I edited my comment while you were responding. Apologies for a sneaky edit!
I read what you wrote thoroughly. My days of cell biology courses are behind me but I can understand research papers just fine, thank you for your derision and condescension.
You're right, he's a poser, and don't let the tap dancing obfuscate what is plainly observed IRL- clinical observations proved transmission of blood-poisoning substances to individuals in the proximity of test subjects. And all injected are test subjects, because it's not a vaccine.
I do say blood poison because the effects CROSS SYSTEMS- reproductive, vascular, respiratory, nervous, etc.
Trying to identify the transmitted agent on our end is kind of futile because big pharma has been incredibly dishonest from the get go and we really do not know what is in the injections.
Learn how to address arguments. You are obviously not a researcher, at least not in the field of cell or molecular biology, or any field related to those topics. Researchers attack arguments with logic, reason, knowledge and evidence. You attack people with vitriol and insult.
plainly observed IRL- clinical observations proved transmission of blood-poisoning substances to individuals in the proximity of test subjects
Show me the evidence of this. Please. If this is true I would really like to see it.
I do say blood poison because the effects CROSS SYSTEMS- reproductive, vascular, respiratory, nervous, etc.
If you mean the vaccines, and more specifically the S proteins, I agree; the evidence suggests that they are poisons that attack all of these systems (but especially the endothelium, at least by the CDC data).
Trying to identify the transmitted agent on our end is kind of futile because big pharma has been incredibly dishonest from the get go and we really do not know what is in the injections.
On this I agree, on all counts. It is certainly possible that something is being transmitted. I never denied that. I am making a very sound argument for why it is almost certainly not the spike protein itself. Not one refutation has been presented for a single piece of my argument.
tap dancing
Don't know enough about cell and molecular biology to address my arguments?
note: you have no evidence as this is an experiment. And by turning the burden of proof around, you hope to get away with it. The JAB is NOT the default position. YOU have to proof viability.
Has reading comprehension completely left the building?
You think I helped create the vaccine?
You think I am pro vaccine?
I have been screaming from the roof tops about how bad these vaccines are for over half a year (before they came out). Because I looked at the design and noted several flaws. I knew they would be non-targeting and get everywhere (which is their primary problem). I knew they would be able to cross the BBB. I knew they were untested, which is always bad for large scale distribution.
This is all before they even came out.
Since they have come out I have been screaming about how they are killing people. How they are causing serious adverse effects in the hundreds of thousands of people. How they are likely more harmful by the data than the virus itself. How the death data is almost certainly underreported for the vaccines (and overreported for the virus).
Blah, blah, blah. I write about this stuff almost every day. I am writing a paper on it right now.
I am about as anti-(this)vaccine as a person can be.
What I am not is afraid about things for which there is no good evidence. I have looked at the evidence. Almost certainly something is happening, but there is no good evidence whatsoever that it is the spike protein itself. I personally think this is a disinformation campaign (aka a black hat attack).
Note: I welcome (beg for) any and all evidence if you have any to present that I have not already vetted.
I am also not afraid of something for which there is another viable explanation that fits all the evidence that does exist. I'm not afraid of something for which there is no biological nor physical chemistry path in my more than a decade of experience in the field that supports the claims.
I'm not afraid of the spike protein shedding. I have tried to explain why. People seem to want to ignore my arguments for it despite the fact that they are really good arguments. I realize they can be complicated, but they can be vetted with independent research. Please look it up, or ask another expert in the field, to analyze my protests in the specifics.
I edited my comment while you were responding. Apologies for a sneaky edit!
I read what you wrote thoroughly. My days of cell biology courses are behind me but I can understand research papers just fine, thank you for your derision and condescension.
You're right, he's a poser, and don't let the tap dancing obfuscate what is plainly observed IRL- clinical observations proved transmission of blood-poisoning substances to individuals in the proximity of test subjects. And all injected are test subjects, because it's not a vaccine.
I do say blood poison because the effects CROSS SYSTEMS- reproductive, vascular, respiratory, nervous, etc.
Trying to identify the transmitted agent on our end is kind of futile because big pharma has been incredibly dishonest from the get go and we really do not know what is in the injections.
Learn how to address arguments. You are obviously not a researcher, at least not in the field of cell or molecular biology, or any field related to those topics. Researchers attack arguments with logic, reason, knowledge and evidence. You attack people with vitriol and insult.
Show me the evidence of this. Please. If this is true I would really like to see it.
If you mean the vaccines, and more specifically the S proteins, I agree; the evidence suggests that they are poisons that attack all of these systems (but especially the endothelium, at least by the CDC data).
On this I agree, on all counts. It is certainly possible that something is being transmitted. I never denied that. I am making a very sound argument for why it is almost certainly not the spike protein itself. Not one refutation has been presented for a single piece of my argument.
Don't know enough about cell and molecular biology to address my arguments?
Then why are you speaking on it at all?
start here then follow the links, there are many, but can only be read when your eyes are open. https://www.bitchute.com/video/uaB0AkbUZE3y/
SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE THE JAB YOU HELPED CREATE
is
ECOLOGICALLY SAFE
PROTECTS AGAINST SARSCOV-2
DOES NOT MAKE PEOPLE SICK
DOES NOT CAUSE DEATH.
DEFEATS SARSCOV-2
SARSCOV-2 TO BE NOT LAB CREATED.
note: you have no evidence as this is an experiment. And by turning the burden of proof around, you hope to get away with it. The JAB is NOT the default position. YOU have to proof viability.
Good luck with that.
What the holy fuck?
Has reading comprehension completely left the building?
You think I helped create the vaccine?
You think I am pro vaccine?
I have been screaming from the roof tops about how bad these vaccines are for over half a year (before they came out). Because I looked at the design and noted several flaws. I knew they would be non-targeting and get everywhere (which is their primary problem). I knew they would be able to cross the BBB. I knew they were untested, which is always bad for large scale distribution.
This is all before they even came out.
Since they have come out I have been screaming about how they are killing people. How they are causing serious adverse effects in the hundreds of thousands of people. How they are likely more harmful by the data than the virus itself. How the death data is almost certainly underreported for the vaccines (and overreported for the virus).
Blah, blah, blah. I write about this stuff almost every day. I am writing a paper on it right now.
I am about as anti-(this)vaccine as a person can be.
What I am not is afraid about things for which there is no good evidence. I have looked at the evidence. Almost certainly something is happening, but there is no good evidence whatsoever that it is the spike protein itself. I personally think this is a disinformation campaign (aka a black hat attack).
Note: I welcome (beg for) any and all evidence if you have any to present that I have not already vetted.
I am also not afraid of something for which there is another viable explanation that fits all the evidence that does exist. I'm not afraid of something for which there is no biological nor physical chemistry path in my more than a decade of experience in the field that supports the claims.
I'm not afraid of the spike protein shedding. I have tried to explain why. People seem to want to ignore my arguments for it despite the fact that they are really good arguments. I realize they can be complicated, but they can be vetted with independent research. Please look it up, or ask another expert in the field, to analyze my protests in the specifics.