't die immediately. The plan is probably to release the worst virus that will destroy everyone that is pathogenicly primed (no functioning immune system).
God save humanity.
Do you have a link for the 5% number? I’ve seen several studies. One, like you mentioned, had almost total lethality. Another, had 25-35%.
Thank you.
You completely missed my point but, hey, Thanks for playing!
In what way did I miss your point? You said "most died". I've looked at numerous coronavirus vaccine papers going back decades. On average it was about 5%. If your downstream point was based on the false premise of "most" then the downstream point is at least as off as the premise was off.
I get that you wanted to point to pathogenic priming being an intended effect. I was pointing out that as bad as that effect has been shown to be (and 5% is really fucking bad), it wasn't as bad as you were suggesting.
I wasn't wanting to point to anything. All I did was respond to someone's theory with my own. It's just a theory, along with all the other theories on GW. My point was, what if the failed vaccine tests on animals wasn't what we were led to believe, that the "failed" tests weren't necessarily a failure for the Cabal, that they used the information gained from the "failures" to tweak the "vaccines" into something more useable for their purposes. That, maybe, just maybe, the scientists involved weren't really trying to find something effective against Sars/Mers/Covid. That, possibly, the animal testing was to see what a mRNA "vaccine" could really do to a mammal. It's great that you have read a bunch of literature on this subject, literature that is, quite possibly, not telling the whole story. And, while there are plenty of recent examples of what can happen to someone after getting inoculated, the long term effects are largely unknown to us. Plenty of theories there, too. But, I would bet that "they" already know because of the knowledge gained from the "failed" tests. Again, just a theory. Have a Great Day!
I don't "read literature" so much as critically analyze the science. I have knowledge and experience in all topics related to these matters, and I use that to dig deeper. I attempt to use what I find to reduce disinformation, intentional or (usually) unintentional.
The "literature" part of the paper or report is the part I am least likely to be influenced by. Instead I look at the science. If someone makes a mistake in the science itself, or purposefully tries to mislead with it (very uncommon), its easy to spot for another scientist. On the other hand, If someone injects bias into the discussion part of a paper (which they always do) that is not nearly as influential to me as the critical analysis of the science and data. There have been many papers where I have completely agreed with the science and completely disagreed with the conclusions of the scientists.
That is the wonderful thing about science. It is really hard to lie with science to another scientist. That is its greatest strength. It is however really easy to lie about science in the literature to a non-scientist (or scientist that doesn't look deeper). It's important to not conflate those two distinct communications.
Agreed. Animal testing should have been done, especially on the pathogenic priming effect. Instead it is being done broad scale on humanity at large, with an attempt in this experiment to not even have a control group. There are so many violations of the Nuremberg code in this vaccine development and rollout it is sickening.
Having said that, we can extrapolate from the decades of tests that have been done on both the lipid nanoparticles they are using as a delivery system and coronavirus vaccines in general. Given those decades of data there are legitimate and frightening concerns that need to be discussed and brought out into the open. But there are also concerns that many people have that have no basis in any other tests or in cell or molecular biology. It is those I try to nip in the bud.
If a concern has no basis, even if it is stated by a medical doctor, its really important that it not become a fear in the population. There are enough real things to be concerned about. We don't need to create more out of thin air, or mischaracterize the ones that do exist beyond what the data would suggest.
A note on the opinions of medical doctors: I have worked with many. They generally do not have sufficient knowledge on bio-nanotechnology or cell and molecular biology to be giving advice or warnings. That doesn't mean all M.D.s are insufficiently armed, but in my experience, unless they are a specialist in a field where they are required to have this knowledge (oncologist e.g.) or an M.D. Ph.D, then they most likely don't. There are exceptions to that rule, but it is a good general rule. Its something to keep in mind when doing your own research.
As for your theory:
Do I think they tweaked the virus and/or vaccines for nefarious purposes?
Virus yes. I think that is highly likely and there is no small amount of data and other information to support that conclusion.
Vaccine maybe. I know what's in the vaccines (at least as advertised). I think they are genuine in scope. I think they don't care about who gets hurt because they think in numbers, present and future, and not in the individuals that make up those numbers. They could easily test for an allergic reaction for example prior to administration of the vaccines, but they choose not to.
I think they want a genuine test of these technologies for future, possibly more nefarious implementations. I think they don't care if 5% of the people die later, and if that does happen it presents a perfect opportunity to call it "a horrible variant" of the virus. Not testing for that may have been (and likely was) intentional, but it was almost certainly not an intentional outcome in previous vaccines tests. It didn't become a worse problem as time went on in the literature. They weren't selecting for this effect, quite the contrary.
Might they have created the virus to express this specific protein JUST so they could make a vaccine that also expressed this specific protein JUST so that the pathogenic priming effect would kill a certain amount of the population? I think this is unlikely for a couple reasons. One, biology is far to complicated to predict such a thing. Two, we would already know if it was more than 5% of the vaccine recipients. An effect like pathogenic priming is generally a reduced risk over time, not increased. Many more people would be dying from this effect already if that was the case.
which is? I think they tested this on their Chinese internment prisoners of this covid and vaccine first.
I’m not opposed to dying a free man, so whatever happens, my outcome is solidified.
I do not think it is likely they will release "a worse virus" to kill off the unvaccinated. In fact, I think that is HIGHLY unlikely. Though I admit that it is not impossible.
