I picked about ten of these links at random and none of them are about 5G at all. While it is useful to look at the effects of continuous signals and their interactions with biology, each technology is different, with different uses and different overall effects. It should have been titled differently, or the links restricted to 5G.
It would be really helpful if you could change all those "/save/" to "/web/". Save is an action that can only be done ten times in a day. "web" is the url that goes to an already saved version.
Is a study in the effects of phone USAGE (how much time did someone receive and send messages and read, play games etc.) and no study was done about the effect of EM.
If you want anyone to look into 5G, send them only relevant studies, because they will dismiss all of it just based on looking at one publication alone.
I was talking to a special kind of normie on damn tiktok that was saying we are a danger to society because we do not wear masks and not getting vaccinated and said we needed "vaccine passports."
Because the title says these sources are about the negative effects of 5g. Posting sources that do not directly support your claim lowers your credibility.
Where did I say anything about normies? I said your credibility suffers when you post sources that don't support your claim. I randomly clicked around on your links 3 times and got a few things: A study about low frequency (not 5G), a study about living near power lines (not 5G), and a study that concluded that the risk of ALS could not be determined, and then continue to provide its opinion that 5G has not been shown to cause other health problems.
Maybe 5G is risky, but you aren't demonstrating that. I'm trying to help you clean up so that you can have some credibility about this, but you're being hysterical... kind of like a golem when they hear truth they don't want to accept.
Once you get the airlocked silver platter argument down, you meet the end of level boss "I don't care/it doesn't bother/affect me"
Beat that boss and you will need a comprehensive and flawless plan for every variation of human, in all locations, to live in pain free bliss for the next century without using money or any interventions whatsoever... (You win that by flipping the script and saying "it's up to you, free human") There may be other levels.
saved, ty
I picked about ten of these links at random and none of them are about 5G at all. While it is useful to look at the effects of continuous signals and their interactions with biology, each technology is different, with different uses and different overall effects. It should have been titled differently, or the links restricted to 5G.
Are there any links to 5G technology tests?
Thank you
It would be really helpful if you could change all those "/save/" to "/web/". Save is an action that can only be done ten times in a day. "web" is the url that goes to an already saved version.
I'm going through them all. It is very useful.
However, the first link is a publication about extremely low EMF (0-3000 Hz) and not 5G (which is extremely high frequency...).
https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042390/pdf/1471-2458-11-66.pdf
Is a study in the effects of phone USAGE (how much time did someone receive and send messages and read, play games etc.) and no study was done about the effect of EM.
If you want anyone to look into 5G, send them only relevant studies, because they will dismiss all of it just based on looking at one publication alone.
I was talking to a special kind of normie on damn tiktok that was saying we are a danger to society because we do not wear masks and not getting vaccinated and said we needed "vaccine passports."
SMFH...
Because the title says these sources are about the negative effects of 5g. Posting sources that do not directly support your claim lowers your credibility.
So you're a liar? It's clear you didn't check my post history.
Where did I say anything about normies? I said your credibility suffers when you post sources that don't support your claim. I randomly clicked around on your links 3 times and got a few things: A study about low frequency (not 5G), a study about living near power lines (not 5G), and a study that concluded that the risk of ALS could not be determined, and then continue to provide its opinion that 5G has not been shown to cause other health problems.
Maybe 5G is risky, but you aren't demonstrating that. I'm trying to help you clean up so that you can have some credibility about this, but you're being hysterical... kind of like a golem when they hear truth they don't want to accept.
Okay. I randomly chose the second from last one. It's also not about 5G. How many times do I have to click before you get it?
Once you get the airlocked silver platter argument down, you meet the end of level boss "I don't care/it doesn't bother/affect me"
Beat that boss and you will need a comprehensive and flawless plan for every variation of human, in all locations, to live in pain free bliss for the next century without using money or any interventions whatsoever... (You win that by flipping the script and saying "it's up to you, free human") There may be other levels.