Why, because it has a picture of Seth and a person typing that’s my brother. I should’ve done that.
Find a picture with Seth and his family, anyone in his family. All I’ve seen is a video of the “family” saying how awesome he was, while his “brother” tries not to laugh about it. Everyone in the comments recognize the same thing.
If we start believing everything written on the internet. Well I guess Trump lost and we just had the most honest election in our history.
I think that if they were going to hide Seth rich, they would try a little harder than that. Anything is possible, however. The best hiding place is in plain sight, or so the cliche goes.
Reasons for redaction are intriguing, heres what i could find on foia codes. There is a lot of 7c3s and b3-2s in there.
Exemption (b)(3) Information protected by statute
(b)(3)-1 Federal grand jury information, prohibited from disclosure by Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
(b)(3)-2 Intelligence sources and methods,
prohibited from disclosure by the
National Security Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C. § 3024(i)(1)
Exemption (b)(5) Information withheld pursuant to the deliberative process privilege
(b)(5)-1 Deliberations about application of law to specific factual scenarios
(b)(5)-2 Deliberations about charging decisions not to prosecute
Exemption (b)(7)(A) Pending law enforcement proceedings
Exemption (b)(7)(B) Information which would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or
impartial adjudication
Exemptions (b)(6) and (b)(7)(C) Unwarranted invasions of personal privacy
(b)(6)/(b)(7)(C)-1 Names, social media account information, and other contact
information of unwitting third parties
(b)(6)/(b)(7)(C)-2 Names and personally-identifiable information about individuals not
charged by the SCO (special council office)
(b)(6)/(b)(7)(C)-3 Information concerning a subject of the investigation by the SCO
(b)(6)/(b)(7)(C)-4 Names, social media account information, contact information, and
other personally-identifiable information of individuals merely mentioned in the Report
Exemption (b)(7)(E) Investigative techniques and procedures.
(b)(7)(E)-1 Information that would reveal techniques authorized for and used in
national security investigations
(b)(7)(E)-2 Details about techniques and procedures that would reveal investigative focus and scope, and circumstances, methods and fruits of investigative operations
1 Redactions made pursuant to FOIA Exemptions (7)(A) and (7)(B) have not been divided into coded
Follow the wives.
Did Seth rich have a twin brother??
I can’t find out anywhere. But check these photos.
https://ibb.co/Khv54p2
Holy shit
I may post that to see if anyone knows for sure.
It’s his brother. https://www.gofundme.com/f/SethRich
Why, because it has a picture of Seth and a person typing that’s my brother. I should’ve done that.
Find a picture with Seth and his family, anyone in his family. All I’ve seen is a video of the “family” saying how awesome he was, while his “brother” tries not to laugh about it. Everyone in the comments recognize the same thing.
If we start believing everything written on the internet. Well I guess Trump lost and we just had the most honest election in our history.
I think that if they were going to hide Seth rich, they would try a little harder than that. Anything is possible, however. The best hiding place is in plain sight, or so the cliche goes.
Aaron is Seth's brother. They are both sons of Joel and Mary Rich.
Son of a bitch
Strzok is an idiot... its "quashed"... Not "squashed"
"quashed" - story "squashed" - dead
IMHO either quashed (formally correct) or squashed (informal) would be applicable here
But you're still right, Sztrok is an idiot :)
/wordnerd
Maybe he was thinking about some good ole cheesy summer squash casserole?
Legit. Thanks for posting this.
Whole pages are missing due to b7a redaction classification, which relates to pending law enforcement proceedings, aka active investigations or cases.
Reasons for redaction are intriguing, heres what i could find on foia codes. There is a lot of 7c3s and b3-2s in there.
Exemption (b)(3) Information protected by statute
(b)(3)-1 Federal grand jury information, prohibited from disclosure by Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
(b)(3)-2 Intelligence sources and methods, prohibited from disclosure by the National Security Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C. § 3024(i)(1)
Exemption (b)(5) Information withheld pursuant to the deliberative process privilege
(b)(5)-1 Deliberations about application of law to specific factual scenarios
(b)(5)-2 Deliberations about charging decisions not to prosecute
Exemption (b)(7)(A) Pending law enforcement proceedings
Exemption (b)(7)(B) Information which would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or impartial adjudication
Exemptions (b)(6) and (b)(7)(C) Unwarranted invasions of personal privacy
(b)(6)/(b)(7)(C)-1 Names, social media account information, and other contact information of unwitting third parties
(b)(6)/(b)(7)(C)-2 Names and personally-identifiable information about individuals not charged by the SCO (special council office)
(b)(6)/(b)(7)(C)-3 Information concerning a subject of the investigation by the SCO
(b)(6)/(b)(7)(C)-4 Names, social media account information, contact information, and other personally-identifiable information of individuals merely mentioned in the Report
Exemption (b)(7)(E) Investigative techniques and procedures.
(b)(7)(E)-1 Information that would reveal techniques authorized for and used in national security investigations
(b)(7)(E)-2 Details about techniques and procedures that would reveal investigative focus and scope, and circumstances, methods and fruits of investigative operations
1 Redactions made pursuant to FOIA Exemptions (7)(A) and (7)(B) have not been divided into coded
Malcolm Nance.