Wrong. But way to get a jump on the maricopa/msm narrative. The difference between the truth and the bullshit you just spewed is simple... it’s facts rooted in evidence. None of which maricopa or msm have presented.
So you address one item amongst about a dozen. all the security faults, lost records, breached chains of custody by the county, voter roll post hoc updates, etc... what's the explanation you will give regarding all of these?
At a glance, you misread the article: There are 74,243 mail-in ballots with no clear record of being sent out. Do they call "early ballots" mail in ones in AZ, and if so, why? Surely if they aren't mail related it should be considered a mail in ballot. You ask GA Peach Patriot for proof they are right on the issue. Where is your proof of your own assertion? Any claim without evidence (and there is plenty for the audit, and video evidence too) can be dismissed without evidence.
I doubt you will provide this before you get hit as a shill, my lil handshake, but i look forward to see you flounder.
I am from Az and mail in ballots are different from early voting ballots or voting on election day. Mail in ballots have to have a record of being mailed out so people don't double vote by mail in and in person. I did mail in voting for years. One year, I damaged my nail in ballot. I was allowed to vote using a provisional ballot. As long as there was no record of my mail in ballot being received after counting, then my provisional ballot was counted. Having no record of being mailed out is huge.
mail in ballots are different from early voting ballots or voting on election day
Any rational person understands this. That's the reason I point out the absurdity of early in-person ballots being indistinguishable from mail-in ballots. The user above is reciting the Maricopa BOS explanation verbatim. But when asked to expound upon the reasoning, no one seems able to do so. That's because it's bullshit; and everyone knows it.
If they were mail-in ballots, they go to voters on the permanent mail-in list, they arrive folded in an envelope with a return envelope, and you could in this election return them in person early. I did that and put it in a ballot box. Other people at the in-person site were filling out ballots. It was all very sus and not the way it has been done before.
Which were different? I've only had the mail-in ones for years. afaik they look the same, except there are something like 692 legitimate variations just in Maricopa, because of different local races, e.g. city taxes, city councils. I took mine in the sealed envelope, the attendant checked that I had signed it, that's all. In the past, before machines, the attendants had extra ballots and would check you out against the voter record book, then make a note of it as the latest ballot if you wanted to replace the mailed one.
ARCHIVED
https://archive.is/Uv9Nx
Wrong. But way to get a jump on the maricopa/msm narrative. The difference between the truth and the bullshit you just spewed is simple... it’s facts rooted in evidence. None of which maricopa or msm have presented.
So you address one item amongst about a dozen. all the security faults, lost records, breached chains of custody by the county, voter roll post hoc updates, etc... what's the explanation you will give regarding all of these?
At a glance, you misread the article: There are 74,243 mail-in ballots with no clear record of being sent out. Do they call "early ballots" mail in ones in AZ, and if so, why? Surely if they aren't mail related it should be considered a mail in ballot. You ask GA Peach Patriot for proof they are right on the issue. Where is your proof of your own assertion? Any claim without evidence (and there is plenty for the audit, and video evidence too) can be dismissed without evidence.
I doubt you will provide this before you get hit as a shill, my lil handshake, but i look forward to see you flounder.
So early in-person ballots are indistinguishable from mail-in ballots? Why? How do you track ballots in such a system?
I am from Az and mail in ballots are different from early voting ballots or voting on election day. Mail in ballots have to have a record of being mailed out so people don't double vote by mail in and in person. I did mail in voting for years. One year, I damaged my nail in ballot. I was allowed to vote using a provisional ballot. As long as there was no record of my mail in ballot being received after counting, then my provisional ballot was counted. Having no record of being mailed out is huge.
Any rational person understands this. That's the reason I point out the absurdity of early in-person ballots being indistinguishable from mail-in ballots. The user above is reciting the Maricopa BOS explanation verbatim. But when asked to expound upon the reasoning, no one seems able to do so. That's because it's bullshit; and everyone knows it.
If they were mail-in ballots, they go to voters on the permanent mail-in list, they arrive folded in an envelope with a return envelope, and you could in this election return them in person early. I did that and put it in a ballot box. Other people at the in-person site were filling out ballots. It was all very sus and not the way it has been done before.
But the ballots were different, yes?
Which were different? I've only had the mail-in ones for years. afaik they look the same, except there are something like 692 legitimate variations just in Maricopa, because of different local races, e.g. city taxes, city councils. I took mine in the sealed envelope, the attendant checked that I had signed it, that's all. In the past, before machines, the attendants had extra ballots and would check you out against the voter record book, then make a note of it as the latest ballot if you wanted to replace the mailed one.