Isn't it strange, after 2 week or more of this, none of TGP or OANN has covered this yet. Has any journalist professional or medical professional investigated this (first hand, with samples, not merely looking at vids)?
After 2 weeks, has Steve Bannon weighed in? After 2 weeks, has Alex Jones weighed in? Not even him? You'd think some of these big shots would have checked the story and ran it by now, and it would be posted here breathlessly. Wouldn't all these victims be running off to report to some journalists by now? Someone tell them!
Y'know, I will still gawk by the sidelines on this.
So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous ultraviolet light or very powerful light, ... supposing you brought the light inside the body ... and then I see the disinfectant, when it knocks it out in a minute ...
When the cancerous cells are identified, they can be targeted by an electromagnetic field or light, which would heat the cells and subsequently cause death.
Trump was talking about UV, a whole other different thing, nothing to do with introduced any particles. It's just UV light (and there are at least 3 UV light range class, and common UV LEDs are not very effective at disinfecting -- not the ideal UV light type).
UV and chlorine were therapies that some countries were trying out at that time, particularly some South American ones. Their focus is the nose and throat area, which is likely the weak point were flu virus enter. I think there is some effect, but degrading virus particles takes time -- it may work as a preventive measure as long as the virus particles introduced is low.
Magnetoferritin won't do much with UV, and in fact you might split them up because UV is good at degrading protein-based complexes (as it is in killing virus, given enough time).
The premise is the same. Same reason the injection sights would be magnetic - iron in the body concentrates in areas of inflammation, likewise magnetoferritine concentrates in areas of inflammation - lighting up said area in turn when imaged.
UV Light generates "heat," which kills. Sunlight kills is a point Q emphasized twice.
Yes, I'm well aware of the "chlorine" therapies and the controversy along those lines - not focused on that. UV, rather. Electromagnets make sense too - ever built an induction forge in your garage?
Do you understand what I mean, when I say the concept he addressed in the press conference, may be related to this campaign trail promise, and may be related directly to the immense leaps in magnetic technology made during his administration? See for instance the dates of the numerous articles I've linked regarding magnetoferritine -
Trusting my source, I'm betting on it, big, now. I mean you can doubt, I will not attempt to change your mind and I'm not going to think of you any differently either way on what your evaluation of my understanding is here. What matters to me is I think I figured it out the mystery I've been interested in. That's what's big to me.
UV can't get very far into the skin. Sunlight won't reach much into the nose and throat tract. Or lungs, unless you can push a UV light fiber in there.
Suppose the vacc has such nanoparticles and UV in sunlight activates it. But the vacc is supposed to stay in the arm and not zip around in the bloodstream, which is why in Europe they adjusted the procedure to check for blood -- they didn't want to jab into a vein.
So it stays around the arm and say it gets UV. Then your UV or heat therapy would only be good near the injection area. But the worst-hit (or most susceptible, due to ACE2 receptors) organ is often the lungs.
Zapping nanoparticles to kill cancer cells is common research. But virus replicates inside normal cells. How to target them? Ferretin cannot magically seek virus-infected cells. It's not a smart nanobot. Targeting is an issue here.
Well, about the induction current thing, you should try to find people who can zap nanoparticles with a coil and get them hot. Coupling a coil and nanoparticles? Can you induce viable current loops in a single Fe ion? (Because when complexed with Ferretin, it's all separate single Fe ions complexed with the protein.)
If magnetoferritin is in the vaccine, then with certainty - due to the amount of inflammation in the tissue in the injection site, it would in turn bind to that area, at least temporarily. Ordinary iron does so - even sweat can cause partial magnetism, so surely a concentration of magnetoferritin.
Nah. Magnetoferritin is not what you should be worried about. If anything, it's a cool distraction from the things you should be worried about, like myocarditis from Pfizer.
Magnetoferritin is just a nanocarrier, it is safe, and essentially iron bound to proteins injected into your bloodstream.
