MIC...I think thats it. "The Machine Identification Code can be made visible by printing or copying a page and subsequently scanning a small section with a high-resolution scanner. The yellow color channel can then be enhanced with an image processing program, to make any dots of the MIC clearly visible. Under good lighting conditions, a magnifying glass may be enough to see the pattern. Under UV-light the yellow dots are clearly recognizable.[14]"
The UV lights seen at the audit inspection stations could serve the following purposes: 1) Sterilizing ballots; 2) look for organic fluids; 3) search for thumbprints or 4) look for a UV watermark.
Doesn't seem like # 1 or 3 are likely or even #2. The ballots have been handled without gloves and they don't appear to scan every ballot, nor do they appear to be separating ballots after the scanning occurs. There is something that can only be confirmed by UV light. The obvious answer is a watermark but I'm open to other explanations that fit what we are witnessing. Has anyone seen a "discard" box/pile that would indicate they are separating some ballots after the scan? I'm just wondering if the non-conforming ballots are being removed from the count? Seems like this would be the first step in the process before the counting, not the last?
Yes Ballots are being separated into smaller boxes and put behind fences. In this video https://streamable.com/m5oiz8 they have a box separated they just finished working on, they call over an official and you see the official do a visible fist pump of excitement and then doubles it into a double fist pump of excitement. Fraud Vitiates Everything, They don't need millions of fraudulent votes, they just need to find proof of interference which will lead to the collapse.
did you notice that the ballots being scanned, were all unfolded?
might have been pressed flat in those boxes and stacked up with the weight taking out the folds or they were never folded.
also there was only one stack for the processed papers, not 2, one for pass and a second for fail. so this is a type of verification of an earlier decision, up the line.
which suggests to me that this team were not tallying the votes, but auditing a specific item, eg folds, and security marks.
From what I've gleaned, each station is performing a specific audit function - ink, crease, watermark, etc. I believe Jovan Pulitzer designed the audit methodology for Cyber Ninjas.
Said? Nothing officially, but I personally saw them via the feed scanning ballots with UV lights. UV lights are also used to show watermarks on most paper money.
Azaudit.org is the live feed of the Arizona audit. Camera number 6 shows the forensic tables and they are using a special light that looks like it will reveal watermark.
Look at this please and I think you will understand the technology that they probably used to create digital watermarks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_Identification_Code
MIC...I think thats it. "The Machine Identification Code can be made visible by printing or copying a page and subsequently scanning a small section with a high-resolution scanner. The yellow color channel can then be enhanced with an image processing program, to make any dots of the MIC clearly visible. Under good lighting conditions, a magnifying glass may be enough to see the pattern. Under UV-light the yellow dots are clearly recognizable.[14]"
The UV lights seen at the audit inspection stations could serve the following purposes: 1) Sterilizing ballots; 2) look for organic fluids; 3) search for thumbprints or 4) look for a UV watermark.
Doesn't seem like # 1 or 3 are likely or even #2. The ballots have been handled without gloves and they don't appear to scan every ballot, nor do they appear to be separating ballots after the scanning occurs. There is something that can only be confirmed by UV light. The obvious answer is a watermark but I'm open to other explanations that fit what we are witnessing. Has anyone seen a "discard" box/pile that would indicate they are separating some ballots after the scan? I'm just wondering if the non-conforming ballots are being removed from the count? Seems like this would be the first step in the process before the counting, not the last?
Yes Ballots are being separated into smaller boxes and put behind fences. In this video https://streamable.com/m5oiz8 they have a box separated they just finished working on, they call over an official and you see the official do a visible fist pump of excitement and then doubles it into a double fist pump of excitement. Fraud Vitiates Everything, They don't need millions of fraudulent votes, they just need to find proof of interference which will lead to the collapse.
they seem to be sorting the fakes from the real ones before the tally.
I mean the feds already know how to do it with currency.
did you notice that the ballots being scanned, were all unfolded? might have been pressed flat in those boxes and stacked up with the weight taking out the folds or they were never folded.
also there was only one stack for the processed papers, not 2, one for pass and a second for fail. so this is a type of verification of an earlier decision, up the line.
which suggests to me that this team were not tallying the votes, but auditing a specific item, eg folds, and security marks.
From what I've gleaned, each station is performing a specific audit function - ink, crease, watermark, etc. I believe Jovan Pulitzer designed the audit methodology for Cyber Ninjas.
Just gonna leave this here about the watermarks https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/mail-in-voting-election-integrity-safeguards_508.pdf read the bottom. Jovan was on video discussing what they're looking for here https://www.bitchute.com/video/0NgmivExk427/ (start at 5:59 and let it run for 45-50 seconds, it should play the video that displays the QR blocks under a forensic microscope.)
Arizona audit
What has been said about watermarks and the audit?
Said? Nothing officially, but I personally saw them via the feed scanning ballots with UV lights. UV lights are also used to show watermarks on most paper money.
Well, I don't see why it wouldn't be UV marks. The technology certainly exists https://www.elecmatics.com/our-products/training-kit/ballot-paper-tk/ballot-paper/
What does Alex Jones have to say about this?
Azaudit.org is the live feed of the Arizona audit. Camera number 6 shows the forensic tables and they are using a special light that looks like it will reveal watermark.
Pure speculation at this point, but it's damn good speculation. ?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/big-news-az-official-confirms-ultra-violet-method-currently-used-identify-creases-watermarks-ballots-video/