I appreciate the hard work you have done, but your conclusions are incorrect. I will break it down for you piece by piece.
Luciferase
Luciferase is a an enzyme that catalyzes a reaction (in this case with the molecule luciferin + O2). All chemical reactions produce (or absorb) photons. Commonly these photons are in the infrared (loosely called "heat" because it is in the range of the vibrational energy transition of molecules). This one is special (though not unique) in that it produces photons in the visible spectrum and is thus easily visible under the microscope. When you attach Luciferase to another protein (a fusion or coexpression, I'm not sure which in this case) it allows you to see where that other protein of interest is or when it has been expressed. (In this case that is an HIV protein).
HIV-Luc
HIV-Luc cell line is a cell line that contains the HIV virus genome within the cells genome to study HIV. The "Luc" part is just the fusion of the Luciferase gene to the HIV genes so that it can be seen under the microscope when the HIV genes have been transcribed.
A "cell line" is a cell type that has been genetically altered to study specific diseases, or for convenience (immortal cell lines e.g.) or for tissue type studies, or for stem cell studies, etc. There are many different "cell lines". This one is used to study HIV with the convenience of the Luciferase reporter.
HIV is the lentivirus, not Luciferase.
HIV-Luc(ACE-2) From Fauci's email
This is using the HIV-Luc cell line, fused to ANOTHER protein (ACE-2) to study where the ACE-2--HIV-Luc protein is. ACE-2 is a transmembrane protein so the other part (HIV-Luc) would be hanging out in the cytosol, doing nothing except reporting where the ACE-2 protein is. This is useful for studying the ACE-2 protein and/or its interaction with the SARS S-protein.
The fact that it says "Coronavirus bioweapon production method" is nefarious. It looks to me like they were studying ACE-2 SARS-CoV-2 fusion efficiency. That's pretty standard stuff, but since it was obviously being done for nefarious purposes that makes it pretty evil. However, using HIV-Luc is not. That's just normal cell biology stuff.
This is not ingredients in the vaccine. The HIV-Luc cell line is used in virus testing and creation. This does not make it part of the virus either. It's just the cell line they used in its development which is completely unsurprising. This cell line was designed for testing all sorts of things.
If you want to find something sinister where there is nothing sinister I can not stop you. I have explained why the HIV-Luc system is a commonly used system.
There is something else I forgot to mention above. The lipid called SM-102 has nothing to do with Luciferase specifically. The sheet you used in your graphic explains how it has been used to create a lipid nanoparticle to deliver mRNA for the reporter Luciferase. It can be used to create the same type of nanoparticle to deliver ANY mRNA, such as the mRNA that encodes the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, or a protein for a cancer specific surface protein (a common usage) or mRNA for any protein you want.
In the sheet you have it says "Luciferase" as an example because it is the most used reporter protein because when it catalyzes its reaction it gives off a photon in the visible spectrum. That's IT. Luciferase is not only not sinister, it is used all over the world in every bio lab everywhere because it is so damn useful, because it brings light (visible) and allows us to see, in real time, what is going on. If I used it as a reporter in my nanoparticle it tells me exactly which cells my nanoparticle made it into. That is useful for a million reasons.
Was it called "Luciferase" (bringer of light) 120+ years ago by the discoverer in tribute to Satan? Maybe, maybe not. I have no idea. But if that is true, that is not something that most of the hundreds of thousands (probably) of people that use it regularly have any clue about (myself included until recently) Its just an amazingly useful tool in the cell bio toolkit.
SM-102 not being approved safe for human use means that it hasn't been sufficiently tested, or tested and not yet approved.
Looking at the molecule I see no obvious problems, but who knows. I'm not particularly concerned about it, but it absolutely shouldn't be being injected without testing. Again, maybe it has been tested, shown to be innocuous and just not yet approved. Or its been tested and shown to cause cancer etc. (Unlikely imo but not impossible.) Its an unknown.