Here's an interesting fact - Covid-19 and low serum iron - or iron deficiency - are correlated. Infected areas basically gather what little iron there is, and the condition worsens significantly when you have iron deficiency. https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/7/7/ofaa250/5860447 Magnetoferritin is simply serum iron. It's pretty useful, biomedically.
What did we have a shortage of during the 2020 Covid outbreak, and what were stores limiting purchases of?
If anything, the 'magnet conspiracy' is the manipulation of the community by bad actors that use a truth as a battering ram to make us look insane. Sort of like what Alex Jones does.
No, I'm just an investigator, I put together pieces and solve problems, and I'm pretty quick about it when the ball gets rolling. Sometimes you can see it happen right in front of you...
Hence why I have to say my comment above that you replied to originally, is incorrect. Magnetoferritin isn't a substitute for iron deficient folks, it's a tool - used to locate cancer cells, as a "light" injected inside the body, making it easy to see. See pic hot-linked in the sentence.
As I was researching tonight, I remembered something Trump was barraged with hate for - his "disinfectant" comment, where he said this:
When the cancerous cells are identified, they can be targeted by an electromagnetic field or light, which would heat the cells and subsequently cause death.
I only now realized that Trump paraphrased exactly the concept presented within that article. 'Light' in body, acquire target, destroy target with 'light.' He dumbs down his vocabulary consistently - probably went overboard enough for defenders to think "UV Light" and the moronic haters to think "lysol."
I've been obsessed with magnetics for the past month for reasons related to US Military scientist Salvatore Pais (check him out if you feel like learning about the "ufos" declassed by the Pentagon) but I had no idea that they were already mainstream biomedical items. I speculate that "magnetism" is going to be the future of medicine.
So you're saying the spike proteins in the shot draw iron to the area of the shot? So that means the videos aren't a hoax, but a real side effect? If so, why the debunking?
Am I understanding what you're suggesting correctly?
Iron is drawn to any area of inflammation really. In cases of Covid, for instance, it's drawn to infected lungs - which if you have an iron deficiency, contributes to poor health and eventually death.
Rather - magnetoferritin functions a lot like Iron, in that it likewise is drawn to areas of inflammation. To give you an excellent example, let's say you inject it into a patient with cancer, or tumors. Magnetoferritin is attracted to the infected area, and makes it easier for imaging devices to determine where the cancer is. See associated picture.
Anyway - to summarize, magnetoferritin and/or ferritin serves as a useful nanocarrier for drugs. Ferritin is guaranteed to be utilized in vaccines, and given the severity of Covid - likely a bioweapon designed by American traitors and built by their Chinese black site - maybe the intent is to determine areas damaged by Covid after the plan is complete. Or maybe something else - Q wrote plenty about cancer for example, which this shit detects.
Ultimately, I'm just an investigator. Not a medical practitioner. I started doing this research only tonight, so you're getting my best guess so far - which is that the injection sites are magnetic due to magnetoferritin which by and large, seems like a positive, useful biomedical invention.
Could there be bad risks associated with it? I don't have enough information to tell for sure.
When the cancerous cells are identified, they can be targeted by an electromagnetic field or light, which would heat the cells and subsequently cause death.
So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous ultraviolet light or very powerful light, ... supposing you brought the light inside the body ... and then I see the disinfectant, when it knocks it out in a minute ...
3 Ferritin nanoparticles used in vaccine development -- Nanotechnology increasingly plays a significant role in vaccine development in the past decade, leading to the birth of “nanovaccinology” [47]. The use of nanoparticles in vaccine formulations is expected to have improved antigen stability and immunogenicity, targeted delivery and slow release property [48–50]. There have been many types of nanoparticle used in the field of vaccine development [51], including polymeric nanoparticles [52–54], inorganic nanoparticles [55,56], liposomes [57], virus-like particles [58,59], self-assembled proteins [60], etc. Ferritin, with its particle uniformity and inner/outer surface modifiable features, can play an important role in the field of vaccine development.