Having said that, if it did happen, they would have to use the same spike protein used in these vaccines. If they did, you could use the same defenses against that future virus since they are specific to the receptor those spike proteins attack. Those defenses are vitamin D + K + Zn, along with enough other vitamins to not be deficient (notably B, C, Mg). Both HCQ and Ivermectin would also help.
yes it would same receptor as the other man made viruses such as MERS. They could easily come out with some H5N1, HEMORAGIC FEVER, AEROSOLIZED EBOLA, ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT BACTERIA, FUNGAL, etc. Lets not kid ourselves that science couldn't prevent a hyper deadly pathogen with the same receptor site that has a 90% death rate and some vitamins and hydroxychloriquine is all it would take. It is so naive to believe there isn't a serious virus that requires extreme depopulation like event without a fast treatment/cure.
The so-called 'vaccine' introduces deadly pathogens into the human body. Next winter will see a massive die off in those who have been vaccinated as cytokine storms will be triggered by the seasonal flu.
The flu will not do it, because the vaccines are not causing an immune response to the flu virus. They are causing an immune response to the spike protein on SARS-cov-2 (unless they ALL aren't what they say they are which is unlikely). If this happens (which is definitely a possibility) it is unlikely to be more than 5% of the vaccinated. That was the average of all the experiments going back decades, and if it was more, we would already know.
Doesn't that make them dangerous to the unvaccinated?
Make what dangerous to the unvaxxed?
Alex Jones has data which shows the 'vaccine' creates the prion responsible for Krutzfeld-Jacobs disease. https://www.bitchute.com/video/9Qb6OhTrc7Pc/ Coincidentally, there are pockets of mad cow disease appearing all over the place.
There was a Video made by a doctor who is against the Vaccine and recommends vitamin D, Zinc etc..... that doctor stated the large doses of Vitamin D can PREVENT cytokine storms......something to remember. link is here https://www.bitchute.com/video/InH89amCpy7S/
What if they make a new deadly pathogen that is designed to strike hardest at those WITH the vaccine? But spin the story that it's the unvaccinated who are the source and/or causing the spread.The vaxxed then pursue the unvaxxed with a vengeance.
theoretically they could do both honestly
Except Trump said to take it if you want. Unlikely indeed.
We can't assume Trump knows everything and has the time or background to understand these complex virology and immunology implications.
That is a major piece or goal of the nwo. Of course he knows.
Probably Zinc, HCQ and a Z pack would take care of the problem.
yes it would same receptor as the other man made viruses such as MERS. They could easily come out with some H5N1, HEMORAGIC FEVER, AEROSOLIZED EBOLA, ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT BACTERIA, FUNGAL, etc. Lets not kid ourselves that science couldn't prevent a hyper deadly pathogen with the same receptor site that has a 90% death rate and some vitamins and hydroxychloriquine is all it would take. It is so naive to believe there isn't a serious virus that requires extreme depopulation like event without a fast treatment/cure.
That protocol works on other viruses, too. HCQ helps make the cell’s membrane more porous. The Zinc is to get inside the cell and stop the virus from replicating. The Z pack is for secondary bacterial infections from a weakened immune system.
This is a horrifying theory
No. Because vaccine science (whatever good exists in the field) is inexact at best.
In a real pandemic scenario it would be more likely that there would be a "real" vaccine and a distributed vaccine.
Otherwise it would likely be a binary weapon where half is pervasive and the other half can be avoided if known.
IDK this mRNA shot was literally created to counter Bioweapons as part of DARPA. It is certainly possible they could do this and a spike antibody could be a powerful antidote to a future super deadly gain of function vaccine. Could have adverse effects in some or a feature of additives but a legit prophylactic to something very deadly.
The truth is WE ARE THE VACCINE, because in reality THEY ARE THE FKN DISEASE.
At it's core who has been infecting and multiplying zombies with their hypno spells ? Every day they spew brain eating amoebas that latch onto people's subconscious.
No one needs to be " watching TV " to be affected. U just need to be near the noise. People are being attacked via mind poison and they don't even realize it. Then while infected they go parrot mockingbird bs and help infect others.
If it were not for researchers, critical thinkers, Patriots spreading light America would have done fallen long ago. Truth, however it's administered, is our only way forward, otherwise the patient dies or we go to war.
I think this thesis is dead wrong. A good immune system can handle all viruses and bacterias. Why? That is what God designed. I make a bet of 1 kg of pure gold. You can throw at me Covid, Sars and HIV at the same time, if I survive 3 month, you owe me 3 kg of gold, if not I loose my 1 kg of gold.
You don't understand bioweapons very well. All I am saying is they have the capabilities to pull this off.
Proof?
That was the exact reason DARPA funded the creation to counteract bioweapons. If you can bind where a bioweapon enters the cell you can stop its affect. mRNA can be scaled up quickly. This virus doesn't call for it though and the contaminants and whatnot are worrisome.
Mother nature has tried this forever. However they want the opposite. They don't want a 7B population that is submissive, they want a 500M population that is educated and compliant.
If already 1/3rd have been vaxxed, they would be left with +2B people
They are pushing the vaxx hard and want the population reduced. They traffick children. Poleddle drugs. Start Wars and drop bombs.
They would more likely use the vaxx as a trojan horse to mrna some bad shit.
To kill the unvaccinated they'd have to release something that would kill everyone. I dont think there is anything they could release that would protect the vaccinated. Quite the opposite. In fact thats why they are pushing for everyone to get vaccinated. So when the release the next lab mutated covid variant it kills more at a greater percentage. Rinse and repeat. Year after year. The unvaccinated will survive.
100% they could release something that would kill un prepared and be protected by their vaccine. That is how the biowarfare programs and weapons work.
We've watched at least fifteen hours of different videos digging into vaccines and viruses. I don't believe vaccines have ever worked as claimed. Clint Richardson's Red Pill Sunday School and Dr R. E. Tent's "Exploding Autoimmune Epidemic" give a very disturbing picture of how our present state of nonhealth has been created unnaturally.