The data sheet itself is about the whole product, which is SM-102 in chloroform which is what the hazardous label is for. Its just how it is stored and sent, likely to prevent clumping. When used to create the nanoparticles the chloroform is removed.
Again, HIV is a lentivirus. That's the classification of virus that it is.
There are two things going on here.
There is the HIV-Luc cell line and/or plasmid and/or virion (whole virus), which are somewhat different things, all used for studying other things, and there is the fusion of two virions that was used (according to this email which is questionable) to create the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
That has absolutely no connection to any vaccine (at least not with any evidence presented here).
I am not in any way suggesting this isn't sinister as fuck. I am saying it is important to recognize the distinction of what is going on here, and not confuse it with what is not.
I don't understand what is going on with this virion fusion. It's going to take a virologist who creates their own viruses to explain this I think. If there were more information I could do it, but its a little too cryptic for me to decipher.
Normally a fusion of cells is taking one cell and fusing it to another. To fascilitate such fusion sometimes one cell will be genetically altered to express a protein that has a receptor on another cell. After fusion there will be a single cell with two nuclei. Inducing mitosis in such a cell will cause the nuclei to fuse into one, with the resulting daughter cells getting a mishmash of DNA. If they are viable they will be a combination of the genetics of the original two cells which can be grown and their unique properties studied.
It sounds to me like they are doing the same thing with HIV and SARS? (Big maybe on that.) Its confusing, because the RNA (genome) of the SARS-CoV-2 does not have enough HIV RNA to justify such a mixture (its only a dozen or so nucleotide similarity I think).
Its important to remember though, the Luciferase is in the HIV virus because Luciferase is a great tool for being able to see which cells have been infected. It is not in and of itself in any way sinister.
The email itself may be the smoking gun, or it may be nothing. If it was sent FROM Fauci, it would be immediate GITMO for Fauci. Because it was sent to him from someone unknown (as far as I know) it doesn't have a direct connection to him, and isn't really proof of anything (yet). It could have been sent by someone who Fauci had no connection with, or for whom there can be no connection established other than this one email. It could have been a hoax email for all I know.
In the 1880s, Raphaël Dubois experimented with bioluminescent clams and beetles which led him to discover bioluminescence molecules which he named luciferin and luciferase.
The word lucifer is derived from Latin lux "light" and ferre "to bring". The suffixes "ace" and "in" are generic suffixes used for enzymes and proteins.
The molecules Luciferase and Luciferin are an oxidative enzyme and a substrate respectively. These molecules are responsible for causing bioluminescence. The enzyme and substrate bind together into what is called an enzyme-substrate complex to cause a reaction.
The luciferase is not in the vaccine. The HIV-Luc cell line is used in testing and virus creation. This does not make it part of the virus either. It's just the cell line they used in its development.
None if any of this goes into the vaccine. They are completely separate processes.
Purpose
(Empty Backbone) Self-inactivating 3rd generation lentiviral plasmid for co-expression of your gene of interest and luciferase.
Luciferase is not a virus, it is an enzyme which is a type of protein. What this is saying is that it is using a lentiviral plasmid. A plasmid is a ring of double stranded DNA that is often used for gene cloning. The desired genes are spliced into the plasmid which becomes a recombinant plasmid that can be replicated to produce large quantities of the desired genes.
No, I'm saying that they were splicing genes into the plasmid to go along with the HIV backbone, probably a spike protein along with the luciferase reporter.
I think that they were using the plasmids to produce altered viral DNA in order to create a modified virus. There is a diagram of the plasmid in your image, but it is too blurry to read.
Flushthisdownthetoiletase is what it should be made of.
I appreciate the hard work you have done, but your conclusions are incorrect. I will break it down for you piece by piece.