Kanekiyo et al. [61] used Helicobacter pylori non-haem ferritin [62] to develop a vaccine which can elicit broadly neutralizing H1N1 antibodies. Haemagglutinin of influenza virus was inserted at the interface of adjacent subunits so that eight trimeric viral spikes are formed on the surface of ferritin nanoparticle during the spontaneous assembly process. Immunization with this influenza-ferritin nano-particle vaccine produced haemagglutination inhibition antibody titers of one magnitude higher than those from the licensed inactivated vaccine.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent professional antigen-presenting cells that initiate and control antigen-specific immune responses. DCs plays an important role in internalizing, processing, and presenting antigens to naive T cells and inducing their proliferation and differentiation into effector cells, such as CD8+ cytotoxic T cells to kill infected target cells or CD4+ helper T cells to secrete cytokines and facilitate diverse forms of cellular and humoral immunity [63]. DC-based vaccine development has been a promising approach to direct antigen-specific adaptive immunity in vivo [64,65]. Han et al. [66] used ferritin nanoparticles to display different ovalbumin antigens. The ovalbumin antigenic peptides OT-1 (Oval-bumin257–264) [67] and OT-2 (Ovalbumin323–339) [67] were genetically introduced either onto the exterior surface or into the interior cavity of ferritin, and the nanoparticles were effectively delivered to DCs and processed within endosomes, followed by successful induction of antigen-specific CD8+ or CD4+ T cells. On the other hand, this ferritin-OT nanoparticle immune effect was also confirmed on mice. Immunized with ferritin-OT1 peptides efficiently differentiated OT-1 specific CD8+ T cells into functional effector cytotoxic T cells, resulting in selective killing of antigen-specific target cells. Immunized with ferritin-OT2 peptides resulted in the differentiation of proliferated OT-2 specific CD4+ T cells into functional CD4+ Th1 and Th2 cells which was confirmed by the detection of the cell-produced IFN-γ/IL-2 and IL-10/IL-13 cytokines.
Ferritin is a spherical iron storage protein composed of 24 subunits and an iron core. Using biomimetic mineralization, magnetic iron oxide can be synthesized in the cavity of ferritin to form magnetoferritin (MFt). MFt, also known as a superparamagnetic protein, is a novel magnetic nanomaterial with good biocompatibility and flexibility for biomedical applications. Recently, it has been demonstrated that MFt had tumor targetability and a peroxidase-like catalytic activity. Thus, MFt, with its many unique properties, provides a powerful platform for tumor diagnosis and therapy. In this review, we discuss the biomimetic synthesis and biomedical applications of MFt.
Biomedical Applications -- MFt has been widely applied in the biomedical field due to its unique properties, including tissue imaging, drug delivery, and medical diagnosis [1]. Artificial MFt has also been used as a model system of pathological ferritin to investigate the corresponding underlying biological mechanism involved [19]. Recently, MFt containing an iron oxide core achieved many advances in biomedical applications, and an additional modification has greatly expanded the field (Table 1).
(Much later)
In addition to applications, such as tumor imaging and diagnosis, MFt could also be used for tumor therapy as a nanocarrier.
I would like you to think about the very powerful electromagnetic fields generated inside an MRI scanner and what effect they have on the blood, if any.
I would like someone to determine how much mass of actual iron would need to be immediately below the skin to hold a small magnet - and what color the skin would be? Because in my opinion, you'd need at least half a gram and the skin would be very red or brown. Maybe a little experimentation required with, say, a piece of paper and iron filings?
Sooo, are you saying the shots, even Trump says to take, are overall good, or bad? It sounds like you’re saying they are designed to cure cancer. I mean, I’m not going to get that shot regardless, but it’s hard to understand where you’re coming from. I see what you’re saying.. so yay or nay in your book?
Honestly, I think it’s possible the shots might be designed to cure themselves, I.e. fix their own self-caused problems through magnetic induction heating. Generate an electric field around the body, and heat the magneto-ferritine along with the Pharmaceutical infection it binds to inside of the body. A “self-cure.” I believe the military may have been involved to ensure that magnetoferritin was present or added to vaccines during roll-out.
