Yeah, they are called neural networks and they learn by running repeated iterations of the problem and the neural network is formed during this process. Yeah, it's not AI but it is machine learning and it's not programming in ANY traditional sense AND it's been around for fucking years.
Yeah, neural networks was the 1.0 name. Now we're onto AI, machine learning and deep learning since neural networks didn't catch on that well.
A neural network is programming in a traditional sense. It's running a program. The program happens to have a feedback loop which continually updates statistical metrics on the weighting of inputs against the output.
A traditional sense is visual basic or C++ not training a neural network. I would accept that a human is in a sense programming the network but "traditional sense" is a bridge too far in this case.
Come back to me when you can think of a computer following its own instructions. And I'm not talking about a human written program telling the machine how to create a new program to run itself. That's still the computer following the instructions of the human.
Reading comprehension? I never said it was AI, in fact I specifically said it wasn't. I said it was not traditional programming. Here let me help you:-
Traditional programming Input + Program = Output / Neural Net: Input + Output = Program. It's irrefutably different.
Yeah, they are called neural networks and they learn by running repeated iterations of the problem and the neural network is formed during this process. Yeah, it's not AI but it is machine learning and it's not programming in ANY traditional sense AND it's been around for fucking years.
Yeah, neural networks was the 1.0 name. Now we're onto AI, machine learning and deep learning since neural networks didn't catch on that well.
A neural network is programming in a traditional sense. It's running a program. The program happens to have a feedback loop which continually updates statistical metrics on the weighting of inputs against the output.
A traditional sense is visual basic or C++ not training a neural network. I would accept that a human is in a sense programming the network but "traditional sense" is a bridge too far in this case.
Come back to me when you can think of a computer following its own instructions. And I'm not talking about a human written program telling the machine how to create a new program to run itself. That's still the computer following the instructions of the human.
Reading comprehension? I never said it was AI, in fact I specifically said it wasn't. I said it was not traditional programming. Here let me help you:-
Traditional programming Input + Program = Output / Neural Net: Input + Output = Program. It's irrefutably different.