Just doing my due diligence on the shooting in Brooklyn Center (about 10 miles from Murderapolis or GF scene). The timing of this is obviously insane, given that closing arguments are Monday, the DC trial is heating up, tensions are high in the Twin Cities.
Other questions I have: At 29 seconds in to this video, the supposed gun shot goes. You can truly hardly hear it. It almost looks like she makes sure it's loaded before drawing it. There is no recoil. The man doesn't scream, he immediately drives away less than a second later. Then she says "Holy Shit! I shot him." as if the other officers didn't realize? Are they standing there in disbelief, or are they forgetting they should probably follow the guy they shot/pulled over?
Help me dissect it. Why would this be staged or planned? To get the national guard into the streets? The decision on the DC trial could come next week, depending on deliberations. Unrest is imminent.
It's fake...no gunshot, slide didn't cycle, no muzzle flash. She screams "TAZER TAZER TAZER", he drives off and she says "oh shit, I shot him." Shittiest acting and production I've seen yet in the recent false flags...
Isn't it just obvious? The timing, the story, everything about it screams FF. Also the victims mom was out talking with the media basically immediately after it happens? sure
This was done so poorly, I think it was on purpose. I feel like this is one you could show the video to a grocery store cashier in any town and they would say "damn, you're right...that is fake." Maybe easing the masses into reality before exposing them to harsher truth like Ashli Babbitt & George Floyd being fake too...
Frame rate. You're looking at a video of a video re-encoded by whatever sites it was uploaded to. If there was only one frame in the original video captured and the second video didn't capture that one frame then you don't have a flash or cycle. I did hear the shot.
Can you provide a video where you hear the shot
The same one you linked. Microphones do not capture what a gun actually sounds like up close. Microphones also don't capture sounds from speakers all that well either. Especially cheap microphones from cheap speakers. What you're looking at is probably evidence that is only viewable to certain people such as the press. Somebody likely smuggled in a small camera like an Ink Pen Camera to record it.
And what are the other cops doing? Looked like the one that had him initially was getting out of the way. He certainly wasn't trying to stop him in earnest. The one on the other side looked like he was wondering if it was time for a donut break after that take.
A good movie needs good actors. This has no good actors. Lets remove this scene from the final cut. Its just too far fetched. Give me something more believable, like aliens, or flat earth.
If you watch on youtube (I know, YT sucks), you can slow it down to .25 wherein, not only does there appear to be no muzzle flash, shell casing, or kickback, but when she pulls her hand back, her finger isn't even on the trigger. She also appears to tap him on the shoulder after this, quickly holsters her gun, and then pushes the car along as it speeds forward. The video gets a bit blurry at points, so plenty of people will dispute the claims. However, if the gun had gone off during the portion where it gets blurry, the result would have been utter chaos as there were two cops reaching into the car at that point.
So many question marks. The hardest part I have with these is understanding why they happen, who is behind them, and how many people have to get involved. The family, cops, Hennepin county medical examiners, you name it. All actors?
Not necessarily, with the media as the gatekeepers of the official narrative, they merely have to report that the medical examiner said "x, y, or z". Do we even have proof that the driver got into an accident after he got "shot"? They released a video with 3 cops and 2 people in the car. That's 5 actors max needed at this point. We've also got a police chief and a mayor involved, which brings it to 7 non-media (if we assume the media isn't using their own to film and push the story) people to create the original story.
People believe the original story and react and suddenly you've got a riot based on a fake event, but since the riot is real and much larger than the event itself, people aren't as likely to scrutinize the event.
Of course, that's just one possibility. It is also possible that they hired people to push the riots as well. There isn't a whole lot that would surprise me these days.
I observed the same, no sound of a gunshot (that was my very first impression), no muzzle flash and the action of the other officers; just left me scratching my head. Thanks for saying out loud what was going through my mind.
Its more than unrest they are rioting and chasing down any white person on the street or in cars and beating the living shit out of them. All of these morons need to be behind bars for life.
Where are they doing that at?
I think he’s referencing a 4-5 year old video someone reposted on patriots.win. Not that it makes it right, but we want to keep things accurate. Another way of looking at it is that they’ve been rioting and making it racial since before Trump even made his first executive order, and before Q made a single drop. And yet they’ll blame every riot from here on out on them.
Yep, looks very very very FF ,way too many why they do that ???what kind of gun was shot ?i did not hear one, The whole deer in the headlights looks from the 3 yes 3 officers standing there looking at each other .... Is it great to see America back yet?