Indicate means points to. NOT having a picture of something does not point to anything at all. You can't point to something with a finger you don't have.
i've been diggin that hole for a while, love the item in general, and there are so many hidden things and voices / stories around, that, linked with a parallel dig i was doing on Tesla and magnetism, plus ancient text i've been reading from Hermetism (tree of life, kabbalah, and many more, think that in some eastern philosophies is said that the ying yang to be a representation of the earth) led me to think that likely, the earth is a kind of toroid
Too many secrets and unexplained goings on. And no-one is allowed to go near it unless authorised. Read an article about the impossibility of getting permission to go there, it was quite a read. Made me go hmmm.
How does the flat model even explain this? It does not.
And yep, this is the arctic and not the antarctic. Maybe it is because the antarctic is incredibly cold and hardly anyone besides a few dozen scientists live there?
These are irrelevant 1-5 instructions? Lmao pathetic, nonsensical. Long range sniping does not include anything about accounting for curvature, in fact I have the USMC official manual for it no mentions.
Long range sniping isn't very long range in the sense of earth curvature. Even in naval artillery (typical engagement well below 10k yards) the deviations are minimal.
However, if you were to read and understand manuals for operating naval batteries (note: Reading proficiency is key here!), you would see there is a correction to account for curvature, by reducing elevation angle as a function of target range.
I can copy paste also as you. 5g technology has nothing to do with this subject.. Neither does ICBM. I'm not trying to nefariously divert anybody's attention from any subject, unlike yourself
Balloons are technically and legally satellites. Anything that flies or intends to fly over 35,000ft. NASA has balloons that can stay in the air for a year, so what?
How is you not having pictures of something proof that the world is flat?
Indicate means points to. NOT having a picture of something does not point to anything at all. You can't point to something with a finger you don't have.
Understanding the definition of words is key...
So if I explain to you why someone wouldn't give you a picture that would be proof the earth is round?
This conversation is making me feel like I am on drugs.
It indicates*
Antarctica is a mystery, I am eager to see the truth revealed.
i've been diggin that hole for a while, love the item in general, and there are so many hidden things and voices / stories around, that, linked with a parallel dig i was doing on Tesla and magnetism, plus ancient text i've been reading from Hermetism (tree of life, kabbalah, and many more, think that in some eastern philosophies is said that the ying yang to be a representation of the earth) led me to think that likely, the earth is a kind of toroid
Too many secrets and unexplained goings on. And no-one is allowed to go near it unless authorised. Read an article about the impossibility of getting permission to go there, it was quite a read. Made me go hmmm.
Are you that much retarded?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl6DbRoX9X4
How does the flat model even explain this? It does not.
And yep, this is the arctic and not the antarctic. Maybe it is because the antarctic is incredibly cold and hardly anyone besides a few dozen scientists live there?
These are irrelevant 1-5 instructions? Lmao pathetic, nonsensical. Long range sniping does not include anything about accounting for curvature, in fact I have the USMC official manual for it no mentions.
Long range sniping isn't very long range in the sense of earth curvature. Even in naval artillery (typical engagement well below 10k yards) the deviations are minimal.
However, if you were to read and understand manuals for operating naval batteries (note: Reading proficiency is key here!), you would see there is a correction to account for curvature, by reducing elevation angle as a function of target range.
Ah, so you cite "manuals" I should read, but give no specifics/actually never cite anything. Ok?
I can copy paste also as you. 5g technology has nothing to do with this subject.. Neither does ICBM. I'm not trying to nefariously divert anybody's attention from any subject, unlike yourself
Is that all you have to say?
What is this cartoon? Really that's the best you have for this argument? Sad..
Balloons are technically and legally satellites. Anything that flies or intends to fly over 35,000ft. NASA has balloons that can stay in the air for a year, so what?
Nice cartoon image as your proof? Pathetic. Actually sad.