Luciferase
Luciferase is a an enzyme that catalyzes a reaction (in this case with the molecule luciferin + O2). All chemical reactions produce (or absorb) photons. Commonly these photons are in the infrared (loosely called "heat" because it is in the range of the vibrational energy transition of molecules). This one is special (though not unique) in that it produces photons in the visible spectrum and is thus easily visible under the microscope. When you attach Luciferase to another protein (a fusion or coexpression, I'm not sure which in this case) it allows you to see where that other protein of interest is or when it has been expressed. (In this case that is an HIV protein).
HIV-Luc
HIV-Luc cell line is a cell line that contains the HIV virus genome within the cells genome to study HIV. The "Luc" part is just the fusion of the Luciferase gene to the HIV genes so that it can be seen under the microscope when the HIV genes have been transcribed.
A "cell line" is a cell type that has been genetically altered to study specific diseases, or for convenience (immortal cell lines e.g.) or for tissue type studies, or for stem cell studies, etc. There are many different "cell lines". This one is used to study HIV with the convenience of the Luciferase reporter.
HIV is the lentivirus, not Luciferase.
HIV-Luc(ACE-2) From Fauci's email
This is using the HIV-Luc cell line, fused to ANOTHER protein (ACE-2) to study where the ACE-2--HIV-Luc protein is. ACE-2 is a transmembrane protein so the other part (HIV-Luc) would be hanging out in the cytosol, doing nothing except reporting where the ACE-2 protein is. This is useful for studying the ACE-2 protein and/or its interaction with the SARS S-protein.
The fact that it says "Coronavirus bioweapon production method" is nefarious. It looks to me like they were studying ACE-2 SARS-CoV-2 fusion efficiency. That's pretty standard stuff, but since it was obviously being done for nefarious purposes that makes it pretty evil. However, using HIV-Luc is not. That's just normal cell biology stuff.
Thank you for that breakdown.
Can the HIV part of this infect people?
This is not ingredients in the vaccine. The HIV-Luc cell line is used in virus testing and creation. This does not make it part of the virus either. It's just the cell line they used in its development which is completely unsurprising. This cell line was designed for testing all sorts of things.
Again, totally common cell bio stuff.
Totally normal HIV plasmids being used.
If you want to find something sinister where there is nothing sinister I can not stop you. I have explained why the HIV-Luc system is a commonly used system.
There is something else I forgot to mention above. The lipid called SM-102 has nothing to do with Luciferase specifically. The sheet you used in your graphic explains how it has been used to create a lipid nanoparticle to deliver mRNA for the reporter Luciferase. It can be used to create the same type of nanoparticle to deliver ANY mRNA, such as the mRNA that encodes the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, or a protein for a cancer specific surface protein (a common usage) or mRNA for any protein you want.
In the sheet you have it says "Luciferase" as an example because it is the most used reporter protein because when it catalyzes its reaction it gives off a photon in the visible spectrum. That's IT. Luciferase is not only not sinister, it is used all over the world in every bio lab everywhere because it is so damn useful, because it brings light (visible) and allows us to see, in real time, what is going on. If I used it as a reporter in my nanoparticle it tells me exactly which cells my nanoparticle made it into. That is useful for a million reasons.
Was it called "Luciferase" (bringer of light) 120+ years ago by the discoverer in tribute to Satan? Maybe, maybe not. I have no idea. But if that is true, that is not something that most of the hundreds of thousands (probably) of people that use it regularly have any clue about (myself included until recently) Its just an amazingly useful tool in the cell bio toolkit.
Why would lentivirus HIV protein be used? I mean the sinister nature of it is in its name, HIV.
It also states the SM-102 is not for human use.
SM-102 not being approved safe for human use means that it hasn't been sufficiently tested, or tested and not yet approved.
Looking at the molecule I see no obvious problems, but who knows. I'm not particularly concerned about it, but it absolutely shouldn't be being injected without testing. Again, maybe it has been tested, shown to be innocuous and just not yet approved. Or its been tested and shown to cause cancer etc. (Unlikely imo but not impossible.) Its an unknown.