Different companies making it means different implementations and procedures - Moderna and Pfizer are mRNA while J&J isn’t. Pfizer has a pretty good chance of causing Myocarditis, Moderna has significant allergic reactions and can cause clotting issues, and J&J can cause more clotting issues than even the Moderna.
This isn’t even touching on the obvious hormonal and fertility issues in both men and women.
I am a firm believer in magnetics as the way of the future for medicine, transportation, weaponry, and space exploration. If magnetoferritine is what’s in these vaccines, and what explains why they stick to people, then I can only assume they’re there for a reason.
Am I going to get the jab, or order others to get the jab? No. I just don’t trust the corporations behind it, no matter how involved the military is. I do believe it’s part of the plan that some get vaccinated - I also believe that Trump, from time to time, preaches against what he believes to maintain neutrality.
The bottom line is the only thing I’m certain about is Q, and the power of magnetics.
Isn't it strange, after 2 week or more of this, none of TGP or OANN has covered this yet. Has any journalist professional or medical professional investigated this (first hand, with samples, not merely looking at vids)?
After 2 weeks, has Steve Bannon weighed in? After 2 weeks, has Alex Jones weighed in? Not even him? You'd think some of these big shots would have checked the story and ran it by now, and it would be posted here breathlessly. Wouldn't all these victims be running off to report to some journalists by now? Someone tell them!
Y'know, I will still gawk by the sidelines on this.
What's really fucking strange, is I just realized - now - that Trump was telling us about this the entire time.
Magnetoferritin is used to locate cancer cells, as a "light" injected inside the body, making it easy as pie for visualization devices to pick it up. See pic.
And Trump said this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYJY_elndY8
It proves the concept behind the following article - https://www.biotechniques.com/cancer-research/magnetoferritin-a-new-effective-marker-for-tumor-diagnosis-and-treatment/
Holy fucking shit, dude.
Trump was talking about UV, a whole other different thing, nothing to do with introduced any particles. It's just UV light (and there are at least 3 UV light range class, and common UV LEDs are not very effective at disinfecting -- not the ideal UV light type).
UV and chlorine were therapies that some countries were trying out at that time, particularly some South American ones. Their focus is the nose and throat area, which is likely the weak point were flu virus enter. I think there is some effect, but degrading virus particles takes time -- it may work as a preventive measure as long as the virus particles introduced is low.
Magnetoferritin won't do much with UV, and in fact you might split them up because UV is good at degrading protein-based complexes (as it is in killing virus, given enough time).
The premise is the same. Same reason the injection sights would be magnetic - iron in the body concentrates in areas of inflammation, likewise magnetoferritine concentrates in areas of inflammation - lighting up said area in turn when imaged.
UV Light generates "heat," which kills. Sunlight kills is a point Q emphasized twice.
Yes, I'm well aware of the "chlorine" therapies and the controversy along those lines - not focused on that. UV, rather. Electromagnets make sense too - ever built an induction forge in your garage?
Consider the following:
https://youtu.be/QZKhlYG6yLc?t=60
Do you understand what I mean, when I say the concept he addressed in the press conference, may be related to this campaign trail promise, and may be related directly to the immense leaps in magnetic technology made during his administration? See for instance the dates of the numerous articles I've linked regarding magnetoferritine -
https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC5831262&blobtype=pdf 2017
https://www.biotechniques.com/cancer-research/magnetoferritin-a-new-effective-marker-for-tumor-diagnosis-and-treatment/ 2018
https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/10/2426/htm 2019
I haven't even touched on the advancements in magnetic theory patented by Salvatore Pais of USN / now USAF during and leading up to Trump's presidency either.
Trusting my source, I'm betting on it, big, now. I mean you can doubt, I will not attempt to change your mind and I'm not going to think of you any differently either way on what your evaluation of my understanding is here. What matters to me is I think I figured it out the mystery I've been interested in. That's what's big to me.
