After a brief yet terse tribunal that lasted only 3 hours and saw a bitter, resentful, and combative John Brennan battling Rear Adm. Darse E. Crandall, who presented the military’s case on behalf of the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps, a three-officer panel formed of 1 male and 2 females convicted the former CIA director of murder and treason and sentenced him to be hanged.
At 10:30 a.m., military police escorted a handcuffed Brennan into GITMO’s south courtroom and seated him at the counsel table where his legal advocate, David H. Anderson of Howrey LLP, awaited his arrival.
From the moment Brennan entered the courtroom, he scowled menacingly at both Rear Adm. Crandall and the three officers charged with weighing the merits of the case against him. His scrunched face and sour puss regarded them with what can be described only as hateful contempt.
Rear Adm. Crandall wasted few words tying Brennan to multiple murders he had orchestrated while serving as Obama’s CIA director between 2009-2013. The epic arguments began with Crandall producing a 2012 agency document that authorized the assassination of conservative publishing mogul Andrew Breitbart, who on March 1, 2012 inexplicably dropped dead while walking home from a restaurant in Brentwood, California. The Los Angeles County Coroner’s Office claimed Breitbart died of a heart attack, even though he had been in good health and had no family history of coronary artery disease.
The document shown to the panel had Brennan’s signature at the bottom of the page.
Rear Adm. Crandall read from it aloud: “Andrew Breitbart, publisher of Breitbart.com, has proved to be a domestic terrorist and a threat to national security, per section 215 of the Patriot Act. By order of B.H.O., Breitbart is to be considered a target of opportunity provided discretionary measures are used in carrying out agency transactions.”
“At the request of Barack Hussein Obama, apparently, you ordered Breitbart’s murder,” Rear Adm. Crandall said, addressing Brennan directly.
Brennan sprang to his feet and with apoplectic fury said, “I served my country as ordered. I admit nothing. I deny nothing. The only thing I see here is a bunch of pussies hiding behind Donald Trump. You’re all cowards.”
His legal advocate, David H. Anderson, tried to silence him, but Brennan continued to rampage: “Any action I’ve ever taken was in the interest of national security and protecting this once great nation of ours from subversive threats. You’re all too obtuse to understand that.”
Following a brief recess, Rear Adm. Crandall introduced a witness for the prosecution, a former CIA spook named James Gaeffer who said he had murdered five law-abiding Americans, including Andrew Breitbart, while under Brennan’s control. He told the panel he had used a “heart attack gun” to kill Breitbart and other persons on Obama’s infamous enemies list.
He described two types of weapons; one that fired an ice-encased poison bullet; the other, and more contemporary weapon, fired an ionized burst of highly concentrated microwave energy into a victim’s body, causing in most cases an immediate myocardial infraction. Gaeffer testified he had used such a weapon on Breitbart.
“And you were told by John Brennan to do this?” Rear Adm. Crandall asked him.
“I was. He told me straight off that Breitbart was criminally culpable for exposing Anthony Winer’s sexting texts with an underage girl, for questioning Obama’s nationality, for helping to expose that Michelle Obama is really a man. I was told to remove him with extreme prejudice,” Gaeffer said.
“Did you kill other people at Brennan’s request?” Rear Adm. Crandall asked.
Gaeffer admitted he had, naming specifically a journalist for Rolling Stone Magazine, Michael Hastings, who in 2013 perished in a fatal car-crash after revealing that he was working on a profile of Brennan for the magazine. His article highlighted Brennan’s war on journalists who questioned the Obama regime’s drone strikes against American citizens both at home and abroad.
Although the circumstances surrounding his death were initially considered suspicious, WikiLeaks countered the official findings, tweeting on June 19 that “Michael Hastings death has a very serious nonpublic complication,” but after that the incident drifted into the shadows and was seldom spoken of again.
“So, you killed Hastings, at Brennan’s request?” Rear Adm. Crandall asked Gaeffer.
“I did. I knew where he’d be, when he’d be. It was all quite simple,” Gaeffer said. “I killed others at his bidding, and I know other agency personnel who killed good people because Brennan wanted them dead. I regret what I’ve done, for what good it’s worth, but, yes, I too am guilty.”
Brennan again leapt to his feet, shaking his handcuffed hands in the air. “I say again, my actions were taken for the betterment of this country, against people trying to destroy or weaken it. You want to convict me for following lawful orders that helped to protect this nation—then do it. Everything I did, I’d do again. You’re all a group of cowards. I spit on all of you,” Brennan said, and spat on the floor. “The only true leaders of this country in the last thirty years were William Clinton and Barack Obama, everything else is a farse. Want to sentence me to death? Do it. Do it now. I’m not afraid to die. I’m proud to have served this country the way I have,” Brennan said.
