These People also always say it is false because there in no evidence. That does not make something false. For it to be false you need evidence to the contrary, and irrefutable evidence. otherwise it is simply unverified. If I said a bear ate a fish in the colorado river this morning it is not false because there is no evidence that this happened, it is simply unverified.
"False. There is no evidence that any mass shootings were planned or staged by Democrats.
This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. "
? There is no evidence that there were any hens in the henhouse. This article was produced by a very fat fox.
Yea - I think the article is correct.
The FF trend is not caused by the Democratic Party. That would imply that Romney, Cheney and the Bushes are not involved as well.
Bingo, it's always CIA/FBI
These People also always say it is false because there in no evidence. That does not make something false. For it to be false you need evidence to the contrary, and irrefutable evidence. otherwise it is simply unverified. If I said a bear ate a fish in the colorado river this morning it is not false because there is no evidence that this happened, it is simply unverified.
Tell them to list the official motive for the most deadly mass shooting in US history- the Las Vegas massacre. Ask them if it was a false flag or not.
These leftist fact checks only serve as a confirmation of the events.
lol.. reuters doing fact checking!!! rofl!!!
OP, off topic, but I respect your abilities. Can you check this out and give feed back? Thanks https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNLP2wqL/the-big-pentagon-internet-myster/c/
Hah. Here's an opportunity. I actually clicked on the link to learn about the Reuters fact checkers. And read this (how do you do the fancy quotes?):
"Reuters is a signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). The IFCN has a Code of Principles (https://www.ifcncodeofprinciples.poynter.org/know-more/the-commitments-of-the-code-of-principles). Readers of our fact-checks are invited to contact the IFCN if for any reason they feel Reuters Fact Check has acted in breach of this Code."
So what does the Code of Principles say? I need to bug out as I'm cramming for a job interview!
Definition of circular logic - when the left fact-check the left.