Looks fake to me but then again, who knows... Tweet is claiming organ harvest is in progress in this video. NSFL: GORE
(nitter.cc)
? These people are sick! ?
Comments (19)
sorted by:
I find this extremely hard to believe. Organ procurement is a sterile surgical procedure.
Time to wake up,my friend.
In case tweet is removed, I've downloaded the video and uploaded it elsewhere so here's the link.
Many bodies had "stem to stern" incisions sutured up. These are from the top of chest to just above the public area. These incisions are made in giant Trauma/Cancer cases or ( likely here) postmortem organ donation.
Here, who knows if the people were dead before starting the donation.
Really bad.
Also, I don't think black market organ harvesters give a crap about sterility.
Alot of wrists were still tied from what I could see.
My question is if they are harvesting organs for the elite or whomever... wouldn't the sterility matter? You wouldn't want to buy a damaged or infected organ would you? Yet those conditions almost preclude it if not outright would do so
Maybe they're finished with organ harvesting and don't care about the dead corpse.
Fair point
I think it looked real. The people all look different and there's so much gore. If so, they probably removed the organs in a sterile surgery setting, and then just tossed the corpses.
I wonder where this is, and what language they're speaking.
Looks oddly fake. Perhaps not organ harvest in process, but post-harvest of already dead people? Organs would e shit in that non sterile, dead condition. I don’t see any organ containers or coolers. No ice anywhere. Way to clean video, can’t imagine they would let someone walk around and film that. Could be post-terrorist attack video?
why am i not disturbed by this? wtf!?
Because you know what horrible things humans are capable of. This is just another one thing
u/Deaf_MAGA_Pede what is up with all the tyrants will the sign language interpreters? arent captions good enough?
Good question!
In the event of an emergency, there would be an sign language interpreter like the ones you have seen so far, to interpret for the person presiding/speaking. The reason for this is because sometimes the captioning isn't up to par or it would not be readily available at the time of the presentation.
Also captions is not always reliable. I do not know about you but if you've been in the same areas I have such as Chicago, NY, Ohio, Georgia, etc, you would have saw what I have seen thus far; all local news have bad captioning. It isn't concurrent with the dialogue (~15-30 seconds delay) or it would just stop working completely, hence the use of a sign language interpreter. That is one of the many reasons why I don't watch the local news because 75% of the time I have no idea what is being said.
There are also deaf people who went through poor education systems and were raised relying solely on sign language over reading comprehension so when they read a sentence, they would often not understand what is being said. They would prefer the sentence being signed out to them so they can understand.
If they read something like,
they will only understand "President Trump, people, ship, out" and the rest is "foreign" to them. So the interpreter would take that sentence and change it into sign language, which would say,
Finally, yes I am quite aware that with Bidet being the "man in pseudocharge", we're seeing a rise in the use of sign language interpreters. I saw this occurring during the "pandemic" and because it was a "pandemic", I didn't think much of it since it was more of an emergency like I mentioned earlier in this post. But as the days, weeks and months went by, I'm still seeing them sticking around then with Bidet "winning", they're still there so yeah this is obviously virtue signaling to win the deaf community into supporting Bidet.
I can count how many deaf people I know, support President Trump on one hand but don't know how many of my friends who support Bidet as there are a lot of them.
Hope that answered your question! If anything else, let me know!
Thank you for the explanation. I keep thinking "is the person running this tyranny deaf?"
I've heard that the deaf community is mostly far left.
Yes unfortunately that's true because they weren't educated to do independent research and were conditioned to believe the hearing people who "raised" them. If they told the deaf people to jump off a bridge, they would.
That's understandable. Once again thank you for your time.