Thank goodness we won WW2 and protected the wealth of the globalist New World Order Jewish banking dynasties and reestablished Rothschild owned central banks in Austria and Germany after Hitler had ended them. If we hadn't stopped Hitler in 1945, he may have freed all of Europe from being debt slaves to globalist New World Order Jewish bankers. /s
I've read the research about Hitler being a Rothschild and my major issue with that study is it focuses exclusively on the possibility without exploring how likely it is.
The study claiming Hitler to be African has exactly the same flaw: it's possible Hitler had distant African ancestors but it's more likely he didn't.
we questioned your theory months ago when we first heard it
I'd love to read that: source?
we have doubts based in the first paragraph
My entire comment is consists of only one paragraph. Can you please be specific about what your have doubts about.
If you dispute every word then please identify which claim you dispute the most so we can start there.
Also, it's fine to have doubts because that's a sign of an open mind.
I've already explained that your first paragraph is just a theory based a possibility that doesn't explore actual liklihood, using the exact same argument that people make to claim Hitler was an African.
If Hitler shared remote ancestry with the Rothschild, that doesn't disprove my theory in the same way that being a descendant of James Cook doesn't make you a sailor.
If your theory is true or not, is doesn't disprove my theory in any way.
My claim is based on two irrefutable facts:
Q has identified the House of Rothschild both as a major player in the globalist New World Order by identifying them as "++" and naming all 191 of 195 "Rothschild owned and controlled banks" in Q post #135-138. If you believe in Q then it's irrefutable to suggest the House of Rothschild bankers aren't the definition of the New World Order.
Hitler did kick the New World Order globalists bankers out of Germany and Austria.
If Hitler shared remote ancestry with the Rothschild, that doesn't disprove my theory in the same way that being a descendant of James Cook doesn't make you a sailor.
I can substantiate my theory using facts.
Please remove your censorship of my substantiated, fact based theory.
Truth never needs censorship to protect it.
EDIT: Can you please provide a link to the original argument from months ago: I'd like to see if it provides any links or additional information for my research?
Monday is the day the Declaration of independence was drafted.
Thank goodness we won WW2 and protected the wealth of the globalist New World Order Jewish banking dynasties and reestablished Rothschild owned central banks in Austria and Germany after Hitler had ended them. If we hadn't stopped Hitler in 1945, he may have freed all of Europe from being debt slaves to globalist New World Order Jewish bankers. /s
This. This is the great awakening that needs to happen.
I've read the research about Hitler being a Rothschild and my major issue with that study is it focuses exclusively on the possibility without exploring how likely it is.
The study claiming Hitler to be African has exactly the same flaw: it's possible Hitler had distant African ancestors but it's more likely he didn't.
I'd love to read that: source?
My entire comment is consists of only one paragraph. Can you please be specific about what your have doubts about.
If you dispute every word then please identify which claim you dispute the most so we can start there.
Also, it's fine to have doubts because that's a sign of an open mind.
I've already explained that your first paragraph is just a theory based a possibility that doesn't explore actual liklihood, using the exact same argument that people make to claim Hitler was an African.
If Hitler shared remote ancestry with the Rothschild, that doesn't disprove my theory in the same way that being a descendant of James Cook doesn't make you a sailor.
If your theory is true or not, is doesn't disprove my theory in any way.
My claim is based on two irrefutable facts:
Q has identified the House of Rothschild both as a major player in the globalist New World Order by identifying them as "++" and naming all 191 of 195 "Rothschild owned and controlled banks" in Q post #135-138. If you believe in Q then it's irrefutable to suggest the House of Rothschild bankers aren't the definition of the New World Order.
Hitler did kick the New World Order globalists bankers out of Germany and Austria.
If Hitler shared remote ancestry with the Rothschild, that doesn't disprove my theory in the same way that being a descendant of James Cook doesn't make you a sailor.
I can substantiate my theory using facts.
Please remove your censorship of my substantiated, fact based theory.
Truth never needs censorship to protect it.
EDIT: Can you please provide a link to the original argument from months ago: I'd like to see if it provides any links or additional information for my research?
Let us know if MSM even mentions D-Day tomorrow, or if google does a doodle for it.
Good observation! Strange that Trump would point it out a day early
https://qposts.online/?q=4435&s=postnum
https://qagg.news/?q=Day+of+Days
https://qagg.news/?q=%5BD%5Day
Which was entirely unnecessary and evil as fuck. Watch Europa; the last battle. on Rumble.
6th day of 6th month at 6am...
The biggest mistake was to leave so many socialists ALIVE after .
No. The biggest mistake was siding with the communists over the socialists. Go watch Europa, the last battle, on Rumble.
Did it ... FUCK ALL THE SOCIALISTS ... INCLUDING THE COMMUNISTS .