I heard quite a bit of the first show of Rush's replacements. Sorry, but I can't remember their names. I liked what I heard, for the most part, but what did strike me, was when discussing election fraud, one of them said something of the order of "Well, even if it is determined that Biden only won through fraud, even the Supreme Court won't touch it, so we have to look forward to 2024". Have these guys been put in Rush's spot as "controlled opposition"? The idea that you could have an entire nation know a sitting President is only there through fraud, but do NOTHING about it until "the next election", is about the most infuriating thing that could happen, and unless the military DOES take control, there would not be a pretty outcome for the country.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
First, no one could replace Rush inn terms of his grasp of Real Politics and stinging humor. He was and remains the best blueprint for Conservatism. As much as I miss him, I think we just need to accept the loss of that great man and move on in this battle. As in any human struggle, we will have losses along the way, but we have to stay true to our calling.
Agreed!
Joseph Farah has some comments on Rush, Bo Snerdely and the election issues: https://www.wnd.com/2021/06/trump-bo-snerdley-rush-steal/
There will NEVER be a replacement for El Rushbo.
Since Rush died, I have not turned on my radio. I used to listen to him on the radio while I worked in the yard. RIP
I listened to him every day in my studio, but like you I cannot make myself listen anymore. Miss him every day still.
Yes, there is only one Rush and he is not replaceable (like Paul Harvey).
Your last sentence should read "would be glorious outcome for the country and the entire world."
I don't think anyone here thinks that another U.S. civil war would be glorious, unless they have some sick desire to kill fellow Americans.
Civil War? What are you talking about? Military exposes corruption and evil that will make even the most brainwashed lefty want blood. They carry out justice for all...happily ever after...
Anyone compared to RL will be a bad comparison, but I think Dan Bongino looks promising. I don't know enough about him to know if he's based or an idiot or controlled opposition or something else, but I like his attitude, he seems like he really loves America
I listen to Dan Bongino. He was a New York cop and secret service. He still has some connections and will give inside info every once in awhile. He doesn't talk too much about election fraud and when he does, he always is hestitant about it. He is a Trump supporter and has written 3 books on the Russia Hoax. He is passionate about truth, against CRT, censorship. I don't think he is controlled opposition. I don't know if he follows q. Every once in a while he will say things and I think he does. Like one time he said something about no one is coming to save you like 3 times and then the 4th time he said it, he added the word yet,
His 1st interview on his radio show was Trump. So, I think that says something.
He also had made it clear no one has replaced RL. There were just several people that took over his timeslot for the various media companies.
Buck Sexton is a bit of a doomer. Clay Travis came from sports media but has a JD from Vanderbilt so he generally knows what hes talking about. Id chalk it up to them trying to be realistic because its still a hypothetical amd their show JUST started so they need to maintain some level of credibility. If / when it gets to the point where the scale of fraud is revealed then thats when Ill start taking what the talking heads say more seriously
They are saying Dan Bongino. The style is too different....Bongino 'medicates' himself too much in his talk...stop and distract for his personal analogies.
Rush kept the news rolling with each word. Dan takes too long....too hard to listen to him. Similar style as Lionel....just takes too long!
As much as I loved Rush’s program, he was controlled opposition. Before the OKC bombing, pundits were asking if Bill Clinton was a lame duck. Even Clinton had to go on TV and argue that he was still relevant. After the bombing, the narrative changed to attack “hate radio.” Chuck Harder’s show was deplatformed because his location in Florida only gave him one uplink. The FCC “reallocated” that satellite. Others, like G. Gordon Liddy, Ken Hamlin, faded away. Hannity hangs in their for now. Just let him start talking about George Soros and the Khazars and he’ll have to go set up his own network like Glenn Beck had to do.
Rush saw that his popularity made him a target. For the next couple of years, instead of talking about the Clinton corruption, his show became all about the Big Tobacco lawsuits. (How ironic that tobacco use killed the man!)
Rush would not touch a “conspiracy theory” with a ten foot pole. When callers would call in and bring up those theories, he always discounted them. Only in the last months of his life did he begin to address them, when he knew his time was almost up. Rush did what he could, but he always knew which side his bread was buttered on.
I think you bringing up that he only began to address "conspiracy theories" suggests that he was not controlled opposition, but cautious in opposition. He may have known that he was on a fine line between having to placate the DS enough to be allowed to continue his show, or several alternatives. Does the LDS in your screen name mean you actually believe the Mormon con? Because, if you are interested in searching for truth, as most people here are, you would conclude, with only minimal looking, that the Mormon "church" has no justification through scripture, and even rational throught (Jesus didn't die on a cross 2,000 years ago only to have some guy claim he was given golden shields almost 2,000 years later, that essentially claims that everything about Christianity up to that point was wrong; God doesn't work that way).
Go read the story of Joseph in the Bible, the one whose brothers hated and sold him into slavery in Egypt. Why did they hate their brother? It was because of a vision he had in an inspired dream. In the end of the story, you will see that his brothers ended up doing the unthinkable. They had to humble themselves and go to Egypt to beg for food. Joseph’s identity was hidden from them. He wore a veil and spoke Egyptian. They didn’t recognize him. Yet he saved his family from starving. When they learned who he was, Joseph’s brothers repented. This story is also a prophecy about what is about to occur. Christians will one day know their Latter-day Saint brothers and repent of the evil they said about us. It may take us saving them from famine, but one day, it will happen.
https://ldsanon.wixsite.com/ldsanon/post/be-prepared-q-will-probably-fail
Chuck Harder. Wow! Haven’t heard that name in years.
Harder’s show was talking about the CFR, Clinton traveling to Epstein Island, CIA drug-running through Mena Airport, and other Cabal activity back in the mid-1990s. He also reported on the Branch Dravidian massacre a lot. After the OKC bombing, they wanted to take him out. His broadcast came from a historic hotel building he owned down in Florida. From that location, his show uplink could only hit one satellite. Clinton’s FCC re-allocated the satellite and he lost access to it. The Internet was just coming in at the time. Most people were still on dial-up so streaming audio wasn’t possible.
G. Gordon Liddy used to hammer the corrupt FBI’s hostage rescue team and the ATF for Ruby Ridge. Ken Harbin,”The Black Avenger” was a staunch black conservative.
Many of us have been awake and trying to red-pill people for decades. I first learned about the Cabal when I read Gary Allen’s “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” in the early 1980s. Later on, I wrote a book about it myself, which has been out-of-print for almost two decades.
If I seem impatient with Q and the plan and all the folks who have just recently awakened to the danger, it’s because I have been at this for a very long time.