So I've made the decision that I am not touching any of the experimental vaccines for medical reasons. However, there is an option that uses the same technology as your traditional flu shot, the Valneva inactivated shot, which won't be available probably until the end of the year.
I'd love to know what people's thoughts are on this. Again, very much aware that Q's are vax leery, but curious to hear why you all think.
99% recovery rate.
Effective treatments exist.
exactly my thoughts, along with I trust the immune system God gave me
wtf is wrong with people that they want a jab so bad???
For the all the glowies and smooth brained sheep lurkers who scan this place for stuff to rabble about on twitter and reddit.
No, we're not anti-vaxxers. No, what you're injecting with your body isn't a vaccine, it's more like a computer virus that will unknowingly rewrite your genetic code.
Vaccines are made with weakened strains or pieces of the antigen (virus), which trigger your immune alert system to have antibodies always at the ready should you be infected with the real deal.
Actual covid vaccines in the market using this model are the indian Covax, the chinese Coronavac (at least they say it is, I wouldn't touch it with a three foot pole), and the J&J Jansen one.
Unlike what's claimed around there, we encourage personal responsibility and research, so that's what I'll say to OP. Have a look, see what the thing's made of, check for possible side effects. In the end, it's all up to you.
DON'T
Explain why? This is essentially a flu shot. There's no nefarious NWO Bill Gates bullshit going on in this, unless you think that there's a vast conspiracy behind the polio vaccine and flu shots.
"Father of Inoculations" Jonas Salk Survival of the Wisest
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Uhp9d3A2Tz13/
Essential to understanding the Technocratic, Eugenicist, directed Plandemic. Part 2 of Survival of the Wisest. In this one, we go page by page and give a presuppositional critique of Salk's world view and his proposals for humanity. Why does he want to reduce the population, alter your dna/rna, and believes you need to be micromanaged.
20 THINGS YOU DON’T KNOW ABOUT POLIO https://tapnewswire.com/2021/03/20-things-you-dont-know-about-polio/
Fascinating read.
You mean the polio vax that infected everyone with SV-40, responsible for soft-tissue cancers we see exploding today? Vaccines have never been safe nor effective. We are all infected with crap from them. http://www.sv40.org/
Telling people that it's basically the flu shot and expecting them to think it's okay then is hilarious. Why would you get a vaccine for the flu? Report back to your masters that we're a lost cause, we won't take any vaccine for a disease that isn't dangerous.
do you know how they come up with the flu shot every year? it's based on a prediction of how it will mutate. did you know that they were way wrong with the 2019/2020 prediction? my guess is they've been way wrong on that mutation prediction for years. and if you've ever wondered why some people who test positive for "covid" have no symptoms and some end up hospitalized on respirators, maybe it has something to do with being vaccinated for the wrong disease year after year after year, while those of us who have never had a flu shot and have survived the flu every year since 1968 are doing just fine. i'm not sure why people are so damn trusting of this system when it's proven over and over again that it doesn't care about your health. but the hard to swallow pill is that the pharmaceutical industry doesn't get rich off of making you well.
With hydroxy-chloroquine and Ivermectin showing promising results similar to Tamiflu in reducing the severity of Covid and keeping it from advancing to the stage of needing hospitalization when taken early, I don't know if a vaccine is even required. But, I would certainly consider a more traditionally manufactured vaccine if it is safe and effective over the mRNA variety. We will not know the full ramifications of mRMA for another 3-5 years.
Get both. I keep chlorine dioxide and black mica around as well. The Ivermectin you can get at Tractor Supply and others that sell to farmers/ranchers. It's main function won't be fighting cov however. What it really does well is is fight the vax. It is "anti-parasitic". The spike proteins shed by the vaxed can't survive any exposure to it. I think it should be taken by everyone who got the pcr test. The "mystery swab" released darpa designed a hydrogel to the blood brain barrier containing a parasite that attacks the pineal gland. Ivermectin eliminates that parasite as well.
And unfortunately on half of our US adult population. Stop there and leave the children to survive on their own.
Flu shots are not without side effects. Your immune system is lowered for up to 3 months, making you more susceptible to illness.
Only idiots get the flu vaccine.
Why take any vaccine when there are preventatives out there (hydrochloroquine-used effectively for malaria for years, vitamin D, Zinc, Ivermectin, budesomide inhaler-used for asthmatics, Vitamin C), good diet, good hand washing. All of these are preventatives for Covid 29 which has a 99.3% survival rate.
Get some Ivermectin... it takes 10 yrs to safely develop a vaccine
Some really good information: Monday: Professor Risch https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/ingraham-left-doesnt-want-to-debate-they-want-to-dominate
Tuesday: Dr. Alexander https://rumble.com/vgj2un-paul-alexander-on-laura-ingraham.html
Wednesday: Dr. McCullough https://rumble.com/vgl5gr-peter-mccullough-on-laura-ingraham-may-5-2021.html
99.6% survivable.
So, the name says it plainly... when do you need this: NEVA!
Take it from someone who had covid: you will survive it. It's like getting through a seasonal flu, or a bad cold. Just rest for about 8 days and you'll be fine. Unless you're 102 years old, or you're morbidly obese, you aren't going to die from it.
From what I'm seeing in your link, it sounds like it's based on typical vaccine technology. Without digging into it more, I would say that once more testing is done and we know that it's actually effective (the flu vaccine is only about 40% effective on average, so some years only 10%) it might not be a bad idea for people who are at greater risk of dying from Covid. Unless someone is elderly, a smoker, very overweight, etc I don't see a reason to get any vaccine for covid, even if it's 99% effective. Every vaccine will have side effects and you have to weight the risk of side effects against the risk of side effects of catching the disease.
Spending time collecting articles I find myself no longer capable of trusting the medical cartel in any way shape of form.
“WHO is a front for these depopulation interests.” July 9 2007: “Jon Rappoport interview of ex vaccine researcher” https://archive.vn/o7u59
Feb 5, 2010: “Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic” https://archive.vn/ck4Yp
Updated compilation pdf Vaccine Articles in Chronological Order: April 26 2021 https://files.catbox.moe/bc2qqw.pdf
I would need more data, but to be honest i would trust this more than the current vaccines. I like how they highlight the UK’s vaccine/immunology body don’t recommend pregnant women getting the current vaccines available. I also like how they describe this as your more traditional vaccine and not this new tech which no one really knows the long term effects of.
^^^ THIS!!