Rear Adm. Crandall asked the panel whether they had heard enough, and it said it had. It recommended Brennan receive capitol punishment in the form of being hanged by the neck until death for the myriad atrocities he had committed against America and its people. Rear Adm. Crandall agreed, and he declared that Brennan’s execution be held on Monday, June 7, which, incidentally, is one week after John Podesta is scheduled to face a firing squad for his crimes.
It may all be fantastical fan-fic, but it is soooooo enjoyable to read and relish the possibility of such visuals!
Agreed. I'm loving those updates from gitmo. Corney being brought out of his cell to watch Hillary swing was enjoyable reading.
there's more of these?
I missed that one!
I can picture him scowling and spitting like the demonic entity he is. Even if it is just a 'story', it truly entertains. The one about Hillary's tribunal was fun reading too.
If true the executions need to be public. We need closure and others involved need to fear what may come to them.
"capitol punishment" lol
misspellings matter!
;)
Ach, das kapital!! ?
Anthony Winer
All I can say is WOW
They love putting out stories like this but until any proof it just is that....a story
weaving in Hastings and Brietbart was especially compelling
like I said, 'entertaining'
4.2 years ago, I posted this about Brennan on Voat:
Honestly, nobody knew what the fuck was going on back then, except for a few thousand Pizzagate investigators. Now, half the world knows the crimes of Brennan and Obama. Great Awakening.
Ahhhhhh Grasshoppas, the very thought of this really happening will give me sweet dreams for a week! Kek
Please let's not promote real raw news. They were claiming Hillary was executed.
It's hard enough finding the facts.
the disclaimer is in the title and the site is not linked
Don't tell people what to post. I hate that.
The site states that it's satire. Do you want to block the Babylon Bee site, too?
It could all be true but with out proof I'll never accept it.
This. You can see by the comments on RRN that a LOT of people think it’s very real. Not good, IMO, shows a real lack of discernment...
I love when pontificating handshake accounts act like blowhards telling everyone what 'makes us look bad'.
You have ZERO submissions on this sub. Stop with the low effort concern trolling and acting like you're part of any movement.
Do sorcha next LoL
Watch the handshakes all lose their fuckin minds. Don't folks see yet that the best place to hide truth is between two lies?
https://qposts.online/post/3662
I’m only talking about the comment section on RRN, not directed at you personally or anyone here- I apologize, reading it back I sound like snarky pissant.
To clarify, you identified that they’re to be taken with a grain of salt, maybe there’s something to the Brennan story based on OTHER observations, as did the rest of GA comments. To contrast, the Comments on RRN sound like an uncritical and bloodthirsty bunch. They come off like MSM caricatures of anons- not even anons, more like caricatures of the “crazy conspiracy people” they want to portray us as.
They publish bullshit and expect the public to believe so why is it such a stretch that this case isn't actually taking place. I agree that it's far fetched only because they never prosecute their own but it's what should happen.
Well, shoe us the video of this court trial, if it's not public I will never believe it happened.
If the powers who supposedly are doing this do not realize that then I'll never follow any of rhem. Not trump, not anyone. We deserve comete transparency and closure. Without it I'll believe it no more than anything else we've been lied to about. Be cautious
This could very well be White Hat predictive programming.
It's important to know what you want to see happen. This helps paint that picture. If the stories become confirmed that would be wild. If the stories are pure fiction and drum up a desire to see such things take place, cool, that helps.
I love the homage to "Shawshank Redemption" in there.... Fun read!
Therapeutic fiction.
Love it!
They could add an approaching hurricane and some kind of romantic interest plot device among the lawyers to give the story some depth.
Happy hour after proceedings??? ?
Would be nice if it were true
Reading it put a smile on my face and it felt nice.
It may not be true NOW, but I fully expect Brennan's fate to be very similar.
I'll take that.
probably fake but entertaining.
I don’t think we should be promoting “hope porn” that doesn’t identify itself as such. Don’t get me wrong, I LOVE reading RRN for what it is- entertainment- but the guy who writes the articles (Michael Baxter) jumps into the comments and goes further to convince people that it’s all real and factual. This has the effect of acting almost like planted disinfo, because people who think it’s absolutely real pass this “news” to normies and makes us look crazy.
He has a disclaimer on his “About” page that says the site is satire/entertainment, but it’s buried. I agree with what another commenter said, it’s hard enough to find real news, clearly fake news presented as “real” just makes the movement look bad.
or it's white hat predictive programming
did you ever consider that?
Do you honestly think Real Raw News, which talks about nothing except Gitmo trials and MIL executions, is a source for anything but entertainment? Do you think it’s a good look when people who think it’s real adamantly insist to friends and family that visible public figures have been executed and replaced by clones?
I’m not trying to “concern troll”, I’m just pointing out Real Raw News is not real, it’s not News. It’s a paytriot looking for clicks. I’m happy to consume his fan fiction, I’d just prefer it be labeled as such. I don’t need it to be any more than what it is, I’m not sure why you do. Are you Michael Baxter?
Same to you, buddy. I heard georgenews is a great source of intel, you’ll love it.