If the watermark thing is true, then was Krebs a good guy?
He repeatedly claimed the election was the most secure. He one of the experts used to dismiss the fraud allegations.
Was it a trap?
To get all the rethoric on the fraud out there, to have Krebs confirmed as the authority on the matter, and then make the audits happen?
FYI: Just a few things to note about Krebs.
**Just a cursory search as a 'jumping off point'. I think this is all we need to know if Krebs is a white hat or black hat. And we all know Admiral Rogers is a patriot white hat. Kreb's partner Stamos is the smoking gun, so to speak. However, Use your own discernment...
YES i was just thinking about this its potentially a huge curveball... He says we had the most secure election in history (knowing about the watermarks)... the Dems all laud him as a hero for saying this and the republicans are pissed. I heard soooo many dems cite Christopher Krebs saying it was the most secure election. Now 6 months down the line we find out (possibly?) he was referring to the water marks and was actually spot on, right in time for the AZ audit to use watermarks to prove a ton of fraud.
Gosh I hope so!
I was thinking if it was the UV reactive specs weaved into the paper, that would be obvious if it’s a whole ballot but also pretty obvious if you have a lot of already shredded ballots, just hold the shreds in UV and see if they’re reactive.
I sure hope this is how we bring all the damn cheating to light.
Krebs is comp'd, I am quite certain of that. He put out a statement back in November/December when this 'watermark' matter surfaced and he dismissed it as ludicrous.
That could be the point though. Establish him as an authority among the left, saying that the elections were the most secure. Get everyone to trust him, cite him, etc. Then all of a sudden, you reveal the fraud via watermarks and Krebs goes "See? The most secure election."
Not holding my breath hahaha
How do we know they are officially checking for watermarks? Is there somewhere where it explains each stations responsibility? That’s the part I don’t understand they have went out of their way to make this transparent but I have yet to see a break down of stations and color meaning
I’ve only heard Jovan talk about analyzing the paper. Nothing from him about watermarks
I agree - I am not seeing any basis in fact for this 'watermark' probe. This is the kind of thing that can make this site look stupid and CTish by not sourcing it properly.
The colors and cameras are to make it easy to tell who belongs where and to restrict the movement of ballots.
Yeah it could be nothing. Well see
I did research on him yesterday and he seemed like the deep state, Biden is hiring him as vp of the same job he had under trump.. Probably not good
I always suspected him of being our guy but I also believe he could have been an unwitting white pawn in the 4d game.
Krebs is a crook. The only question is whether or not the white hats knew that before he was appointed to lead the newly created CISA. Either he snuck into that position and deliberately torpedoed efforts to safeguard elections, or else he was appointed to the position because the white hats knew he would try sabotage election security measures, and he was/is a primary target of a sting operation.