Is it that Q quoted and responded to the anon? Or was it a one-sided interaction, from the anon. The format isn’t very clear who is saying what.
It seems like my other post got removed. I’m not sure how the follow-up “context” to the Q drop adds anything. The anon’s response being considered “context” is rather odd.
Just give me Q. Not the dippy responses. They subtract from the message.
Q Post 997
Reuters archive
Cool! Thanks fren. ?
999 has an interesting inversion. Satanists sure love their inversions don't they? Just a coincidence?
Pretty antisemitic
I know a lot of Q/MAGA folks are either zionists or anti-semites, but the idea of Q quoting any anti semetic language only hurts the movement.
But then again, they are the movement so what do I know
"Antisemitism" is a Khazarian invention to mitigate against criticism after hijacking the Jewish religion.
They aren't Khazars. They are Jews. Ashkenazi. Rothschild isn't a Khazar. The Khazar story is a psyop.
ADL??? GTFO with that political correctness communist crap
"anti-semitic" is more fake bullshit to protect the bankers, deep state, globalists, etc from criticism
same way BLM is a actually a marxist organization that uses peoples fear of being called racist to protect them from criticism
let's stop biting on their bullshit.
Is it that Q quoted and responded to the anon? Or was it a one-sided interaction, from the anon. The format isn’t very clear who is saying what.
It seems like my other post got removed. I’m not sure how the follow-up “context” to the Q drop adds anything. The anon’s response being considered “context” is rather odd.
Just give me Q. Not the dippy responses. They subtract from the message.
For the record I am neither . . .
Prosemite antizionist isn't a rare opinion at all.
Upvote for tasty, tasty sauce.