The data sheet itself is about the whole product, which is SM-102 in chloroform which is what the hazardous label is for. Its just how it is stored and sent, likely to prevent clumping. When used to create the nanoparticles the chloroform is removed.
Again, HIV is a lentivirus. That's the classification of virus that it is.
There are two things going on here.
There is the HIV-Luc cell line and/or plasmid and/or virion (whole virus), which are somewhat different things, all used for studying other things, and there is the fusion of two virions that was used (according to this email which is questionable) to create the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
That has absolutely no connection to any vaccine (at least not with any evidence presented here).
I am not in any way suggesting this isn't sinister as fuck. I am saying it is important to recognize the distinction of what is going on here, and not confuse it with what is not.
I don't understand what is going on with this virion fusion. It's going to take a virologist who creates their own viruses to explain this I think. If there were more information I could do it, but its a little too cryptic for me to decipher.
Normally a fusion of cells is taking one cell and fusing it to another. To fascilitate such fusion sometimes one cell will be genetically altered to express a protein that has a receptor on another cell. After fusion there will be a single cell with two nuclei. Inducing mitosis in such a cell will cause the nuclei to fuse into one, with the resulting daughter cells getting a mishmash of DNA. If they are viable they will be a combination of the genetics of the original two cells which can be grown and their unique properties studied.
It sounds to me like they are doing the same thing with HIV and SARS? (Big maybe on that.) Its confusing, because the RNA (genome) of the SARS-CoV-2 does not have enough HIV RNA to justify such a mixture (its only a dozen or so nucleotide similarity I think).
Its important to remember though, the Luciferase is in the HIV virus because Luciferase is a great tool for being able to see which cells have been infected. It is not in and of itself in any way sinister.
The email itself may be the smoking gun, or it may be nothing. If it was sent FROM Fauci, it would be immediate GITMO for Fauci. Because it was sent to him from someone unknown (as far as I know) it doesn't have a direct connection to him, and isn't really proof of anything (yet). It could have been sent by someone who Fauci had no connection with, or for whom there can be no connection established other than this one email. It could have been a hoax email for all I know.
More evidence and virologist insight is needed.
Luciferase - is this like...a known chemical? Who named this thing?
Pedosatanists.
https://www.goldbio.com/articles/article/The-History-of-Luciferin-and-Luciferase-discovery-timeline
https://www.behindthename.com/name/lucifer
The molecules Luciferase and Luciferin are an oxidative enzyme and a substrate respectively. These molecules are responsible for causing bioluminescence. The enzyme and substrate bind together into what is called an enzyme-substrate complex to cause a reaction.
The vaccine literally has "lucifer" in it and they call us crazy?
The luciferase is not in the vaccine. The HIV-Luc cell line is used in testing and virus creation. This does not make it part of the virus either. It's just the cell line they used in its development.
None if any of this goes into the vaccine. They are completely separate processes.
Is there a better link? I can't read it.
Thank you for gathering this together.
Injecting Lucifer... what could go wrong?
All I am saying is if my Mom & Dad start glowing, I will need to ask them who was the bringer of that light LoL
Luciferase is not a virus, it is an enzyme which is a type of protein. What this is saying is that it is using a lentiviral plasmid. A plasmid is a ring of double stranded DNA that is often used for gene cloning. The desired genes are spliced into the plasmid which becomes a recombinant plasmid that can be replicated to produce large quantities of the desired genes.
Why are they using HIV plasmids? Can't these proteins infect us?
Are you saying they are splicing HIV genes into people?
No, I'm saying that they were splicing genes into the plasmid to go along with the HIV backbone, probably a spike protein along with the luciferase reporter.
I think that they were using the plasmids to produce altered viral DNA in order to create a modified virus. There is a diagram of the plasmid in your image, but it is too blurry to read.
Damn
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/fauci-emails-reveal-damage-control-scramble-after-zerohedge-spotlights-man-made-covid-19