Big Pharma and the deep state media are hiding a Covid cure/treatment from all of us! Please copy and spread wide! The copy/paste from the site doesn't transfer well. This site is awesome and worth your time to review the data!
•98% of the 52 studies to date report positive effects (25 statistically significant in isolation). Random effects meta-analysis for early treatment and pooled effects shows an 81% reduction, RR 0.19 [0.09-0.38], and prophylactic use shows 85% improvement, RR 0.15 [0.09-0.25]. Mortality results show 76% lower mortality, RR 0.24 [0.14-0.42] for all treatment delays, and 84% lower, RR 0.16 [0.04-0.63] for early treatment.
•96% of the 27 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) report positive effects, with an estimated 65% improvement, RR 0.35 [0.24-0.52].
•The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 52 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 85 trillion (p = 0.000000000000012).
•All data to reproduce this paper and the sources are in the appendix. See [Bryant, Hill, Kory, Lawrie, Nardelli] for other meta analyses, all with similar results confirming effectiveness.
But what I find most interesting is if you go to the end of the study there's a section entitled "Conflict of Interest Disclosures". Look at how this and most studies are funded. The investigators are all in the pocket of big pharma.
"Dr López-Medina reported receiving grants from Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen and personal fees from Sanofi Pasteur during the conduct of the study. Dr López reported receiving grants from Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen and personal fees from Sanofi Pasteur during the conduct of the study. Dr Oñate reported receiving grants from Janssen and personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Gilead outside the submitted work."
This is why all these supposed studies showing hydroxy-chloroquine and Ivermectin having no beneficial effect are suspect. Big pharma scratch each others backs. Just like corporate boards of directors sit on each others boards and approve the outlandishly high salaries of company execs. It's a big circle jerk where patients get screwed with costly drugs because "studies show" that the cheap therapeutics don't work. Well, they do work. The whole damn Covid vaccination push is nothing but a scam.
Can we not call them "COVID sceptics"? That makes it sound as though they're skeptical that the virus exists and besides, this really has nothing to do with skepticism.
These are just people who are able to think critically and recognize that the actions taken by multiple governments do not align with the actual level of risk, and that those actions have become tyrannical in a transparent attempt to use this virus as a means of consolidating even more power.
So instead of "COVID sceptics", I vote for calling these people "critical thinkers", "smart people" or "People who have not allowed irrational fear to unplug their brains".
Define 'success'.... Our parliament (and I would guess most which follow the same system) are rotten to the core- cronyism and old boys school favours (bloody spellcheck me. Fine. Favors). We are very much still in a serfdom.
Big Pharma and the deep state media are hiding a Covid cure/treatment from all of us! Please copy and spread wide! The copy/paste from the site doesn't transfer well. This site is awesome and worth your time to review the data!
https://ivmmeta.com/
•98% of the 52 studies to date report positive effects (25 statistically significant in isolation). Random effects meta-analysis for early treatment and pooled effects shows an 81% reduction, RR 0.19 [0.09-0.38], and prophylactic use shows 85% improvement, RR 0.15 [0.09-0.25]. Mortality results show 76% lower mortality, RR 0.24 [0.14-0.42] for all treatment delays, and 84% lower, RR 0.16 [0.04-0.63] for early treatment.
•96% of the 27 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) report positive effects, with an estimated 65% improvement, RR 0.35 [0.24-0.52].
•The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 52 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 85 trillion (p = 0.000000000000012).
•All data to reproduce this paper and the sources are in the appendix. See [Bryant, Hill, Kory, Lawrie, Nardelli] for other meta analyses, all with similar results confirming effectiveness.
Thwy are probably hiding a cure for everything. Im praying for the medical golden ages when this is all said and done
Wonderful to watch, bless them all!
And the vax believers would counter with this, a study published in JAMA showing no statistical difference in outcome whether Ivermectin was used or a placebo. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2777389?guestAccessKey=2e7b1bca-36d4-494d-9683-740c499e8d0f&utm_source=silverchair&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=article_alert-jama&utm_term=mostread&utm_content=olf-widget_04192021
But what I find most interesting is if you go to the end of the study there's a section entitled "Conflict of Interest Disclosures". Look at how this and most studies are funded. The investigators are all in the pocket of big pharma.
"Dr López-Medina reported receiving grants from Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen and personal fees from Sanofi Pasteur during the conduct of the study. Dr López reported receiving grants from Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen and personal fees from Sanofi Pasteur during the conduct of the study. Dr Oñate reported receiving grants from Janssen and personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Gilead outside the submitted work."
This is why all these supposed studies showing hydroxy-chloroquine and Ivermectin having no beneficial effect are suspect. Big pharma scratch each others backs. Just like corporate boards of directors sit on each others boards and approve the outlandishly high salaries of company execs. It's a big circle jerk where patients get screwed with costly drugs because "studies show" that the cheap therapeutics don't work. Well, they do work. The whole damn Covid vaccination push is nothing but a scam.
Can we not call them "COVID sceptics"? That makes it sound as though they're skeptical that the virus exists and besides, this really has nothing to do with skepticism.
These are just people who are able to think critically and recognize that the actions taken by multiple governments do not align with the actual level of risk, and that those actions have become tyrannical in a transparent attempt to use this virus as a means of consolidating even more power.
So instead of "COVID sceptics", I vote for calling these people "critical thinkers", "smart people" or "People who have not allowed irrational fear to unplug their brains".
I used the video title in the post title but it all works for me
Go on you beautiful limies!
That crowd at the end honestly made me cry.
The world is waking up.
Thank you so much for sharing
The crowds size can be seen around 2:54:00 It just keeps coming. Good job Brits!
They did break the monarcy and bring about the most successful and copied means of governing, the parliamentary system.
Define 'success'.... Our parliament (and I would guess most which follow the same system) are rotten to the core- cronyism and old boys school favours (bloody spellcheck me. Fine. Favors). We are very much still in a serfdom.