UV can't get very far into the skin. Sunlight won't reach much into the nose and throat tract. Or lungs, unless you can push a UV light fiber in there.
Suppose the vacc has such nanoparticles and UV in sunlight activates it. But the vacc is supposed to stay in the arm and not zip around in the bloodstream, which is why in Europe they adjusted the procedure to check for blood -- they didn't want to jab into a vein.
So it stays around the arm and say it gets UV. Then your UV or heat therapy would only be good near the injection area. But the worst-hit (or most susceptible, due to ACE2 receptors) organ is often the lungs.
Zapping nanoparticles to kill cancer cells is common research. But virus replicates inside normal cells. How to target them? Ferretin cannot magically seek virus-infected cells. It's not a smart nanobot. Targeting is an issue here.
Well, about the induction current thing, you should try to find people who can zap nanoparticles with a coil and get them hot. Coupling a coil and nanoparticles? Can you induce viable current loops in a single Fe ion? (Because when complexed with Ferretin, it's all separate single Fe ions complexed with the protein.)
It's late, I'll have to get back to you after I get some sleep, work, and have time again for research, but I'm not just gonna leave you hanging:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8i2OVqWo9s0
"Heat." Maybe that's the idea? I don't know - opens a door though, have to look when I can.
Morning Edit:
Apparently, Trump beat me to it.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/09/04/909348915/president-trumps-new-covid-19-advisor-is-making-public-health-experts-nervous
Back in September 2020, he selected a magnetic resonance imaging specialist as a leading Covid-19 advisor.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging deals directly with magnetoferritin as a nanoprobe to detect ‘infection’ in individuals - https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/nnm-2016-0369?journalCode=nnm - deal
If magnetoferritin is in the vaccine, then with certainty - due to the amount of inflammation in the tissue in the injection site, it would in turn bind to that area, at least temporarily. Ordinary iron does so - even sweat can cause partial magnetism, so surely a concentration of magnetoferritin.
Further to be continued -
Need more research.
Nice connection!
Nah. Magnetoferritin is not what you should be worried about. If anything, it's a cool distraction from the things you should be worried about, like myocarditis from Pfizer.
Magnetoferritin is just a nanocarrier, it is safe, and essentially iron bound to proteins injected into your bloodstream.
Here's an interesting fact - Covid-19 and low serum iron - or iron deficiency - are correlated. Infected areas basically gather what little iron there is, and the condition worsens significantly when you have iron deficiency. https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/7/7/ofaa250/5860447 Magnetoferritin is simply serum iron. It's pretty useful, biomedically.
What did we have a shortage of during the 2020 Covid outbreak, and what were stores limiting purchases of?
Red meat.
If anything, the 'magnet conspiracy' is the manipulation of the community by bad actors that use a truth as a battering ram to make us look insane. Sort of like what Alex Jones does.
I have to ask, is your profession related to biomedical field ? Wondering how someone would build up a knowledge of all this.
No, I'm just an investigator, I put together pieces and solve problems, and I'm pretty quick about it when the ball gets rolling. Sometimes you can see it happen right in front of you...
Hence why I have to say my comment above that you replied to originally, is incorrect. Magnetoferritin isn't a substitute for iron deficient folks, it's a tool - used to locate cancer cells, as a "light" injected inside the body, making it easy to see. See pic hot-linked in the sentence.
As I was researching tonight, I remembered something Trump was barraged with hate for - his "disinfectant" comment, where he said this:
It proves the concept behind the following article -
https://www.biotechniques.com/cancer-research/magnetoferritin-a-new-effective-marker-for-tumor-diagnosis-and-treatment/
I only now realized that Trump paraphrased exactly the concept presented within that article. 'Light' in body, acquire target, destroy target with 'light.' He dumbs down his vocabulary consistently - probably went overboard enough for defenders to think "UV Light" and the moronic haters to think "lysol."
I've been obsessed with magnetics for the past month for reasons related to US Military scientist Salvatore Pais (check him out if you feel like learning about the "ufos" declassed by the Pentagon) but I had no idea that they were already mainstream biomedical items. I speculate that "magnetism" is going to be the future of medicine.
