Nothing matches up. It's a bunch of schizo horseshit. All of it is cherrypicked out of context and stupid theories like this are why Q had to make this post:
Jesus Christ some of the people on here are inconceivably stupid
You will get no argument from me on this.
Sometimes things have more than one meaning, per Q.
Both of those events can easily fit the 11.3 and 11.5 in the war manual. And its not just there. Its in every instance those are used it makes sense contextually.
Its not like I want it to be that way. I don't give a shit. It's that it IS that way. To ignore it because you don't want it to be that way is well...
They match up to so much. It just makes so much sense that they are exactly that.
What evidence do you have to support such a bold statement?
Media Matters told him so.
Nothing matches up. It's a bunch of schizo horseshit. All of it is cherrypicked out of context and stupid theories like this are why Q had to make this post:
https://qanon.pub/?q=speculation
Are you stupid or just a shill? 11.3 is 100% a reference to the law of war manual. Q hinted as much. Now fuck off.
I know right. Hard to tell
In which post did Q hint as much?
Which is more "speculation" and weaponizable?
Expecting specific dates, or linking things that actually match up?
Have you read the war manual 11.3 etc.?
Every time it is mentioned everything makes a ton of sense in that context.
Motherfucker, I linked a post in which Q CONFIRMS what occurred on two dates. Jesus Christ some of the people on here are inconceivably stupid.
You will get no argument from me on this.
Sometimes things have more than one meaning, per Q.
Both of those events can easily fit the 11.3 and 11.5 in the war manual. And its not just there. Its in every instance those are used it makes sense contextually.
Its not like I want it to be that way. I don't give a shit. It's that it IS that way. To ignore it because you don't want it to be that way is well...
I'll leave it at that.