So you're saying the spike proteins in the shot draw iron to the area of the shot? So that means the videos aren't a hoax, but a real side effect? If so, why the debunking?
Am I understanding what you're suggesting correctly?
Iron is drawn to any area of inflammation really. In cases of Covid, for instance, it's drawn to infected lungs - which if you have an iron deficiency, contributes to poor health and eventually death.
Rather - magnetoferritin functions a lot like Iron, in that it likewise is drawn to areas of inflammation. To give you an excellent example, let's say you inject it into a patient with cancer, or tumors. Magnetoferritin is attracted to the infected area, and makes it easier for imaging devices to determine where the cancer is. See associated picture.
I may have overstepped in stating that it's harmless, however. Electromagnetic fields and fuck with the function of blood platelets.
See study A and study B
Anyway - to summarize, magnetoferritin and/or ferritin serves as a useful nanocarrier for drugs. Ferritin is guaranteed to be utilized in vaccines, and given the severity of Covid - likely a bioweapon designed by American traitors and built by their Chinese black site - maybe the intent is to determine areas damaged by Covid after the plan is complete. Or maybe something else - Q wrote plenty about cancer for example, which this shit detects.
Ultimately, I'm just an investigator. Not a medical practitioner. I started doing this research only tonight, so you're getting my best guess so far - which is that the injection sites are magnetic due to magnetoferritin which by and large, seems like a positive, useful biomedical invention.
Could there be bad risks associated with it? I don't have enough information to tell for sure.
Edit: Holy shit dude. Something just clicked.
https://www.biotechniques.com/cancer-research/magnetoferritin-a-new-effective-marker-for-tumor-diagnosis-and-treatment/
And Trump said this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYJY_elndY8
Mystery solved: Direct link to PDF Here.
Additional article follows;
https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/10/2426/htm
(Much later)
I would like you to think about the very powerful electromagnetic fields generated inside an MRI scanner and what effect they have on the blood, if any.
I would like someone to determine how much mass of actual iron would need to be immediately below the skin to hold a small magnet - and what color the skin would be? Because in my opinion, you'd need at least half a gram and the skin would be very red or brown. Maybe a little experimentation required with, say, a piece of paper and iron filings?
Don't forget moisture on the skin as well can help hold a magnet up so not much iron is needed in theory.
When you have new skin developing there is more blood flow and moisture at the injection site.
Sooo, are you saying the shots, even Trump says to take, are overall good, or bad? It sounds like you’re saying they are designed to cure cancer. I mean, I’m not going to get that shot regardless, but it’s hard to understand where you’re coming from. I see what you’re saying.. so yay or nay in your book?
Honestly, I think it’s possible the shots might be designed to cure themselves, I.e. fix their own self-caused problems through magnetic induction heating. Generate an electric field around the body, and heat the magneto-ferritine along with the Pharmaceutical infection it binds to inside of the body. A “self-cure.” I believe the military may have been involved to ensure that magnetoferritin was present or added to vaccines during roll-out.
Different companies making it means different implementations and procedures - Moderna and Pfizer are mRNA while J&J isn’t. Pfizer has a pretty good chance of causing Myocarditis, Moderna has significant allergic reactions and can cause clotting issues, and J&J can cause more clotting issues than even the Moderna.
This isn’t even touching on the obvious hormonal and fertility issues in both men and women.
I am a firm believer in magnetics as the way of the future for medicine, transportation, weaponry, and space exploration. If magnetoferritine is what’s in these vaccines, and what explains why they stick to people, then I can only assume they’re there for a reason.
Am I going to get the jab, or order others to get the jab? No. I just don’t trust the corporations behind it, no matter how involved the military is. I do believe it’s part of the plan that some get vaccinated - I also believe that Trump, from time to time, preaches against what he believes to maintain neutrality.
The bottom line is the only thing I’m certain about is Q, and the power of magnetics.
I do feel like you’re on to something. And I thank you for all your info.